College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
Bing Geng
Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Bo Liu
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Shengnan Ji
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Junping Jing
National Ocean Technology Center, Tianjin 300112, China
Zhiping Zhu
Kunming General Survey of Natural Resources Center, China Geological Survey, Kunming 650111, China
Technology Innovation Center for Natural Ecosystem Carbon Sink, Ministry of Natural Resources, Kunming 650100, China
Ziwei Xu
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Zhanjun Quan
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,402 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,645
657
100
2,402
232
96
119
HTML: 1,645
PDF: 657
XML: 100
Total: 2,402
Supplement: 232
BibTeX: 96
EndNote: 119
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,400 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,051
279
70
1,400
106
78
100
HTML: 1,051
PDF: 279
XML: 70
Total: 1,400
Supplement: 106
BibTeX: 78
EndNote: 100
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Total article views: 1,002 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
594
378
30
1,002
126
18
19
HTML: 594
PDF: 378
XML: 30
Total: 1,002
Supplement: 126
BibTeX: 18
EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,402 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,400 with geography defined
and 2 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,400 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,400 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,002 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 977 with geography defined
and 25 with unknown origin.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements at regional scales with low cost, transport, and infrastructural requirements. This study evaluates the measurement performance in the wind field and turbulent flux of a UAV-based EC system based on the data from a set of calibration flights and standard operational flights and concludes that the system can measure the georeferenced wind vector and turbulent flux with sufficient precision.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux...
