7 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A human-portable mass flux method for methane emissions quantification: controlled release testing performance evaluation C. Vollrath et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-583-2026
2. Application of UAV-based methods for quantifying methane point source emissions over an Arctic geological seep A. Bolek et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3983-2026
3. Drone-based methane emission estimation at waste, livestock and energy facilities: Experimental tests in Italy and challenges of wind–concentration integration with open-path sensors D. Fosco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128290
4. Evaluating the performance of a cost effective in situ methane sensor for UAS-based systems and its ability to quantify facility-scale emissions N. van Ettinger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3333-2026
5. Controlled-Release Experiment to Optimize Emission Quantification of H2 Point Sources I. Westra et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.6c00006
6. Quantitative field measurements of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury using drone-mounted high-flow rate active sampling O. Kiguchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.130069
7. Intercomparison of Methane Emission Rate Methods Using Aerial and Ground-Level Mobile Monitoring at New York State Landfills A. Catena et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00145