Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3645-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3645-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Laboratory and in-flight evaluation of measurement uncertainties from a commercial Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP)
Spencer Faber
Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
82071, USA
Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
82071, USA
Robert Jackson
Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY
82071, USA
present address: Argonne National Laboratory, Environmental Science Division, Argonne,
IL 60439, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
G. Alexander Sokolowsky, Sean W. Freeman, William K. Jones, Julia Kukulies, Fabian Senf, Peter J. Marinescu, Max Heikenfeld, Kelcy N. Brunner, Eric C. Bruning, Scott M. Collis, Robert C. Jackson, Gabrielle R. Leung, Nils Pfeifer, Bhupendra A. Raut, Stephen M. Saleeby, Philip Stier, and Susan C. van den Heever
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5309–5330, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Building on previous analysis tools developed for atmospheric science, the original release of the Tracking and Object-Based Analysis (tobac) Python package, v1.2, was open-source, modular, and insensitive to the type of gridded input data. Here, we present the latest version of tobac, v1.5, which substantially improves scientific capabilities and computational efficiency from the previous version. These enhancements permit new uses for tobac in atmospheric science and potentially other fields.
Bhupendra A. Raut, Paytsar Muradyan, Rajesh Sankaran, Robert C. Jackson, Seongha Park, Sean A. Shahkarami, Dario Dematties, Yongho Kim, Joseph Swantek, Neal Conrad, Wolfgang Gerlach, Sergey Shemyakin, Pete Beckman, Nicola J. Ferrier, and Scott M. Collis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1195–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1195-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1195-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the stability of a blockwise phase correlation (PC) method to estimate cloud motion using a total sky imager (TSI). Shorter frame intervals and larger block sizes improve stability, while image resolution and color channels have minor effects. Raindrop contamination can be identified by the rotational motion of the TSI mirror. The correlations of cloud motion vectors (CMVs) from the PC method with wind data vary from 0.38 to 0.59. Optical flow vectors are more stable than PC vectors.
David E. Kingsmill, Jeffrey R. French, and Neil P. Lareau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses in situ aircraft measurements to characterize the size and shape distributions of 10 µm to 6 mm diameter particles observed during six penetrations of wildfire-induced pyroconvection. Particles sampled in one penetration of a smoke plume are most likely pyrometeors composed of ash. The other penetrations are through pyrocumulus clouds where particle composition is most likely a combination of hydrometeors (ice particles) and pyrometeors (ash).
Israel Silber, Robert C. Jackson, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Scott Collis, Johannes Verlinde, and Jiachen Ding
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 901–927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth Model Column Collaboratory (EMC2) is an open-source ground-based (and air- or space-borne) lidar and radar simulator and subcolumn generator designed for large-scale models, in particular climate models, applicable also for high-resolution models. EMC2 emulates measurements while remaining faithful to large-scale models' physical assumptions implemented in their cloud or radiation schemes. We demonstrate the use of EMC2 to compare AWARE measurements with the NASA GISS ModelE3 and LES.
Robert Jackson, Scott Collis, Valentin Louf, Alain Protat, Die Wang, Scott Giangrande, Elizabeth J. Thompson, Brenda Dolan, and Scott W. Powell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 53–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-53-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-53-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
About 4 years of 2D video disdrometer data in Darwin are used to develop and validate rainfall retrievals for tropical convection in C- and X-band radars in Darwin. Using blended techniques previously used for Colorado and Manus and Gan islands, with modified coefficients in each estimator, provided the most optimal results. Using multiple radar observables to develop a rainfall retrieval provided a greater advantage than using a single observable, including using specific attenuation.
Adam Majewski and Jeffrey R. French
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5035–5054, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5035-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5035-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The study reports formation of supercooled drizzle drops in response to repeating kilometer-wide updrafts and downdrafts within a mixed-phase, mountain-layer cloud containing very little ice despite cold cloud top temperatures (T ~ -30°C). The discrete, embedded hydrometeor growth layers and downwind transition to drizzle production at cloud top indicates the relative importance of kinematic mechanisms in determining the location of precipitation development in cloud.
