Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3837-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3837-2016
Research article
 | 
18 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 18 Aug 2016

Close-range radar rainfall estimation and error analysis

C. Z. van de Beek, H. Leijnse, P. Hazenberg, and R. Uijlenhoet

Related authors

Barriers to urban hydrometeorological simulation: a review
Xuan Chen, Job Augustijn van der Werf, Arjan Droste, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3447–3480, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3447-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3447-2025, 2025
Short summary
Rain-on-wet-soil compound floods in lowlands: the combined effect of large rain events and shallow groundwater on discharge peaks in a changing climate
Claudia C. Brauer, Ruben O. Imhoff, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1712,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1712, 2025
Short summary
Torrential rainfall in Valencia (Spain) recorded by personal weather stations preceding and during the 29 October 2024 floods
Nathalie Rombeek, Markus Hrachowitz, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1502,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1502, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Evaporation measurements using commercial microwave links as scintillometers
Luuk D. van der Valk, Oscar K. Hartogensis, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Rolf W. Hut, and Remko Uijlenhoet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1128,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1128, 2025
Short summary
The Dutch real-time gauge-adjusted radar precipitation product
Aart Overeem, Hidde Leijnse, Mats Veldhuizen, and Bastiaan Anker
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-160,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-160, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Propagating information content: an example with advection
David D. Turner, Maria P. Cadeddu, Julia M. Simonson, and Timothy J. Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3533–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3533-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Best estimate of the planetary boundary layer height from multiple remote sensing measurements
Damao Zhang, Jennifer Comstock, Chitra Sivaraman, Kefei Mo, Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Jingjing Tian, Tianning Su, Zhanqing Li, and Natalia Roldán-Henao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3453–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3453-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observing atmospheric rivers using multi-GNSS airborne radio occultation: system description and data evaluation
Bing Cao, Jennifer S. Haase, Michael J. Murphy Jr., and Anna M. Wilson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3361–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3361-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evolution of wind field in the atmospheric boundary layer using multiple-source observations during the passage of Super Typhoon Doksuri (2305)
Xiaoye Wang, Jing Xu, Songhua Wu, Qichao Wang, Guangyao Dai, Peizhi Zhu, Zhizhong Su, Sai Chen, Xiaomeng Shi, and Mengqi Fan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3305–3320, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3305-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3305-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observed impact of the GNSS clock data rate on radio occultation bending angles for Sentinel-6A and COSMIC-2
Sebastiano Padovan, Axel von Engeln, Saverio Paolella, Yago Andres, Chad R. Galley, Riccardo Notarpietro, Veronica Rivas Boscan, Francisco Sancho, Francisco Martin Alemany, Nicolas Morew, and Christian Marquardt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3217–3228, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3217-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3217-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Andrieu, H., Delrieu, G., and Creutin, J.-D.: Identification of vertical profiles of radar reflectivity for hydrological applications using an inverse method, Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and case study, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 240–259, 1995.
Andrieu, H., Creutin, J.-D., and Faure, D.: Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area, Part I: Radar measurement interpretation, J. Hydrol., 193, 1–25, 1997.
Battan, L. J.: Radar Observation of the Atmosphere, University of Chicago Press, 324 pp., 1973.
Beekhuis, H. and Holleman, I.: From pulse to product, highlights of the digital-IF upgrade of the Dutch national radar network, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, Helsinki, Finland, 30 June–4 July, 2008.
Beekhuis, H. and Leijnse, H.: An operational radar monitoring tool, proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, Toulouse, France, paper 47DQ, 25–29 June, 2012.
Download
Short summary
Quantitative precipitation estimation using weather radar is affected by many sources of error. This study is an attempt to separate and quantify sources of error very close to the radar. A 3-day event is analyzed using radar, rain gauge and disdrometer data. Without correction, the radar severely underestimates the total rain amount by more than 50 %. After correction for the errors, a good match with rain gauge measurements is found, with 5 to 8 % difference.
Share