Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-673-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-673-2025
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2025

Forward model emulator for atmospheric radiative transfer using Gaussian processes and cross validation

Otto Lamminpää, Jouni Susiluoto, Jonathan Hobbs, James McDuffie, Amy Braverman, and Houman Owhadi

Related authors

Development of UI-WRF-Chem (v1.0) for the MAIA satellite mission: case demonstration
Huanxin Zhang, Jun Wang, Nathan Janechek, Cui Ge, Meng Zhou, Lorena Castro García, Tong Sha, Yanyu Wang, Weizhi Deng, Zhixin Xue, Chengzhe Li, Lakhima Chutia, Yi Wang, Sebastian Val, James L. McDuffie, Sina Hasheminassab, Scott E. Gluck, David J. Diner, Peter R. Colarco, and Arlindo M. da Silva
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1360,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1360, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Functional analysis of variance (ANOVA) for carbon flux estimates from remote sensing data
Jonathan Hobbs, Matthias Katzfuss, Hai Nguyen, Vineet Yadav, and Junjie Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1133–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Efficient Bayesian inference for large chaotic dynamical systems
Sebastian Springer, Heikki Haario, Jouni Susiluoto, Aleksandr Bibov, Andrew Davis, and Youssef Marzouk
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4319–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4319-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4319-2021, 2021
Short summary
A new Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 cloud flagging method and rapid retrieval of marine boundary layer cloud properties
Mark Richardson, Matthew D. Lebsock, James McDuffie, and Graeme L. Stephens
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4947–4961, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4947-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4947-2020, 2020
Short summary
Efficient multi-scale Gaussian process regression for massive remote sensing data with satGP v0.1.2
Jouni Susiluoto, Alessio Spantini, Heikki Haario, Teemu Härkönen, and Youssef Marzouk
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3439–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3439-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3439-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Predictions of failed satellite retrieval of air quality using machine learning
Edward Malina, Jure Brence, Jennifer Adams, Jovan Tanevski, Sašo Džeroski, Valentin Kantchev, and Kevin W. Bowman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1689–1715, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1689-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1689-2025, 2025
Short summary
Deep transfer learning method for seasonal TROPOMI XCH4 albedo correction
Alexander C. Bradley, Barbara Dix, Fergus Mackenzie, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Joost A. de Gouw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1675–1687, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1675-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1675-2025, 2025
Short summary
Global retrieval of TROPOMI tropospheric HCHO and NO2 columns with improved consistency based on the updated Peking University OMI NO2 algorithm
Yuhang Zhang, Huan Yu, Isabelle De Smedt, Jintai Lin, Nicolas Theys, Michel Van Roozendael, Gaia Pinardi, Steven Compernolle, Ruijing Ni, Fangxuan Ren, Sijie Wang, Lulu Chen, Jos Van Geffen, Mengyao Liu, Alexander M. Cede, Martin Tiefengraber, Alexis Merlaud, Martina M. Friedrich, Andreas Richter, Ankie Piters, Vinod Kumar, Vinayak Sinha, Thomas Wagner, Yongjoo Choi, Hisahiro Takashima, Yugo Kanaya, Hitoshi Irie, Robert Spurr, Wenfu Sun, and Lorenzo Fabris
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1561–1589, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1561-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1561-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantitative estimate of several sources of uncertainty in drone-based methane emission measurements
Tannaz H. Mohammadloo, Matthew Jones, Bas van de Kerkhof, Kyle Dawson, Brendan J. Smith, Stephen Conley, Abigail Corbett, and Rutger IJzermans
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1301–1324, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1301-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1301-2025, 2025
Short summary
Implementation and application of an improved phase spectrum determination scheme for Fourier transform spectrometry
Frank Hase, Paolo Castracane, Angelika Dehn, Omaira Elena García, David W. T. Griffith, Lukas Heizmann, Nicholas B. Jones, Tomi Karppinen, Rigel Kivi, Martine de Mazière, Justus Notholt, and Mahesh Kumar Sha
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1257–1267, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1257-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1257-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Batlle, P., Darcy, M., Hosseini, B., and Owhadi, H.: Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learning, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.13202, 8 October 2023. a, b
Boesch, H., Brown, L., Castano, R., Christi, M., Connor, B., Crisp, D., Eldering, A., Fisher, B., Frankenberg, C., Gunson, M., Granat, R., McDuffie, J., Miller, C., Natraj, V., O'Brien, D., O'Dell, C., Osterman, G., Oyafuso, F., Payne, V., Polonski, I., Smyth, M., Spurr, R., Thompson, D., and Toon, G.: Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Level 2 Full Physics Retrieval Algorithm Theoretical Basis, Version 2.0, Rev 2, NASA Earth Data, https://doi.org/10.5067/8E4VLCK16O6Q, 2015. a, b, c, d
Braverman, A., Hobbs, J., Teixeira, J., and Gunson, M.: Post hoc Uncertainty Quantification for Remote Sensing Observing Systems, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 9, 1064–1093, https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1304283, 2021. a, b, c, d, e
Bréon, F.-M., David, L., Chatelanaz, P., and Chevallier, F.: On the potential of a neural-network-based approach for estimating XCO2 from OCO-2 measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5219–5234, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5219-2022, 2022. a
Brynjarsdóttir, J., Hobbs, J., Braverman, A., and Mandrake, L.: Optimal Estimation Versus MCMC for CO2 Retrievals, J. Agr. Biol. Envir. St., 23, 297–316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-018-0319-8, 2018. a, b
Download
Short summary
We develop and demonstrate a fast forward function emulator for remote sensing of greenhouse gases. These forward functions are computationally expensive to evaluate, and as such the key challenge for many satellite missions in their data processing is the time used in these evaluations. Our method is fast and accurate enough, less than 1 % relative error, so that it could be safely used in operational processing.
Share