Ann M. Fridlind, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Scott Collis, Scott E. Giangrande, Robert C. Jackson, Xiaowen Li, Toshihisa Matsui, Richard Orville, Mark H. Picel, Daniel Rosenfeld, Alexander Ryzhkov, Richard Weitz, and Pengfei Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2979–3000, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2979-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2979-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Weather radars are offering improved capabilities to investigate storm physics, which remain poorly understood. We investigate enhanced use of such data near Houston, Texas, where pollution sources often provide a convenient contrast between polluted and clean air. We conclude that Houston is a favorable location to conduct a future field campaign during June through September because isolated storms are common and tend to last an hour, allowing frequent observations of a full life cycle.
Robert C. Jackson, Scott M. Collis, Valentin Louf, Alain Protat, and Leon Majewski
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17687–17704, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17687-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17687-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper looks at a 17 year database of echo top heights of thunderstorms in Darwin retrieved by CPOL. We find that the echo top heights are generally bimodal, corresponding to cumulus congestus and deep convection, and show a greater bimodality during an inactive MJO. Furthermore, we find that convective cell areas are larger in break conditions compared to monsoon conditions, but only during MJO-inactive conditions.
Robert Jackson, Jeffrey R. French, David C. Leon, David M. Plummer, Sonia Lasher-Trapp, Alan M. Blyth, and Alexei Korolev
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15329–15344, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15329-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15329-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper looks at microphysical observations of growing cumulus clouds in the southwest United Kingdom sampled during the COnvective Precipitation Experiment (COPE). Our results suggest that secondary ice production processes are contributing to the observed concentrations and that entrainment of particles from remnant cloud layers may have acted to aid in secondary ice production.
Jing Yang, Zhien Wang, Andrew J. Heymsfield, and Jeffrey R. French
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10159–10173, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10159-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10159-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides statistics of the vertical air motion characteristics in convective clouds using aircraft in situ measurements from three field campaigns. Small-scale drafts are frequently observed and make important contributions to total air mass flux. The probability density functions and profiles of the observed vertical velocity and air mass flux are provided. The differences among the three field campaigns are compared. Factors influencing the vertical air motions are discussed.
Alexei Korolev, Alex Khain, Mark Pinsky, and Jeffrey French
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9235–9254, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9235-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9235-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Relationships between basic microphysical parameters are studied within the framework of homogeneous and extreme inhomogeneous mixing. Analytical expressions and numerical simulations of relationships between droplet concentration, extinction coefficient, liquid water content, and mean volume droplet size are presented. The obtained relationships between moments are used to identify type of mixing for in situ observations obtained in convective clouds.
Related subject area
Subject: Clouds | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Applicability of the low-cost OPC-N3 optical particle counter for microphysical measurements of fog
A study of optical scattering modelling for mixed-phase polar stratospheric clouds
Technique for comparison of backscatter coefficients derived from in situ cloud probe measurements with concurrent airborne lidar
Intercomparison of holographic imaging and single-particle forward light scattering in situ measurements of liquid clouds in changing atmospheric conditions
Design and field campaign validation of a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle and optical particle counter
In situ cloud ground-based measurements in the Finnish sub-Arctic: intercomparison of three cloud spectrometer setups
Evaluation of cloud properties from reanalyses over East Asia with a radiance-based approach
A statistical comparison of cirrus particle size distributions measured using the 2-D stereo probe during the TC4, SPARTICUS, and MACPEX flight campaigns with historical cirrus datasets
Comparing the cloud vertical structure derived from several methods based on radiosonde profiles and ground-based remote sensing measurements
A comparison of light backscattering and particle size distribution measurements in tropical cirrus clouds
Cloud particle size distributions measured with an airborne digital in-line holographic instrument
Katarzyna Nurowska, Moein Mohammadi, Szymon Malinowski, and Krzysztof Markowicz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2415–2430, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2415-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2415-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we evaluate the low-cost Alphasense OPC-N3 optical particle counter for measurements of fog microphysics. We compare OPC-N3 with the Oxford Lasers VisiSize D30. This work is significant because OPC-N3 can be used with drones for vertical profiles in fog.
