Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3189–3192, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3189–3192, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
Peer-reviewed comment
25 May 2022
Peer-reviewed comment | 25 May 2022

Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021)

Noah Bernays et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,058 189 26 1,273 13 16
  • HTML: 1,058
  • PDF: 189
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 1,273
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,181 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,181 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Oct 2022
Short summary
Ozone is an important pollutant that impacts millions of people worldwide. It is therefore important to ensure accurate measurements. A recent surge in wildfire activity in the USA has resulted in significant enhancements in ozone concentration. However given the nature of wildfire smoke, there are questions about our ability to accurately measure ozone. In this comment, we discuss possible biases in the UV measurements of ozone in the presence of smoke.