Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
25 May 2022
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 25 May 2022

Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021)

Noah Bernays, Daniel A. Jaffe, Irina Petropavlovskikh, and Peter Effertz

Related authors

Intensive aerosol properties of boreal and regional biomass burning aerosol at Mt. Bachelor Observatory: larger and black carbon (BC)-dominant particles transported from Siberian wildfires
Nathaniel W. May, Noah Bernays, Ryan Farley, Qi Zhang, and Daniel A. Jaffe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2747–2764, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2747-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2747-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Calibrating adsorptive and reactive losses of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes in dynamic chambers using deuterated surrogates
Jianqiang Zeng, Yanli Zhang, Haofan Ran, Weihua Pang, Hao Guo, Zhaobin Mu, Wei Song, and Xinming Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1811–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1811-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1811-2025, 2025
Short summary
Orphaned Oil & Gas Well Methane Emission Rates Quantified with Gaussian Plume Inversions of Ambient Observations
Emily Follansbee, James E. Lee, Mohit L. Dubey, Jonathan F. Dooley, Curtis Shuck, Ken Minschwaner, Andre Santos, Sebastien C. Biraud, and Manvendra K. Dubey
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-344,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-344, 2025
Short summary
OF–CEAS laser spectroscopy to measure water isotopes in dry environments: example of application in Antarctica
Thomas Lauwers, Elise Fourré, Olivier Jossoud, Daniele Romanini, Frédéric Prié, Giordano Nitti, Mathieu Casado, Kévin Jaulin, Markus Miltner, Morgane Farradèche, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, and Amaëlle Landais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1135–1147, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1135-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1135-2025, 2025
Short summary
Performance evaluation of air quality sensors for environmental epidemiology
Miriam Chacón-Mateos, Héctor García-Salamero, Bernd Laquai, and Ulrich Vogt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-587,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-587, 2025
Short summary
Interpretation of mass spectra by a Vocus proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) at an urban site: insights from gas-chromatographic pre-separation
Ying Zhang, Yuwei Wang, Chuang Li, Yueyang Li, Sijia Yin, Megan S. Claflin, Brian M. Lerner, Douglas Worsnop, and Lin Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-757,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-757, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Brey, S. J. and Fischer, E. V.: Smoke in the city: how often and where does smoke impact summertime ozone in the United States?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 1288–1294, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05218, 2016. 
Crutzen, P. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Biomass burning in the tropics: Impact on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles, Science, 250, 1669–1678, 1990. 
Crutzen, P. J., Heidt, L. E., Krasnec, J. P., Pollock, W. H., and Seiler, W.: Biomass burning as a source of atmospheric gases CO, H2, N2O, NO, CH3Cl, and COS, Nature, 282, 253–256, 1979. 
Gao, H. and Jaffe, D. A.: Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance and NO-chemiluminescence for ozone measurement in wildfire plumes at the Mount Bachelor Observatory, Atmos. Environ., 166, 224–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.007, 2017. 
Gong, X., Kaulfus, A., Nair, U., and Jaffe, D. A: Quantifying O3 impacts in urban areas due to wildfires using a generalized additive model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 13216–13223, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03130, 2017. 
Short summary
Ozone is an important pollutant that impacts millions of people worldwide. It is therefore important to ensure accurate measurements. A recent surge in wildfire activity in the USA has resulted in significant enhancements in ozone concentration. However given the nature of wildfire smoke, there are questions about our ability to accurately measure ozone. In this comment, we discuss possible biases in the UV measurements of ozone in the presence of smoke.
Share