Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2022

Sensitivity analysis of DSD retrievals from polarimetric radar in stratiform rain based on the μ–Λ relationship

Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal

Related authors

A new power-law model for μ–Λ relationships in convective and stratiform rainfall
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 235–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
An information content approach to diagnosing and improving CLIMCAPS retrieval consistency across instruments and satellites
Nadia Smith and Christopher D. Barnet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1823–1839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1823-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1823-2025, 2025
Short summary
Characterizing urban planetary boundary layer dynamics using 3-year Doppler wind lidar measurements in a western Yangtze River Delta city, China
Tianwen Wei, Mengya Wang, Kenan Wu, Jinlong Yuan, Haiyun Xia, and Simone Lolli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1841–1857, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1841-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1841-2025, 2025
Short summary
Radar-based high-resolution ensemble precipitation analyses over the French Alps
Matthieu Vernay, Matthieu Lafaysse, and Clotilde Augros
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1731–1755, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1731-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1731-2025, 2025
Short summary
Gravity waves above the northern Atlantic and Europe during streamer events using Aeolus
Sabine Wüst, Lisa Küchelbacher, Franziska Trinkl, and Michael Bittner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1591–1607, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1591-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1591-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observations of tall-building wakes using a scanning Doppler lidar
Natalie E. Theeuwes, Janet F. Barlow, Antti Mannisenaho, Denise Hertwig, Ewan O'Connor, and Alan Robins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1355–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1355-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1355-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adirosi, E., Volpi, E., Lombardo, F., and Baldini, L.: Raindrop size distribution: Fitting performance of common theoretical models, Adv. Water Res., 96, 290–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.010, 2016. a
Battaglia, A., Rustemeier, E., Tokay, A., Blahak, U., and Simmer, C.: PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 27, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1, 2010. a
Berne, A. and Schleiss, M.: Retrieval of the rain drop size distribution using telecommunication dual-polarization microwave links, 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Williamsburg, VA, USA, October 2009, American Meteorological Society, https://ams.confex.com/ams/34Radar/techprogram/paper_155668.htm (last access: 9 October 2009), 2009. a
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541094, 2001. a, b
Bringi, V. N., Huang, G.-J., Chandrasekar, V., and Gorgucci, E.: A Methodology for Estimating the Parameters of a Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Model from Polarimetric Radar Data: Application to a Squall-Line Event from the TRMM/Brazil Campaign, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 19, 633–645, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0633:AMFETP>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.
Share