Articles | Volume 15, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
03 Nov 2022
Research article |
| 03 Nov 2022
| 03 Nov 2022
Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments
Paul A. Barrett
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Steven J. Abel
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Ian Crawford
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Amie Dobracki
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of
Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA
James Haywood
Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4PY, UK
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Steve Howell
Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa,
Honolulu, HI, USA
Anthony Jones
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4PY, UK
Justin Langridge
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Greg M. McFarquhar
School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Cooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Graeme J. Nott
FAAM Airborne Laboratory, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK
Hannah Price
FAAM Airborne Laboratory, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK
Jens Redemann
School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Yohei Shinozuka
Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
Kate Szpek
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Jonathan W. Taylor
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Robert Wood
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA, USA
Huihui Wu
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Paquita Zuidema
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of
Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA
Stéphane Bauguitte
FAAM Airborne Laboratory, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK
Ryan Bennett
Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, NASA Ames Research Centre, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA, USA
Keith Bower
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Hong Chen
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Sabrina Cochrane
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Michael Cotterell
Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4PY, UK
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK
Nicholas Davies
Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4PY, UK
Haseltine Lake Kempner, Bristol, BS1 6HU, UK
David Delene
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
Connor Flynn
School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Andrew Freedman
Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
Steffen Freitag
Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa,
Honolulu, HI, USA
Siddhant Gupta
School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Cooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
David Noone
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR, USA
Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Timothy B. Onasch
Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
James Podolske
Atmospheric Science Branch (SGG), NASA Ames Research Centre, Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA, USA
Michael R. Poellot
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
Sebastian Schmidt
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Stephen Springston
Environmental and Climate Sciences Dept., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA
Arthur J. Sedlacek III
Environmental and Climate Sciences Dept., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA
Jamie Trembath
FAAM Airborne Laboratory, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK
Alan Vance
Met Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Maria A. Zawadowicz
Environmental and Climate Sciences Dept., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA
Jianhao Zhang
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of
Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA
Clouds, Aerosols, & Climate, NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory (CSL), Boulder, CO, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 2,302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Mar 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,564 | 675 | 63 | 2,302 | 210 | 44 | 50 |
- HTML: 1,564
- PDF: 675
- XML: 63
- Total: 2,302
- Supplement: 210
- BibTeX: 44
- EndNote: 50
Total article views: 1,365 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Nov 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 968 | 359 | 38 | 1,365 | 72 | 33 | 30 |
- HTML: 968
- PDF: 359
- XML: 38
- Total: 1,365
- Supplement: 72
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 30
Total article views: 937 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Mar 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 596 | 316 | 25 | 937 | 138 | 11 | 20 |
- HTML: 596
- PDF: 316
- XML: 25
- Total: 937
- Supplement: 138
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,294 with geography defined
and 8 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,365 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,365 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 937 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 929 with geography defined
and 8 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
4 citations as recorded by crossref.
- An attribution of the low single-scattering albedo of biomass burning aerosol over the southeastern Atlantic A. Dobracki et al. 10.5194/acp-23-4775-2023
- Biomass-burning smoke's properties and its interactions with marine stratocumulus clouds in WRF-CAM5 and southeastern Atlantic field campaigns C. Howes et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023
- Cloud adjustments from large-scale smoke–circulation interactions strongly modulate the southeastern Atlantic stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition M. Diamond et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022
- Cloud processing and weeklong ageing affect biomass burning aerosol properties over the south-eastern Atlantic H. Che et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00517-3
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- An attribution of the low single-scattering albedo of biomass burning aerosol over the southeastern Atlantic A. Dobracki et al. 10.5194/acp-23-4775-2023
- Biomass-burning smoke's properties and its interactions with marine stratocumulus clouds in WRF-CAM5 and southeastern Atlantic field campaigns C. Howes et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Cloud adjustments from large-scale smoke–circulation interactions strongly modulate the southeastern Atlantic stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition M. Diamond et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022
- Cloud processing and weeklong ageing affect biomass burning aerosol properties over the south-eastern Atlantic H. Che et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00517-3
Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(8101 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(1147 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
To better understand weather and climate, it is vital to go into the field and collect observations. Often measurements take place in isolation, but here we compared data from two aircraft and one ground-based site. This was done in order to understand how well measurements made on one platform compared to those made on another. Whilst this is easy to do in a controlled laboratory setting, it is more challenging in the real world, and so these comparisons are as valuable as they are rare.
To better understand weather and climate, it is vital to go into the field and collect...