Francesco Cairo, Terry Deshler, Luca Di Liberto, Andrea Scoccione, and Marcel Snels
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 419–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-419-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-419-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The T-matrix theory was used to compute the backscatter and depolarization of mixed-phase PSC, assuming that particles are solid (NAT or possibly ice) above a threshold radius R and liquid (STS) below, and a single shape is common to all solid particles. We used a dataset of coincident lidar and balloon-borne backscattersonde and OPC measurements. The agreement between modelled and measured backscatter is reasonable and allows us to constrain the parameters R and AR.
Shawn Wendell Wagner and David James Delene
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6447–6466, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Jet engine power loss due to ice accumulation is a hazard in high-altitude clouds. A potential tool for informing pilots when entering such clouds is an onboard lidar system. Lidar and wing-mounted probe backscatter coefficients agree within uncertainties for liquid clouds but not for ice clouds. The lidar measurements are correlated with total water content over a broad range of environments, which indicates that the lidar system is useful for detecting hazardous ice cloud conditions.
Petri Tiitta, Ari Leskinen, Ville A. Kaikkonen, Eero O. Molkoselkä, Anssi J. Mäkynen, Jorma Joutsensaari, Silvia Calderon, Sami Romakkaniemi, and Mika Komppula
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2993–3009, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2993-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2993-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The novel holographic imaging instrument (ICEMET) was adapted to measure the microphysical properties of liquid clouds, and these values were compared with parallel measurements of a cloud droplet spectrometer (FM-120) and particle measurements using a twin-inlet system. When the intercomparison was carried out during isoaxial sampling, our results showed good agreement in terms of variability between the instruments. This agreement was confirmed using Mutual and Pearson correlation analyses.
Joseph Girdwood, Helen Smith, Warren Stanley, Zbigniew Ulanowski, Chris Stopford, Charles Chemel, Konstantinos-Matthaios Doulgeris, David Brus, David Campbell, and Robert Mackenzie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6613–6630, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6613-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6613-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the design and validation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with a bespoke optical particle counter (OPC). This is used to monitor atmospheric particles, which have significant effects on our weather and climate. These effects are hard to characterise properly, partly because they occur in regions that are not commonly accessible to traditional instrumentation. Our new platform gives us the capability to access these regions.
Konstantinos-Matthaios Doulgeris, Mika Komppula, Sami Romakkaniemi, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and David Brus
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5129–5147, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5129-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5129-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We intercompared three cloud spectrometers ground setups in conditions with frequently occurring supercooled clouds. The measurements were conducted during the Pallas Cloud Experiment (PaCE) in 2013, in the Finnish sub-Arctic region at Sammaltunturi station. The main meteorological parameters influencing the spectrometers' performance was the wind direction. Final recommendations and our view on the main limitations of each spectrometer ground setup are presented.
Bin Yao, Chao Liu, Yan Yin, Zhiquan Liu, Chunxiang Shi, Hironobu Iwabuchi, and Fuzhong Weng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1033–1049, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1033-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1033-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Due to the complex spatiotemporal and physical properties of clouds, their quantitative depictions in different atmospheric reanalysis datasets are still highly uncertain. A radiance-based evaluation approach is developed to evaluate the quality of cloud properties by directly comparing them with satellite radiance observations. ERA5 and CRA are found to have great capability in representing the cloudy atmosphere over East Asia, and MERRA-2 tends to slightly overestimate clouds over the region.
M. Christian Schwartz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3041–3055, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3041-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3041-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of ice cloud particle populations are needed to improve climate and weather prediction. This paper makes a comparison between ice cloud particle populations measured using two different airborne cloud particle probes. It is concluded that measurements of particle populations from older probes are similar to those from newer probes, except in total numbers of particles counted. Therefore, more airborne studies of ice clouds need to be made using newer cloud particle probes.
M. Costa-Surós, J. Calbó, J. A. González, and C. N. Long
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2757–2773, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2757-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2757-2014, 2014
F. Cairo, G. Di Donfrancesco, M. Snels, F. Fierli, M. Viterbini, S. Borrmann, and W. Frey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 557–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-557-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-557-2011, 2011
J. P. Fugal and R. A. Shaw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 259–271, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-259-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-259-2009, 2009
Cited articles
Abel, S. J., Cotton, R. J., Barrett, P. A., and Vance, A. K.: A comparison of ice water
content measurement techniques on the FAAM BAe-146 aircraft, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7,
3007–3022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3007-2014, 2014.
