Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022
Research article
 | 
21 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 21 Jul 2022

Locations for the best lidar view of mid-level and high clouds

Matthias Tesche and Vincent Noel

Related authors

A cloud-by-cloud approach for studying aerosol–cloud interaction in satellite observations
Fani Alexandri, Felix Müller, Goutam Choudhury, Peggy Achtert, Torsten Seelig, and Matthias Tesche
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1739–1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-section reference value for the analysis of horizontally scanning aerosol lidar observations
Juseon Shin, Gahyeong Kim, Dukhyeon Kim, Matthias Tesche, Gahyeon Park, and Youngmin Noh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 397–406, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
A first global height-resolved cloud condensation nuclei data set derived from spaceborne lidar measurements
Goutam Choudhury and Matthias Tesche
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3747–3760, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3747-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3747-2023, 2023
Short summary
TrackMatcher – a tool for finding intercepts in tracks of geographical positions
Peter Bräuer and Matthias Tesche
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7557–7572, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7557-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7557-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of aerosol number concentrations from CALIPSO with ATom airborne in situ measurements
Goutam Choudhury, Albert Ansmann, and Matthias Tesche
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7143–7161, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7143-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7143-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Polarization upgrade of specMACS: calibration and characterization of the 2D RGB polarization-resolving cameras
Anna Weber, Tobias Kölling, Veronika Pörtge, Andreas Baumgartner, Clemens Rammeloo, Tobias Zinner, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1419–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1419-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1419-2024, 2024
Short summary
Detection of small drizzle droplets in a large cloud chamber using ultrahigh-resolution radar
Zeen Zhu, Fan Yang, Pavlos Kollias, Raymond A. Shaw, Alex B. Kostinski, Steve Krueger, Katia Lamer, Nithin Allwayin, and Mariko Oue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1133–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1133-2024, 2024
Short summary
W-band SZ relationships for rimed snow particles: observational evidence from combined airborne and ground-based observations
Shelby Fuller, Samuel A. Marlow, Samuel Haimov, Matthew Burkhart, Kevin Shaffer, Austin Morgan, and Jefferson R. Snider
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6123–6142, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6123-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6123-2023, 2023
Short summary
The generation of EarthCARE L1 test data sets using atmospheric model data sets
David P. Donovan, Pavlos Kollias, Almudena Velázquez Blázquez, and Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5327–5356, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5327-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5327-2023, 2023
Short summary
The EarthCARE mission – science and system overview
Tobias Wehr, Takuji Kubota, Georgios Tzeremes, Kotska Wallace, Hirotaka Nakatsuka, Yuichi Ohno, Rob Koopman, Stephanie Rusli, Maki Kikuchi, Michael Eisinger, Toshiyuki Tanaka, Masatoshi Taga, Patrick Deghaye, Eichi Tomita, and Dirk Bernaerts
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3581–3608, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3581-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3581-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adebiyi, A. A., Zuidema, P., Chang, I., Burton, S. P., and Cairns, B.: Mid-level clouds are frequent above the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11025–11043, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11025-2020, 2020. a
Alexander, S. P. and Klekociuk, A. R.: Constraining ice water content of thin Antarctic cirrus clouds using ground-based lidar and satellite data, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 1791–1806, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0251.1, 2021. a
Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Riebesell, M., Weitkamp, C., and Michaelis, W.: Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar, Appl. Opt., 31, 7113–7131, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.007113, 1992. a
Ansmann, A., Mattis, I., Müller, D., Wandinger, U., Radlach, M., Althausen, D., and Damoah, R.: Ice formation in Saharan dust over central Europe observed with temperature/humidity/aerosol Raman lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18S12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005000, 2005. a, b
Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Althausen, D., Müller, D., Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Wiegner, M., Pisani, G., Knippertz, P., and Dubovik, O.: Influence of Saharan dust on cloud glaciation in southern Morocco during SAMUM, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D04210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008785, 2008. a
Short summary
Mid-level and high clouds can be considered natural laboratories for studying cloud glaciation in the atmosphere. While they can be conveniently observed from ground with lidar, such measurements require a clear line of sight between the instrument and the target cloud. Here, observations of clouds with two spaceborne lidars are used to assess where ground-based lidar measurements of mid- and upper-level clouds are least affected by the light-attenuating effect of low-level clouds.