Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2777-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2777-2024
Research article
 | 
08 May 2024
Research article |  | 08 May 2024

Report on Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2B observations of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline methane leak

Matthieu Dogniaux, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Daniel J. Varon, and Ilse Aben

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1929', Philipp Hochstaffl, 31 Oct 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Matthieu Dogniaux, 16 Feb 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1929', Chris Sioris, 15 Nov 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Matthieu Dogniaux, 16 Feb 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Matthieu Dogniaux on behalf of the Authors (16 Feb 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (28 Feb 2024) by Frank Hase
AR by Matthieu Dogniaux on behalf of the Authors (07 Mar 2024)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
We analyze Landsat 8 (L8) and Sentinel-2B (S-2B) observations of the 2022 Nord Stream 2 methane leak and show how challenging this case is for usual data analysis methods. We provide customized calibrations for this Nord Stream 2 case and assess that no firm conclusion can be drawn from L8 or S-2B single overpasses. However, if we opportunistically assume that L8 and S-2B results are independent, we find an averaged L8 and S-2B combined methane leak rate of 502 ± 464 t h−1.