Baumgardner, D., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Cotton, R., Crosier, J., Field, P.,
Gurganus, C., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Kramer, M., Lawson, P.,
McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Um, J.: Cloud Ice Properties: In Situ Measurement
Challenges, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 9.1–9.23,
https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0011.1, 2017
Baumgardner, D. and Spowart, M.: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering
Spectrometer Probe, Part III: Time Response and Laser Imhomogeneity
Limitations, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 7, 666–672, 1990.
Baumgardner, D., Strapp, J. W., and Dye J. E.: Evaluation of the Forward
Scattering Spectrometer Probe, Part II: Corrections for Coincidence and
Dead-Time Losses, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 2, 626–632,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1985)002<0626:EOTFSS>2.0.CO;2,
1985.
Brenguier, J. L., Baumgardner, D., and Baker, B.: A review and discussion of
processing algorithms for FSSP concentration measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 11, 1409–1414, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<1409:ARADOP>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Brenguier, J. L., Bourrianne, T., De Coelho, A. A., Isbert, J., Peytavi, R.,
Trevarin, D., and Weschler, P.: Improvements of droplet size distribution
measurements with the fast-FSSP (Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe), J.
Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 15, 1077–1090,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<1077:IODSDM>2.0.CO;2,
1998.
Cooper, W. A.: Effects of Coincidence on Measurements with a Forward
Scattering Spectrometer Probe, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 5, 823–832,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1988)005<0823:EOCOMW>2.0.CO;2,
1988.
Dye, J. E. and Baumgardner, D.: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering
Spectrometer Probe, Part I: Electronic and Optical Studies, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 1, 329–344, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1984)001<0329:EOTFSS>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Field, P. R., Wood, R., Brown, P. R. A., Kaye, P. H., Hirst, E., Greenaway,
R., and Smith, J. A.: Ice particle interarrival times measured with a fast
FSSP, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 20, 249–261, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0249:IPITMW>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
French, J. R., Friedrich, K., Tessendorf, S., Rauber, R., Geerts, B.,
Rasmussen, R., Xue, L., Kunkel, M., and Blestrud, D.: Precipitation
Formation from Orographic Cloud Seeding, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115, 1168–1173, 2018.
Gardiner, B. A. and Hallet, J.: Degradation of In-Cloud Forward Scattering
Spectrometer Probe Measurements in the Presence of Ice Particles, J. Atmos.
Ocean. Technol., 2.2, 171–180, 1985.
Heymsfield, A. J.: On measurements of small ice particles in clouds.
Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030951, 2007.
Khanal, S.: Evaluation of airborne radar-lidar retrieval of ice water
content using in situ probes, M.S. Thesis, University of Wyoming, 2013.
King, W. D., Parkin, D. A., and Handsworth, R. J.: A Hot-Wire Liquid Water
Device Having Fully Calculable Response Characteristics, J. Appl. Meteorol.,
17, 1809–1813,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<1809:AHWLWD>2.0.CO;2.
1978.
Knollenberg, R. G.: Practical Applications of Low Power Lasers, SPIE, 92,
137–152, 1976.
Korolev, A. V., Kuznetsov, S. V., Makarov, Y. E., and Novikov, V. S.:
Evaluation of measurements of particle size and sample area from optical
array probes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 8, 514–522,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1991)008<0514:EOMOPS>2.0.CO;2,
1991.
Korolev, A. V, Strapp, J. W., Isaac, G. A., and Nevzorov, A. N.: The
Nevzorov airborne hot-wire LWC-TWC probe: Principle of operation and
performance characteristics, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 15, 1495–1510,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<1495:TNAHWL>2.0.CO;2,
1998.
Korolev, A. and Isaac, G. A.: Shattering during Sampling by OAPs and HVPS .
Part I?: Snow Particles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 22, 528–542, 2005.
