College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
Bing Geng
Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Bo Liu
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Shengnan Ji
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Junping Jing
National Ocean Technology Center, Tianjin 300112, China
Zhiping Zhu
Kunming General Survey of Natural Resources Center, China Geological Survey, Kunming 650111, China
Technology Innovation Center for Natural Ecosystem Carbon Sink, Ministry of Natural Resources, Kunming 650100, China
Ziwei Xu
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Zhanjun Quan
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,196 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,510
598
88
2,196
204
84
108
HTML: 1,510
PDF: 598
XML: 88
Total: 2,196
Supplement: 204
BibTeX: 84
EndNote: 108
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
941
237
58
1,236
93
67
90
HTML: 941
PDF: 237
XML: 58
Total: 1,236
Supplement: 93
BibTeX: 67
EndNote: 90
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Total article views: 960 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
569
361
30
960
111
17
18
HTML: 569
PDF: 361
XML: 30
Total: 960
Supplement: 111
BibTeX: 17
EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,196 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,196 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,236 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 960 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 934 with geography defined
and 26 with unknown origin.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements at regional scales with low cost, transport, and infrastructural requirements. This study evaluates the measurement performance in the wind field and turbulent flux of a UAV-based EC system based on the data from a set of calibration flights and standard operational flights and concludes that the system can measure the georeferenced wind vector and turbulent flux with sufficient precision.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux...
