Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3713-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3713-2026
Research article
 | 
04 Jun 2026
Research article |  | 04 Jun 2026

Direct-sun versus sky-scan Pandora formaldehyde retrievals: implications for satellite validation and sampling representativeness in Tropical Southeast Asia

Santanasawry A. L. David Arul, Jackson Hian-Wui Chang, Yong Jie Wong, Maggie Chel-Gee Ooi, Juneng Liew, Fuei Pien Chee, Jedol Dayou, Justin Sentian, Putu Aryastana, and Neng-Huei Lin

Viewed

Total article views: 1,434 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,012 330 92 1,434 73 135
  • HTML: 1,012
  • PDF: 330
  • XML: 92
  • Total: 1,434
  • BibTeX: 73
  • EndNote: 135
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,434 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,434 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This study examines how ground-based instruments measure air pollution and how well these measurements match satellite observations over Southeast Asia. We compared two observing methods and found that one captures more detailed short-term changes, while the other provides more stable and representative results. Satellite data improved with newer technology but still showed differences. These findings help improve how scientists interpret satellite data for air quality and climate studies.
Share