Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2777-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2777-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
Research article
 | 
08 May 2024
Research article |  | 08 May 2024

Report on Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2B observations of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline methane leak

Matthieu Dogniaux, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Daniel J. Varon, and Ilse Aben

Viewed

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 1,132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
972 136 24 1,132 42 22 17
  • HTML: 972
  • PDF: 136
  • XML: 24
  • Total: 1,132
  • Supplement: 42
  • BibTeX: 22
  • EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 1,132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,034 with geography defined and 98 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We analyze Landsat 8 (L8) and Sentinel-2B (S-2B) observations of the 2022 Nord Stream 2 methane leak and show how challenging this case is for usual data analysis methods. We provide customized calibrations for this Nord Stream 2 case and assess that no firm conclusion can be drawn from L8 or S-2B single overpasses. However, if we opportunistically assume that L8 and S-2B results are independent, we find an averaged L8 and S-2B combined methane leak rate of 502 ± 464 t h−1.
Read more