Articles | Volume 13, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1157-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1157-2020
Research article
 | 
09 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 09 Mar 2020

An automated method for preparing and calibrating electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes

Francis J. Schmidlin and Bruno A. Hoegger

Related authors

Validation of 10-year SAO OMI Ozone Profile (PROFOZ) product using ozonesonde observations
Guanyu Huang, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance, Kai Yang, Pawan K. Bhartia, Zhaonan Cai, Marc Allaart, Gérard Ancellet, Bertrand Calpini, Gerrie J. R. Coetzee, Emilio Cuevas-Agulló, Manuel Cupeiro, Hugo De Backer, Manvendra K. Dubey, Henry E. Fuelberg, Masatomo Fujiwara, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Tristan J. Hall, Bryan Johnson, Everette Joseph, Rigel Kivi, Bogumil Kois, Ninong Komala, Gert König-Langlo, Giovanni Laneve, Thierry Leblanc, Marion Marchand, Kenneth R. Minschwaner, Gary Morris, Michael J. Newchurch, Shin-Ya Ogino, Nozomu Ohkawara, Ankie J. M. Piters, Françoise Posny, Richard Querel, Rinus Scheele, Frank J. Schmidlin, Russell C. Schnell, Otto Schrems, Henry Selkirk, Masato Shiotani, Pavla Skrivánková, René Stübi, Ghassan Taha, David W. Tarasick, Anne M. Thompson, Valérie Thouret, Matthew B. Tully, Roeland Van Malderen, Holger Vömel, Peter von der Gathen, Jacquelyn C. Witte, and Margarita Yela
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2455–2475, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2455-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2455-2017, 2017
Short summary
Methods to homogenize electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde measurements across changes in sensing solution concentration or ozonesonde manufacturer
Terry Deshler, Rene Stübi, Francis J. Schmidlin, Jennifer L. Mercer, Herman G. J. Smit, Bryan J. Johnson, Rigel Kivi, and Bruno Nardi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2021–2043, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017, 2017
Short summary
Simultaneous and co-located wind measurements in the middle atmosphere by lidar and rocket-borne techniques
Franz-Josef Lübken, Gerd Baumgarten, Jens Hildebrand, and Francis J. Schmidlin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3911–3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3911-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3911-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Measuring diameters and velocities of artificial raindrops with a neuromorphic event camera
Kire Micev, Jan Steiner, Asude Aydin, Jörg Rieckermann, and Tobi Delbruck
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 335–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-335-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-335-2024, 2024
Short summary
Pre-launch calibration and validation of the Airborne Hyper-Angular Rainbow Polarimeter (AirHARP) instrument
Brent A. McBride, J. Vanderlei Martins, J. Dominik Cieslak, Roberto Fernandez-Borda, Anin Puthukuddy, Xiaoguang Xu, Noah Sienkiewicz, Brian Cairns, and Henrique M. J. Barbosa
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-865,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-865, 2023
Short summary
Optimization of a Picarro L2140-i cavity ring-down spectrometer for routine measurement of triple oxygen isotope ratios in meteoric waters
Jack A. Hutchings and Bronwen L. Konecky
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1663–1682, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1663-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1663-2023, 2023
Short summary
Improving continuous-flow analysis of triple oxygen isotopes in ice cores: insights from replicate measurements
Lindsey Davidge, Eric J. Steig, and Andrew J. Schauer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7337–7351, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7337-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7337-2022, 2022
Short summary
Contactless optical hygrometry in LACIS-T
Jakub L. Nowak, Robert Grosz, Wiebke Frey, Dennis Niedermeier, Jędrzej Mijas, Szymon P. Malinowski, Linda Ort, Silvio Schmalfuß, Frank Stratmann, Jens Voigtländer, and Tadeusz Stacewicz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4075–4089, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4075-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4075-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Barnes, R. A., Bandy, A. R., and Torres, A. L.: Electrochemical Concentration Cell ozonesonde accuracy and precision, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7881–7887, 1985. 
Deshler, T., Mercer, J. L., Smit, H. G. J., Stubi, R., Levrat, G., Johnson, B. J., Oltmans, S. J., Kivi, R., Thompson, A. M., Witte, J., Davies, J., Schmidlin, F. J., Brothers, G., and Sasaki, T.: Atmospheric comparison of electrochemical cell ozonesondes from different manufacturers, and with different cathode solution strengths: The Balloon Experiment on Standards for Ozonesondes, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D04307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008975, 2008. 
Deshler, T., Stübi, R., Schmidlin, F. J., Mercer, J. L., Smit, H. G. J., Johnson, B. J., Kivi, R., and Nardi, B.: Methods to homogenize electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde measurements across changes in sensing solution concentration or ozonesonde manufacturer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2021–2043, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017, 2017. 
Fishman, J., Wozniak, A. E., and Creilson, J. K.: Global distribution of tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements using the empirically corrected tropospheric ozone residual technique: Identification of the regional aspects of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 893–907, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-893-2003, 2003. 
Harris, J. M., Oltmans, S. J., Bodeker, G. E., Stolarski, R., Evans, R. D., and Quincy, D. M.: Long-term variations in total ozone derived from Dobson and satellite data, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3167–3175, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00347-9, 2003. 
Download
Short summary
The procedure for preparing electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes are considered to be standardized, but there remains the question of actual measurement accuracy, believed to be 5–10 %. It would be ideal to include a reference instrument on the balloon flight to aid in checking ECC accuracy and reliability. Balloon-borne reference instruments are not usually available, mostly because they are too expensive for other than occasional use.