Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5403-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5403-2023
Research article
 | 
13 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 13 Nov 2023

Estimation of 24 h continuous cloud cover using a ground-based imager with a convolutional neural network

Bu-Yo Kim, Joo Wan Cha, and Yong Hee Lee

Related authors

Twenty-four-hour cloud cover calculation using a ground-based imager with machine learning
Bu-Yo Kim, Joo Wan Cha, and Ki-Ho Chang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6695–6710, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6695-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6695-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Quantifying riming from airborne data during the HALO-(AC)3 campaign
Nina Maherndl, Manuel Moser, Johannes Lucke, Mario Mech, Nils Risse, Imke Schirmacher, and Maximilian Maahn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1475–1495, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1475-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1475-2024, 2024
Short summary
Neural network processing of holographic images
John S. Schreck, Gabrielle Gantos, Matthew Hayman, Aaron Bansemer, and David John Gagne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5793–5819, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5793-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5793-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ice crystal images from optical array probes: classification with convolutional neural networks
Louis Jaffeux, Alfons Schwarzenböck, Pierre Coutris, and Christophe Duroure
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5141–5157, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5141-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5141-2022, 2022
Short summary
Detection and analysis of cloud boundary in Xi'an, China, employing 35 GHz cloud radar aided by 1064 nm lidar
Yun Yuan, Huige Di, Yuanyuan Liu, Tao Yang, Qimeng Li, Qing Yan, Wenhui Xin, Shichun Li, and Dengxin Hua
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4989–5006, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4989-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4989-2022, 2022
Short summary
The University of Washington Ice–Liquid Discriminator (UWILD) improves single-particle phase classifications of hydrometeors within Southern Ocean clouds using machine learning
Rachel Atlas, Johannes Mohrmann, Joseph Finlon, Jeremy Lu, Ian Hsiao, Robert Wood, and Minghui Diao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7079–7101, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7079-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7079-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Al-Lahham, A., Theeb, O., Elalem, K., Alshawi, A. T., and Alshebeili, S. A.: Sky imager-based forecast of solar irradiance using machine learning, Electronics, 9, 1700, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9101700, 2020. 
Alonso-Montesinos, J.: Real-time automatic cloud detection using a low-cost sky camera, Remote Sens., 12, 1382, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091382, 2020. 
Fa, T., Xie, W., Wang, Y., and Xia, Y.: Development of an all-sky imaging system for cloud cover assessment, Appl. Opt., 58, 5516–5524, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.005516, 2019. 
Geng, Y. A., Li, Q., Lin, T., Yao, W., Xu, L., Zheng, D., Zhou, X., Zheng, L., Lyu, W., and Zhang, Y.: A deep learning framework for lightning forecasting with multi-source spatiotemporal data, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 4048–4062, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4167, 2021. 
Geng, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Han, Y., Cui, Y., and Yu, B.: Energy optimization and prediction modeling of petrochemical industries: An improved convolutional neural network based on cross-feature, Energy, 194, 116851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116851, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
A camera-based imager and convolutional neural network (CNN) were used to estimate ground cloud cover. Image data from 2019 were used for training and validation, and those from 2020 were used for testing. The CNN model exhibited high performance, with an accuracy of 0.92, RMSE of 1.40 tenths, and 93% agreement with observed cloud cover within ±2 tenths' difference. It also outperformed satellites and ceilometers and proved to be the most suitable for ground-based cloud cover estimation.