Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-279-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-279-2022
Research article
 | 
20 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 20 Jan 2022

Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network

Heike Kalesse-Los, Willi Schimmel, Edward Luke, and Patric Seifert

Related authors

Investigating KDP signatures inside and below the dendritic growth layer with W-band Doppler Radar and in situ snowfall camera
Anton Kötsche, Alexander Myagkov, Leonie von Terzi, Maximilian Maahn, Veronika Ettrichrätz, Teresa Vogl, Alexander Ryzhkov, Petar Bukovcic, Davide Ori, and Heike Kalesse-Los
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-734,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-734, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Discriminating between “drizzle or rain” and sea salt aerosols in Cloudnet for measurements over the Barbados Cloud Observatory
Johanna Roschke, Jonas Witthuhn, Marcus Klingebiel, Moritz Haarig, Andreas Foth, Anton Kötsche, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 487–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-487-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-487-2025, 2025
Short summary
Determination of low-level temperature profiles from microwave radiometer observations during rain
Andreas Foth, Moritz Lochmann, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7169–7181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7169-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7169-2024, 2024
Short summary
PEAKO and peakTree: tools for detecting and interpreting peaks in cloud radar Doppler spectra – capabilities and limitations
Teresa Vogl, Martin Radenz, Fabiola Ramelli, Rosa Gierens, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6547–6568, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6547-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6547-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ground- and ship-based microwave radiometer measurements during EUREC4A
Sabrina Schnitt, Andreas Foth, Heike Kalesse-Los, Mario Mech, Claudia Acquistapace, Friedhelm Jansen, Ulrich Löhnert, Bernhard Pospichal, Johannes Röttenbacher, Susanne Crewell, and Bjorn Stevens
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 681–700, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-681-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-681-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Wet-radome attenuation in ARM cloud radars and its utilization in radar calibration using disdrometer measurements
Min Deng, Scott E. Giangrande, Michael P. Jensen, Karen Johnson, Christopher R. Williams, Jennifer M. Comstock, Ya-Chien Feng, Alyssa Matthews, Iosif A. Lindenmaier, Timothy G. Wendler, Marquette Rocque, Aifang Zhou, Zeen Zhu, Edward Luke, and Die Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1641–1657, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1641-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1641-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tomographic reconstruction algorithms for retrieving two-dimensional ice cloud microphysical parameters using along-track (sub)millimeter-wave radiometer observations
Yuli Liu and Ian Stuart Adams
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1659–1674, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1659-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1659-2025, 2025
Short summary
Empirical model for backscattering polarimetric variables in rain at W-band: motivation and implications
Alexander Myagkov, Tatiana Nomokonova, and Michael Frech
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1621–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1621-2025, 2025
Short summary
JAXA Level 2 cloud and precipitation microphysics retrievals based on EarthCARE radar, lidar, and imager: the CPR_CLP, AC_CLP, and ACM_CLP products
Kaori Sato, Hajime Okamoto, Tomoaki Nishizawa, Yoshitaka Jin, Takashi Y. Nakajima, Minrui Wang, Masaki Satoh, Woosub Roh, Hiroshi Ishimoto, and Rei Kudo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1325–1338, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1325-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1325-2025, 2025
Short summary
Peering into the heart of thunderstorm clouds: insights from cloud radar and spectral polarimetry
Ho Yi Lydia Mak and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1209–1242, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1209-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1209-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersen, H., Cermak, J., Fuchs, J., Knutti, R., and Lohmann, U.: Understanding the drivers of marine liquid-water cloud occurrence and properties with global observations using neural networks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9535–9546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9535-2017, 2017. a, b
Bühl, J., Seifert, P., Wandinger, U., Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Schmidt, J., Myagkov, A., Engelmann, R., Skupin, A., Heese, B., Klepel, A., Althausen, D., and Ansmann, A.: LACROS: the Leipzig Aerosol and Cloud Remote Observations System, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 8890, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2030911, 2013. a
CLU: Cloud profiling products: Classification, Drizzle, Ice water content, Liquid water content, Categorize; ecmwf, gdas1 model data; 2014-10-01 to 2014-11-18; from Cabauw, Generated by the cloud profiling unit of the ACTRIS Data Centre [data set], available at: https://hdl.handle.net/21.12132/2.768aa9ddaed14632, last access: 18 January 2022. a
Cotton, W. R. and Anthes, R. A.: The mesoscale structure of extratopical cyclones and middle and high clouds. Storm and Cloud Dynamics, Int. Geophys. Ser., 44, 745–787, 1989. a
de Boer, G., Eloranta, E. W., and Shupe, M. D.: Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Cloud Properties from Multiple Years of Surface-Based Measurements at Two High-Latitude Locations, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2874–2887, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3029.1, 2009. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
It is important to detect the vertical distribution of cloud droplets and ice in mixed-phase clouds. Here, an artificial neural network (ANN) previously developed for Arctic clouds is applied to a mid-latitudinal cloud radar data set. The performance of this technique is contrasted to the Cloudnet target classification. For thick/multi-layer clouds, the machine learning technique is better at detecting liquid than Cloudnet, but if lidar data are available Cloudnet is at least as good as the ANN.
Share