Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3223-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3223-2022
Research article
 | 
30 May 2022
Research article |  | 30 May 2022

Aircraft-engine particulate matter emissions from conventional and sustainable aviation fuel combustion: comparison of measurement techniques for mass, number, and size

Joel C. Corbin, Tobias Schripp, Bruce E. Anderson, Greg J. Smallwood, Patrick LeClercq, Ewan C. Crosbie, Steven Achterberg, Philip D. Whitefield, Richard C. Miake-Lye, Zhenhong Yu, Andrew Freedman, Max Trueblood, David Satterfield, Wenyan Liu, Patrick Oßwald, Claire Robinson, Michael A. Shook, Richard H. Moore, and Prem Lobo

Viewed

Total article views: 2,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,905 1,030 58 2,993 38 49
  • HTML: 1,905
  • PDF: 1,030
  • XML: 58
  • Total: 2,993
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,951 with geography defined and 42 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
The combustion of sustainable aviation fuels in aircraft engines produces particulate matter (PM) emissions with different properties than conventional fuels due to changes in fuel composition. Consequently, the response of various diagnostic instruments to PM emissions may be impacted. We found no significant instrument biases in terms of particle mass, number, and size measurements for conventional and sustainable aviation fuel blends despite large differences in the magnitude of emissions.