Korolev, A., Strapp, J. W., Isaac, G. A., and Emery, E.: Improved airborne
hot-wire measurements of ice water content in clouds, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 30, 2121–2131, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00007.1, 2013.
Lance, S., Brock, C. A., Rogers, D., and Gordon, J. A.: Water droplet calibration
of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and in-flight performance in liquid, ice and mixed-phase
clouds during ARCPAC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1683–1706, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1683-2010, 2010.
Lance, S.: Coincidence errors in a cloud droplet probe (CDP) and a cloud and
aerosol spectrometer (CAS), and the improved performance of a modified CDP, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.,
29, 1532–1541, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00208.1,
2012.
McFarquhar, G. M., Um, J., Freer, M., Baumgardner, D., Kok, G. L., and Mace,
G.: Importance of small ice crystals to cirrus properties?: Observations
from the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029865, 2007.
McFarquhar, G. M., Baumgardner, D., Bansemer, A., Abel, S. J., Crosier, J.,
French, J., Rosenberg, P., Korolev, A., Schwarzoenboeck, A., Leroy, D., Um,
J., Wu, W., Heymsfield, A. J., Twohy, C., Detwiler, A., Field, P., Neumann,
A. and Axisa, D.: Processing of Ice Cloud In-Situ Data Collected by Bulk
Water, Scattering and Imaging Probes: Fundamentals, Uncertainties and
Efforts towards Consistency, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 11.1–11.33,
https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0007.1, 2017.
Nagel, D., Maixner, U., Strapp, J. W., and Wasey, M.: Advancements in
techniques for calibration and characterization of in situ optical particle
measuring probes, and applications to the FSSP-100 probe, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 24, 745–760, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2006.1, 2007.
Pinnick, R. G., Garvey, D. M., and Duncan, L. D.: Calibration of Knollenberg
FSSP Light-Scattering Counters for Measurement of Cloud Droplets, J. Appl.
Meteor., 20, 1049–1057, 1981.
Rosenberg, P. D., Dean, A. R., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J. R., Minikin, A.,
Pickering, M. A., and Petzold, A.:
Particle sizing calibration with refractive index correction for light
scattering optical particle counters and impacts upon PCASP and CDP data collected
during the Fennec campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1147–1163, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1147-2012, 2012.
Schmidt, S., Lehmann, K., and Wendisch, M.: Minimizing instrumental
broadening of the drop size distribution with the M-Fast-FSSP, J. Atmos.
Ocean. Tech., 21, 1855–1867., 2004.
Schwarzenboeck, A., Mioche, G., Armetta, A., Herber, A., and Gayet, J.-F.:
Response of the Nevzorov hot wire probe in clouds dominated by droplet conditions
in the drizzle size range, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 779–788, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-779-2009, 2009.
Strapp, J. W., Oldenburg, J., Ide, R., Lilie, L., Bacic, S., Vukovic, Z.,
Oleskiw, M., Miller, D., Emery, E., and Leone, G.: Wind tunnel measurements
of the response of hot-wire liquid water content instruments to large
droplets, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 20, 791–806,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0791:WTMOTR>2.0.CO;2,
2003.
Wang, Z., French, J., Vali, G., Wechsler, P. and Haimov, S.: Single Aircraft
Integration of Remote Sensing and In-situ Sampling for the Study of Cloud
Microphysics and Dynamics, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00044.1, 2012.
Wendisch, M., Keil, A., and Korolev, A. V.: FSSP characterization with
monodisperse water droplets, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 1152–1165,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<1152:FCWMWD>2.0.CO;2,
1996.
Wendisch, M. and Brenguier, J.-L.: Airborne measurements for environmental
research: methods and instruments, John Wiley & Sons, 641, ISBN:978-3-527-40996-9, 2013.
Short summary
Laboratory and in-flight evaluations of uncertainties of measurements from a cloud droplet probe are presented. This study extends results of earlier studies by examining instrument response over a greater range of droplet sizes throughout the entire sample volume. Errors in droplet sizing based on the laboratory measurements tend to be less than 10 %, significantly less than typically quoted sizing accuracy for this class of instrument.
Laboratory and in-flight evaluations of uncertainties of measurements from a cloud droplet probe...