College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
Bing Geng
Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Bo Liu
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Shengnan Ji
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Junping Jing
National Ocean Technology Center, Tianjin 300112, China
Zhiping Zhu
Kunming General Survey of Natural Resources Center, China Geological Survey, Kunming 650111, China
Technology Innovation Center for Natural Ecosystem Carbon Sink, Ministry of Natural Resources, Kunming 650100, China
Ziwei Xu
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Zhanjun Quan
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,654 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,814
731
109
2,654
256
110
133
HTML: 1,814
PDF: 731
XML: 109
Total: 2,654
Supplement: 256
BibTeX: 110
EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,599 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,176
344
79
1,599
121
89
113
HTML: 1,176
PDF: 344
XML: 79
Total: 1,599
Supplement: 121
BibTeX: 89
EndNote: 113
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Total article views: 1,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
638
387
30
1,055
135
21
20
HTML: 638
PDF: 387
XML: 30
Total: 1,055
Supplement: 135
BibTeX: 21
EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,654 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,654 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,599 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,599 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,028 with geography defined
and 27 with unknown origin.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements at regional scales with low cost, transport, and infrastructural requirements. This study evaluates the measurement performance in the wind field and turbulent flux of a UAV-based EC system based on the data from a set of calibration flights and standard operational flights and concludes that the system can measure the georeferenced wind vector and turbulent flux with sufficient precision.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux...
