Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2022

Sensitivity analysis of DSD retrievals from polarimetric radar in stratiform rain based on the μ–Λ relationship

Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal

Related authors

A new power-law model for μ–Λ relationships in convective and stratiform rainfall
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 235–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Determination of low-level temperature profiles from microwave radiometer observations during rain
Andreas Foth, Moritz Lochmann, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7169–7181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7169-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7169-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aeolus lidar surface return (LSR) at 355 nm as a new Aeolus Level-2A product
Lev D. Labzovskii, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, David P. Donovan, Jos de Kloe, L. Gijsbert Tilstra, Ad Stoffelen, Damien Josset, and Piet Stammes
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7183–7208, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7183-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7183-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sampling the diurnal and annual cycles of the Earth's energy imbalance with constellations of satellite-borne radiometers
Thomas Hocking, Thorsten Mauritsen, and Linda Megner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7077–7095, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of top-of-atmosphere fluxes from combined EarthCARE lidar, imager, and broadband radiometer observations: the BMA-FLX product
Almudena Velázquez Blázquez, Carlos Domenech, Edward Baudrez, Nicolas Clerbaux, Carla Salas Molar, and Nils Madenach
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7007–7026, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7007-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7007-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of the measurement uncertainty for a 3D wind lidar
Wolf Knöller, Gholamhossein Bagheri, Philipp von Olshausen, and Michael Wilczek
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6913–6931, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6913-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6913-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adirosi, E., Volpi, E., Lombardo, F., and Baldini, L.: Raindrop size distribution: Fitting performance of common theoretical models, Adv. Water Res., 96, 290–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.010, 2016. a
Battaglia, A., Rustemeier, E., Tokay, A., Blahak, U., and Simmer, C.: PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 27, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1, 2010. a
Berne, A. and Schleiss, M.: Retrieval of the rain drop size distribution using telecommunication dual-polarization microwave links, 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Williamsburg, VA, USA, October 2009, American Meteorological Society, https://ams.confex.com/ams/34Radar/techprogram/paper_155668.htm (last access: 9 October 2009), 2009. a
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541094, 2001. a, b
Bringi, V. N., Huang, G.-J., Chandrasekar, V., and Gorgucci, E.: A Methodology for Estimating the Parameters of a Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Model from Polarimetric Radar Data: Application to a Squall-Line Event from the TRMM/Brazil Campaign, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 19, 633–645, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0633:AMFETP>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.