College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
Bing Geng
Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Bo Liu
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Shengnan Ji
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Junping Jing
National Ocean Technology Center, Tianjin 300112, China
Zhiping Zhu
Kunming General Survey of Natural Resources Center, China Geological Survey, Kunming 650111, China
Technology Innovation Center for Natural Ecosystem Carbon Sink, Ministry of Natural Resources, Kunming 650100, China
Ziwei Xu
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Zhanjun Quan
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Regional Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,095 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,454
556
85
2,095
192
81
105
HTML: 1,454
PDF: 556
XML: 85
Total: 2,095
Supplement: 192
BibTeX: 81
EndNote: 105
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Total article views: 1,158 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
896
207
55
1,158
84
64
87
HTML: 896
PDF: 207
XML: 55
Total: 1,158
Supplement: 84
BibTeX: 64
EndNote: 87
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Nov 2023)
Total article views: 937 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
558
349
30
937
108
17
18
HTML: 558
PDF: 349
XML: 30
Total: 937
Supplement: 108
BibTeX: 17
EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Feb 2023)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,095 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,093 with geography defined
and 2 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,158 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,158 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 937 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 910 with geography defined
and 27 with unknown origin.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements at regional scales with low cost, transport, and infrastructural requirements. This study evaluates the measurement performance in the wind field and turbulent flux of a UAV-based EC system based on the data from a set of calibration flights and standard operational flights and concludes that the system can measure the georeferenced wind vector and turbulent flux with sufficient precision.
Unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a versatile platform for eddy covariance (EC) flux...
