Articles | Volume 11, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1639-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1639-2018
Research article
 | 
26 Mar 2018
Research article |  | 26 Mar 2018

Impact of varying lidar measurement and data processing techniques in evaluating cirrus cloud and aerosol direct radiative effects

Simone Lolli, Fabio Madonna, Marco Rosoldi, James R. Campbell, Ellsworth J. Welton, Jasper R. Lewis, Yu Gu, and Gelsomina Pappalardo

Viewed

Total article views: 2,984 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,868 1,023 93 2,984 98 94
  • HTML: 1,868
  • PDF: 1,023
  • XML: 93
  • Total: 2,984
  • BibTeX: 98
  • EndNote: 94
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jun 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,984 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,909 with geography defined and 75 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We evaluate the comparability of aerosol and cloud vertically resolved optical properties obtained with varying lidar profiling techniques and/or data processing methodologies. The discrepancies are assessed by evaluating climate-sensitive direct radiative effects, computed by radiative transfer code means. Results show important discrepancies up to 0.8 W m−2 due to lidar data smoothing in cirrus clouds and a 0.05 W m−2 difference between Raman and elastic lidar technique on a dust layer aloft.