Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3527-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3527-2022
Research article
 | 
14 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 14 Jun 2022

Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) collection 4: establishing a 17-year-long series of detrended level-1b data

Quintus Kleipool, Nico Rozemeijer, Mirna van Hoek, Jonatan Leloux, Erwin Loots, Antje Ludewig, Emiel van der Plas, Daley Adrichem, Raoul Harel, Simon Spronk, Mark ter Linden, Glen Jaross, David Haffner, Pepijn Veefkind, and Pieternel F. Levelt

Related authors

Improvements in aerosol layer height retrievals from TROPOMI oxygen A-band measurements by surface albedo fitting in optimal estimation
Martin de Graaf, Maarten Sneep, Mark ter Linden, L. Gijsbert Tilstra, David P. Donovan, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, and J. Pepijn Veefkind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2553–2571, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2553-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2553-2025, 2025
Short summary
Deep transfer learning method for seasonal TROPOMI XCH4 albedo correction
Alexander C. Bradley, Barbara Dix, Fergus Mackenzie, J. Pepijn Veefkind, and Joost A. de Gouw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1675–1687, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1675-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1675-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing the Detection Potential of Targeting Satellites for Global Greenhouse Gas Monitoring: Insights from TANGO Simulations
Harikrishnan Charuvil Asokan, Jochen Landgraf, Pepijn Veefkind, Stijn Dellaert, and André Butz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1071,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1071, 2025
Short summary
Harmonized Cloud Datasets for OMI and TROPOMI Using the O2‐O2 477 nm Absorption Band
Huan Yu, Isabelle De Smedt, Nicolas Theys, Maarten Sneep, Pepijn Veefkind, and Michel Van Roozendael
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-478,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-478, 2025
Short summary
SO2 emissions derived from TROPOMI observations over India using a flux-divergence method with variable lifetimes
Yutao Chen, Ronald J. van der A, Jieying Ding, Henk Eskes, Jason E. Williams, Nicolas Theys, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, and Pieternel F. Levelt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1851–1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1851-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1851-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Assimilation of volcanic sulfur dioxide products from IASI and TROPOMI into the chemical transport model MOCAGE: case study of the 2021 La Soufrière Saint Vincent eruption with the March 2022 version of MOCAGE
Mickaël Bacles, Jonathan Améric, and Vincent Guidard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2659–2680, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2659-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2659-2025, 2025
Short summary
In-flight estimation of instrument spectral response functions using sparse representations
Jihanne El Haouari, Jean-Michel Gaucel, Christelle Pittet, Jean-Yves Tourneret, and Herwig Wendt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2573–2590, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2573-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2573-2025, 2025
Short summary
Robustness of atmospheric trace gas retrievals obtained from low-spectral-resolution Fourier transform infrared absorption spectra under variations of interferogram length
Bavo Langerock, Martine De Mazière, Filip Desmet, Pauli Heikkinen, Rigel Kivi, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Corinne Vigouroux, Minqiang Zhou, Gopala Krishna Darbha, and Mohmmed Talib
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2439–2446, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2439-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2439-2025, 2025
Short summary
Retrieval of NO2 profiles from 3 years of Pandora MAX-DOAS measurements in Toronto, Canada
Ramina Alwarda, Kristof Bognar, Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Jonathan Davies, Sum Chi Lee, Debora Griffin, Alexandru Lupu, Udo Frieß, Alexander Cede, Yushan Su, and Kimberly Strong
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2397–2423, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2397-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2397-2025, 2025
Short summary
A channel selection methodology for enhancing volcanic SO2 monitoring using FY-3E/HIRAS-II hyperspectral data
Xinyu Li, Lin Zhu, Hongfu Sun, Jun Li, Ximing Lv, Chengli Qi, and Huanhuan Yan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2333–2352, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2333-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2333-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S., Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0127:SMOAMM>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Cebula, R. P., Park, H., and Heath, D. F.: Characterization of the Nimbus-7 SBUV Radiometer for the Long-Term Monitoring of Stratospheric Ozone, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 5, 215–227, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1988)005<0215:cotnsr>2.0.co;2, 1988. a
CFConventions: NetCDF Climate and Forecast (CF) Metadata Conventions, Tech. Rep. issue 1.6, CF Conventions, http://www.cfconventions.org (last access: 8 June 2022), 2011. a
Danielson, J. J. and Gesch, D. B.: Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010), Report 2011-1073, p. 26, U.S. Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073, 2011. a
Dobber, M., Kleipool, Q., Dirksen, R., Levelt, P., Jaross, G., Taylor, S., Kelly, T., Flynn, L., Leppelmeier, G., and Rozemeijer, N.: Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument level 1b data products, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008665, 2008a. a, b, c, d
Download
Short summary
A new collection-4 dataset for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) mission has been established to supersede the current collection-3 level-1b (L1b) data, produced with a newly developed L01b data processor based on the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) L01b processor. The collection-4 L1b data have a similar output format to the TROPOMI L1b data for easy connection of the data series. Many insights from the TROPOMI algorithms, as well as from OMI collection-3 usage, were included.
Share