Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2022

Sensitivity analysis of DSD retrievals from polarimetric radar in stratiform rain based on the μ–Λ relationship

Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal

Related authors

A new power-law model for μ–Λ relationships in convective and stratiform rainfall
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 235–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Unfiltering of the EarthCARE Broadband Radiometer (BBR) observations: the BM-RAD product
Almudena Velázquez Blázquez, Edward Baudrez, Nicolas Clerbaux, and Carlos Domenech
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4245–4256, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4245-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Variance estimations in the presence of intermittent interference and their applications to incoherent scatter radar signal processing
Qihou Zhou, Yanlin Li, and Yun Gong
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4197–4209, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4197-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4197-2024, 2024
Short summary
A clustering-based method for identifying and tracking squall lines
Zhao Shi, Yuxiang Wen, and Jianxin He
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4121–4135, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4121-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4121-2024, 2024
Short summary
A multi-instrument fuzzy logic boundary-layer-top detection algorithm
Elizabeth N. Smith and Jacob T. Carlin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4087–4107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of thermodynamic profiles retrieved from ground-based microwave and infrared observations to additional input data from active remote sensing instruments and numerical weather prediction models
Laura Bianco, Bianca Adler, Ludovic Bariteau, Irina V. Djalalova, Timothy Myers, Sergio Pezoa, David D. Turner, and James M. Wilczak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3933–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3933-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3933-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adirosi, E., Volpi, E., Lombardo, F., and Baldini, L.: Raindrop size distribution: Fitting performance of common theoretical models, Adv. Water Res., 96, 290–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.010, 2016. a
Battaglia, A., Rustemeier, E., Tokay, A., Blahak, U., and Simmer, C.: PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 27, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1, 2010. a
Berne, A. and Schleiss, M.: Retrieval of the rain drop size distribution using telecommunication dual-polarization microwave links, 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Williamsburg, VA, USA, October 2009, American Meteorological Society, https://ams.confex.com/ams/34Radar/techprogram/paper_155668.htm (last access: 9 October 2009), 2009. a
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541094, 2001. a, b
Bringi, V. N., Huang, G.-J., Chandrasekar, V., and Gorgucci, E.: A Methodology for Estimating the Parameters of a Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Model from Polarimetric Radar Data: Application to a Squall-Line Event from the TRMM/Brazil Campaign, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 19, 633–645, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0633:AMFETP>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.