Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-673-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-673-2025
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2025

Forward model emulator for atmospheric radiative transfer using Gaussian processes and cross validation

Otto Lamminpää, Jouni Susiluoto, Jonathan Hobbs, James McDuffie, Amy Braverman, and Houman Owhadi

Related authors

Functional analysis of variance (ANOVA) for carbon flux estimates from remote sensing data
Jonathan Hobbs, Matthias Katzfuss, Hai Nguyen, Vineet Yadav, and Junjie Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1133–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Efficient Bayesian inference for large chaotic dynamical systems
Sebastian Springer, Heikki Haario, Jouni Susiluoto, Aleksandr Bibov, Andrew Davis, and Youssef Marzouk
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4319–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4319-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4319-2021, 2021
Short summary
A new Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 cloud flagging method and rapid retrieval of marine boundary layer cloud properties
Mark Richardson, Matthew D. Lebsock, James McDuffie, and Graeme L. Stephens
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4947–4961, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4947-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4947-2020, 2020
Short summary
Efficient multi-scale Gaussian process regression for massive remote sensing data with satGP v0.1.2
Jouni Susiluoto, Alessio Spantini, Heikki Haario, Teemu Härkönen, and Youssef Marzouk
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3439–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3439-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3439-2020, 2020
Short summary
Parameter calibration and stomatal conductance formulation comparison for boreal forests with adaptive population importance sampler in the land surface model JSBACH
Jarmo Mäkelä, Jürgen Knauer, Mika Aurela, Andrew Black, Martin Heimann, Hideki Kobayashi, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Hank Margolis, Tiina Markkanen, Jouni Susiluoto, Tea Thum, Toni Viskari, Sönke Zaehle, and Tuula Aalto
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4075–4098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Developments on a 22 GHz microwave radiometer and reprocessing of 13-year time series for water vapour studies
Alistair Bell, Eric Sauvageat, Gunter Stober, Klemens Hocke, and Axel Murk
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 555–567, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-555-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-555-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimal selection of satellite XCO2 images for urban CO2 emission monitoring
Alexandre Danjou, Grégoire Broquet, Andrew Schuh, François-Marie Bréon, and Thomas Lauvaux
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 533–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-533-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Separating and quantifying facility-level methane emissions with overlapping plumes for spaceborne methane monitoring
Yiguo Pang, Longfei Tian, Denghui Hu, Shuang Gao, and Guohua Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 455–470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-455-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-455-2025, 2025
Short summary
Retrieving the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane from the European Copernicus CO2M satellite mission using artificial neural networks
Maximilian Reuter, Michael Hilker, Stefan Noël, Antonio Di Noia, Michael Weimer, Oliver Schneising, Michael Buchwitz, Heinrich Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, Hartmut Bösch, and Ruediger Lang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 241–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-241-2025, 2025
Short summary
The differences between remote sensing and in situ air pollutant measurements over the Canadian oil sands
Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Ralf Staebler, Cristian Mihele, Kevin Strawbridge, Jonathan Davies, Ihab Abboud, Sum Chi Lee, Alexander Cede, Martin Tiefengraber, and Robert Swap
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6889–6912, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Batlle, P., Darcy, M., Hosseini, B., and Owhadi, H.: Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learning, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.13202, 8 October 2023. a, b
Boesch, H., Brown, L., Castano, R., Christi, M., Connor, B., Crisp, D., Eldering, A., Fisher, B., Frankenberg, C., Gunson, M., Granat, R., McDuffie, J., Miller, C., Natraj, V., O'Brien, D., O'Dell, C., Osterman, G., Oyafuso, F., Payne, V., Polonski, I., Smyth, M., Spurr, R., Thompson, D., and Toon, G.: Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Level 2 Full Physics Retrieval Algorithm Theoretical Basis, Version 2.0, Rev 2, NASA Earth Data, https://doi.org/10.5067/8E4VLCK16O6Q, 2015. a, b, c, d
Braverman, A., Hobbs, J., Teixeira, J., and Gunson, M.: Post hoc Uncertainty Quantification for Remote Sensing Observing Systems, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 9, 1064–1093, https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1304283, 2021. a, b, c, d, e
Bréon, F.-M., David, L., Chatelanaz, P., and Chevallier, F.: On the potential of a neural-network-based approach for estimating XCO2 from OCO-2 measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5219–5234, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5219-2022, 2022. a
Brynjarsdóttir, J., Hobbs, J., Braverman, A., and Mandrake, L.: Optimal Estimation Versus MCMC for CO2 Retrievals, J. Agr. Biol. Envir. St., 23, 297–316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-0319-8, 2018. a, b
Download
Short summary
We develop and demonstrate a fast forward function emulator for remote sensing of greenhouse gases. These forward functions are computationally expensive to evaluate, and as such the key challenge for many satellite missions in their data processing is the time used in these evaluations. Our method is fast and accurate enough, less than 1 % relative error, so that it could be safely used in operational processing.
Share