Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
Research article
 | 
02 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 02 Nov 2022

A quantitative comparison of methods used to measure smaller methane emissions typically observed from superannuated oil and gas infrastructure

Stuart N. Riddick, Riley Ancona, Mercy Mbua, Clay S. Bell, Aidan Duggan, Timothy L. Vaughn, Kristine Bennett, and Daniel J. Zimmerle

Viewed

Total article views: 2,867 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,721 1,040 106 2,867 316 78 84
  • HTML: 1,721
  • PDF: 1,040
  • XML: 106
  • Total: 2,867
  • Supplement: 316
  • BibTeX: 78
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Feb 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,867 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,828 with geography defined and 39 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This describes controlled release experiments at the METEC facility in Fort Collins, USA, that investigates the accuracy and precision of five methods commonly used to measure methane emissions. Methods include static/dynamic chambers, hi flow sampling, a backward Lagrangian stochastic method, and a Gaussian plume method. This is the first time that methods for measuring CH4 emissions from point sources less than 200 g CH4 h−1 have been quantitively assessed against references and each other.
Read more