Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-703-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-703-2019
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2019
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2019

Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version 4.1 data products

Zhaoyan Liu, Jayanta Kar, Shan Zeng, Jason Tackett, Mark Vaughan, Melody Avery, Jacques Pelon, Brian Getzewich, Kam-Pui Lee, Brian Magill, Ali Omar, Patricia Lucker, Charles Trepte, and David Winker

Related authors

Comment on "Design study for an airborne N2O lidar" by Kiemle et al. (2024)
Joel F. Campbell, Bing Lin, and Zhaoyan Liu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1448,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1448, 2025
Short summary
Martian column CO2 and pressure measurement with spaceborne differential absorption lidar at 1.96 µm
Zhaoyan Liu, Bing Lin, Joel F. Campbell, Jirong Yu, Jihong Geng, and Shibin Jiang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2977–2990, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2977-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2977-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing the benefits of Imaging Infrared Radiometer observations for the CALIOP version 4 cloud and aerosol discrimination algorithm
Thibault Vaillant de Guélis, Gérard Ancellet, Anne Garnier, Laurent C.-Labonnote, Jacques Pelon, Mark A. Vaughan, Zhaoyan Liu, and David M. Winker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1931–1956, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1931-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1931-2022, 2022
Short summary
Airborne lidar observations of wind, water vapor, and aerosol profiles during the NASA Aeolus calibration and validation (Cal/Val) test flight campaign
Kristopher M. Bedka, Amin R. Nehrir, Michael Kavaya, Rory Barton-Grimley, Mark Beaubien, Brian Carroll, James Collins, John Cooney, G. David Emmitt, Steven Greco, Susan Kooi, Tsengdar Lee, Zhaoyan Liu, Sharon Rodier, and Gail Skofronick-Jackson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4305–4334, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4305-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4305-2021, 2021
Short summary
Two-dimensional and multi-channel feature detection algorithm for the CALIPSO lidar measurements
Thibault Vaillant de Guélis, Mark A. Vaughan, David M. Winker, and Zhaoyan Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1593–1613, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1593-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1593-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Extension of AVHRR-based climate data records: exploring ways to simulate AVHRR radiances from Suomi NPP VIIRS data
Karl-Göran Karlsson, Nina Håkansson, Salomon Eliasson, Erwin Wolters, and Ronald Scheirer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3833–3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3833-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3833-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improved simulation of thunderstorm characteristics and polarimetric signatures with LIMA two-moment microphysics in AROME
Cloé David, Clotilde Augros, Benoit Vié, François Bouttier, and Tony Le Bastard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3715–3745, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3715-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3715-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessment of horizontally oriented ice crystals with a combination of multiangle polarization lidar and cloud Doppler radar
Zhaolong Wu, Patric Seifert, Yun He, Holger Baars, Haoran Li, Cristofer Jimenez, Chengcai Li, and Albert Ansmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3611–3634, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3611-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3611-2025, 2025
Short summary
Benchmarking and improving algorithms for attributing satellite-observed contrails to flights
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3495–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3495-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3495-2025, 2025
Short summary
Riming-dependent snowfall rate and ice water content retrievals for W-band cloud radar
Nina Maherndl, Alessandro Battaglia, Anton Kötsche, and Maximilian Maahn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3287–3304, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3287-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Avery, M., Ryan, R., Getzewich, B., Vaughan, M., Winker, D., Hu, Y., Trepte, C., Garnier, A., Pelon, J., Cai, X., and Verhappen, C. A.: Impact of Near-Nadir Viewing Angles on CALIOP V4.1 Cloud Thermodynamic Phase Assignments, in preparation, 2018. 
Behrenfeld, M. J., Hu, Y., O'Malley, R. T., Boss, E. S., Hostetler, C. A., Siegel, D. A., Sarmiento, J. L., Schulien, J., Hair, J. W., Lu, X., Rodier, S., and Scarino, A. J.: Annual boom-bust cycles of polar phytoplankton biomass revealed by space-based lidar, Nat. Geosci., 10, 118–122, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2861, 2017. 
Campbell, J. R., Vaughan, M. A., Oo, M., Holz, R. E., Lewis, J. R., and Welton, E. J.: Distinguishing cirrus cloud presence in autonomous lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 435–449, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-435-2015, 2015. 
Cesana, G. and Waliser, D. E.: Characterizing and understanding systematic biases in the vertical structure of clouds in CMIP5/CFMIP2 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10538–10546, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070515, 2016. 
Chand, D., Wood, R., Anderson, T. L., Satheesh S. K., and Charlson, R. J.: Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud cover, Nat. Geosci., 2, 181–184, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO437, 2009. 
Download
Short summary
We describe the enhancements made to the cloud–aerosol discrimination (CAD) algorithms used to produce the CALIPSO version 4 (V4) data products. Revisions to the CAD probability distribution functions have greatly improved the recognition of aerosol layers lofted into the upper troposphere, and CAD is now applied to all layers detected in the stratosphere and all layers detected at single-shot resolution. Detailed comparisons show significant improvements relative to previous versions.
Share