Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4403-2021
Research article
 | 
15 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2021

On the estimation of boundary layer heights: a machine learning approach

Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Larry K. Berg, Heng Xiao, Po-Lun Ma, and David D. Turner

Related authors

Operational wind plants increase planetary boundary layer height: An observational study
Aliza Abraham, Matteo Puccioni, Arianna Jordan, Emina Maric, Nicola Bodini, Nicholas Hamilton, Stefano Letizia, Petra M. Klein, Elizabeth Smith, Sonia Wharton, Jonathan Gero, Jamey D. Jacob, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob K. Newsom, Mikhail Pekour, and Patrick Moriarty
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-148,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-148, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation of an atmospheric bore and associated gravity wave effects on wind farm performance in the Southern Great Plains
Adam S. Wise, Robert S. Arthur, Aliza Abraham, Sonia Wharton, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob Newsom, Brian Hirth, John Schroeder, Patrick Moriarty, and Fotini K. Chow
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-84,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-84, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Linking weather patterns to observed and modelled turbine hub-height winds offshore U.S. West Coast
Ye Liu, Timothy W. Juliano, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Brian J. Gaudet, and Jungmin Lee
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-76,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-76, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary
The 2023 National Offshore Wind data set (NOW-23)
Nicola Bodini, Mike Optis, Stephanie Redfern, David Rosencrans, Alex Rybchuk, Julie K. Lundquist, Vincent Pronk, Simon Castagneri, Avi Purkayastha, Caroline Draxl, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Ethan Young, Billy Roberts, Evan Rosenlieb, and Walter Musial
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1965–2006, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1965-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1965-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observations of wind farm wake recovery at an operating wind farm
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Rob Newsom, Colleen Kaul, Stefano Letizia, Mikhail Pekour, Nicholas Hamilton, Duli Chand, Donna M. Flynn, Nicola Bodini, and Patrick Moriarty
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-29,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-29, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for WES
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Sampling the diurnal and annual cycles of the Earth's energy imbalance with constellations of satellite-borne radiometers
Thomas Hocking, Thorsten Mauritsen, and Linda Megner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7077–7095, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of top-of-atmosphere fluxes from combined EarthCARE lidar, imager, and broadband radiometer observations: the BMA-FLX product
Almudena Velázquez Blázquez, Carlos Domenech, Edward Baudrez, Nicolas Clerbaux, Carla Salas Molar, and Nils Madenach
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 7007–7026, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7007-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-7007-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of the measurement uncertainty for a 3D wind lidar
Wolf Knöller, Gholamhossein Bagheri, Philipp von Olshausen, and Michael Wilczek
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6913–6931, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6913-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6913-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improving solution availability and temporal consistency of an optimal-estimation physical retrieval for ground-based thermodynamic boundary layer profiling
Bianca Adler, David D. Turner, Laura Bianco, Irina V. Djalalova, Timothy Myers, and James M. Wilczak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6603–6624, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6603-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6603-2024, 2024
Short summary
An improved geolocation methodology for spaceborne radar and lidar systems
Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras and Pavlos Kollias
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6301–6314, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6301-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Balloon-Borne Sounding System (SONDEWNPN). Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), updated hourly, compiled by: Keeler, E., Ritsche, M., Coulter, R., Kyrouac, J., and Holdridge, D., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1021460, 2001. 
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Constrained Variational Analysis (60VARANARUC). Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), compiled by: Tao, C. and Xie, S., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1647300, 2004. 
Banakh, V. A., Smalikho, I. N., and Falits, A. V.: Estimation of the height of the turbulent mixing layer from data of Doppler lidar measurements using conical scanning by a probe beam, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1511–1524, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1511-2021, 2021. 
Berg, L. K., Newsom, R. K., and Turner, D. D.: Year-long vertical velocity statistics derived from Doppler lidar data for the continental convective boundary layer, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 2441–2454, 2017. 
Biraud, S., Billesbach, D., and Chan, S.: ECOR: 30-minute averaged surface vertical fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, and latent heat at Southern Great Plains central facility, DOE Office of Science Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program (United States) [data set], available at: https://adc.arm.gov/discovery/#/results/datastream::sgpco2flx25mC1.b1 (last access: 7 March 2020), 2015. 
Download
Short summary
Planetary boundary layer (PBL) height is a critical parameter in atmospheric models. Continuous PBL height measurements from remote sensing measurements are important to understand various boundary layer mechanisms, especially during daytime and evening transition periods. Due to several limitations in existing methodologies to detect PBL height from a Doppler lidar, in this study, a machine learning (ML) approach is tested. The ML model is observed to improve the accuracy by over 50 %.