Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1537-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1537-2015
Research article
 | 
24 Mar 2015
Research article |  | 24 Mar 2015

Cloud thermodynamic phase detection with polarimetrically sensitive passive sky radiometers

K. Knobelspiesse, B. van Diedenhoven, A. Marshak, S. Dunagan, B. Holben, and I. Slutsker

Related authors

Enhancing mobile aerosol monitoring with CE376 dual-wavelength depolarization lidar
Maria Fernanda Sanchez Barrero, Ioana Elisabeta Popovici, Philippe Goloub, Stephane Victori, Qiaoyun Hu, Benjamin Torres, Thierry Podvin, Luc Blarel, Gaël Dubois, Fabrice Ducos, Eric Bourrianne, Aliaksandr Lapionak, Lelia Proniewski, Brent Holben, David Matthew Giles, and Anthony LaRosa
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3121–3146, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3121-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3121-2024, 2024
Short summary
Cloud detection from multi-angular polarimetric satellite measurements using a neural network ensemble approach
Zihao Yuan, Guangliang Fu, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Hai Xiang Lin, Jan Willem Erisman, and Otto P. Hasekamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2595–2610, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2595-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Shortwave reflected energy from NISTAR and the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera onboard the DSCOVR spacecraft
Clark Jay Weaver, Jay Herman, Alexander Marshak, Steven R. Lorentz, Yinan Yu, Allan W. Smith, and Adam Szabo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-638,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-638, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Spatially coordinated airborne data and complementary products for aerosol, gas, cloud, and meteorological studies: the NASA ACTIVATE dataset
Armin Sorooshian, Mikhail D. Alexandrov, Adam D. Bell, Ryan Bennett, Grace Betito, Sharon P. Burton, Megan E. Buzanowicz, Brian Cairns, Eduard V. Chemyakin, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Brian L. Collister, Anthony L. Cook, Andrea F. Corral, Ewan C. Crosbie, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Sanja Dmitrovic, Eva-Lou Edwards, Marta A. Fenn, Richard A. Ferrare, David van Gilst, Johnathan W. Hair, David B. Harper, Miguel Ricardo A. Hilario, Chris A. Hostetler, Nathan Jester, Michael Jones, Simon Kirschler, Mary M. Kleb, John M. Kusterer, Sean Leavor, Joseph W. Lee, Hongyu Liu, Kayla McCauley, Richard H. Moore, Joseph Nied, Anthony Notari, John B. Nowak, David Painemal, Kasey E. Phillips, Claire E. Robinson, Amy Jo Scarino, Joseph S. Schlosser, Shane T. Seaman, Chellappan Seethala, Taylor J. Shingler, Michael A. Shook, Kenneth A. Sinclair, William L. Smith Jr., Douglas A. Spangenberg, Snorre A. Stamnes, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Andrzej P. Wasilewski, Hailong Wang, Edward L. Winstead, Kira Zeider, Xubin Zeng, Bo Zhang, Luke D. Ziemba, and Paquita Zuidema
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3419–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023, 2023
Short summary
Earth observations from the Moon's surface: dependence on lunar libration
Nick Gorkavyi, Nickolay Krotkov, and Alexander Marshak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1527–1537, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1527-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1527-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Deriving cloud droplet number concentration from surface-based remote sensors with an emphasis on lidar measurements
Gerald G. Mace
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3679–3695, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3679-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3679-2024, 2024
Short summary
A random forest algorithm for the prediction of cloud liquid water content from combined CloudSat–CALIPSO observations
Richard M. Schulte, Matthew D. Lebsock, John M. Haynes, and Yongxiang Hu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3583–3596, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of ice-over-water multilayer clouds using multispectral satellite data in an artificial neural network
Sunny Sun-Mack, Patrick Minnis, Yan Chen, Gang Hong, and William L. Smith Jr.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3323–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3323-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3323-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new approach to crystal habit retrieval from far-infrared spectral radiance measurements
Gianluca Di Natale, Marco Ridolfi, and Luca Palchetti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3171–3186, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3171-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3171-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multiple-scattering effects on single-wavelength lidar sounding of multi-layered clouds
Valery Shcherbakov, Frédéric Szczap, Guillaume Mioche, and Céline Cornet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3011–3028, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3011-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Auer Jr., A. H. and Veal, D. L.: The dimension of ice crystals in natural clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 919–926, 1970.
Baran, A. J.: A review of the light scattering properties of cirrus, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 1239–1260, 2009.
Barker, H. W. and Marshak, A.: Inferring optical depth of broken clouds above green vegetation using surface solar radiometric measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2989–3006, 2001.
Bi, L., Yang, P., Liu, C., Yi, B., Baum, B. A., van Diedenhoven, B., and Iwabuchi, H.: Assessment of the accuracy of the conventional ray-tracing technique: Implications in remote sensing and radiative transfer involving ice clouds, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 146, 158–174, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022407314001332, 2014.
Campos, E. F., Ware, R., Joe, P., and Hudak, D.: Monitoring water phase dynamics in winter clouds, Atmos. Res., 147, 86–100, 2014.
Download
Short summary
We test if ground-based sun photometers/radiometers like those in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) can use the polarization sensitivity of some instruments for improved cloud optical property retrieval. Our radiative transfer simulations show that the direction of linear polarization indicates cloud thermodynamic phase for optically thin clouds. In practice, data analysis shows a weak response with AERONET instruments, most likely due to noise and orientation/calibration ambiguity.