Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
25 May 2022
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 25 May 2022

Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021)

Noah Bernays, Daniel A. Jaffe, Irina Petropavlovskikh, and Peter Effertz

Viewed

Total article views: 2,002 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,545 400 57 2,002 44 49
  • HTML: 1,545
  • PDF: 400
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 2,002
  • BibTeX: 44
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,002 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,932 with geography defined and 70 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Ozone is an important pollutant that impacts millions of people worldwide. It is therefore important to ensure accurate measurements. A recent surge in wildfire activity in the USA has resulted in significant enhancements in ozone concentration. However given the nature of wildfire smoke, there are questions about our ability to accurately measure ozone. In this comment, we discuss possible biases in the UV measurements of ozone in the presence of smoke.
Read more