Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3323-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3323-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Identification of ice-over-water multilayer clouds using multispectral satellite data in an artificial neural network
Sunny Sun-Mack
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc., Hampton, VA 23666, USA
Patrick Minnis
Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc., Hampton, VA 23666, USA
Yan Chen
Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc., Hampton, VA 23666, USA
Gang Hong
Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc., Hampton, VA 23666, USA
William L. Smith Jr.
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Seethala Chellappan, David Painemal, Mandana Thieman, Christian Pelayo, William L. Smith Jr., and Lynn M. Russell
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-933, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-933, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed observations from the ARM EPCAPE campaign at coastal California, and satellite cloud properties to understand how large-scale weather patterns influence marine low clouds and aerosols. Using ERA5 data and Self-Organizing Maps, we identified nine synoptic regimes linked to cloud cover, depth, and liquid water path. Satellite data show anticyclone position strongly affects cloud properties, while aerosol–cloud covariability depends on turbulence and supersaturation.
Armin Sorooshian, Mikhail D. Alexandrov, Adam D. Bell, Ryan Bennett, Grace Betito, Sharon P. Burton, Megan E. Buzanowicz, Brian Cairns, Eduard V. Chemyakin, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Brian L. Collister, Anthony L. Cook, Andrea F. Corral, Ewan C. Crosbie, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Sanja Dmitrovic, Eva-Lou Edwards, Marta A. Fenn, Richard A. Ferrare, David van Gilst, Johnathan W. Hair, David B. Harper, Miguel Ricardo A. Hilario, Chris A. Hostetler, Nathan Jester, Michael Jones, Simon Kirschler, Mary M. Kleb, John M. Kusterer, Sean Leavor, Joseph W. Lee, Hongyu Liu, Kayla McCauley, Richard H. Moore, Joseph Nied, Anthony Notari, John B. Nowak, David Painemal, Kasey E. Phillips, Claire E. Robinson, Amy Jo Scarino, Joseph S. Schlosser, Shane T. Seaman, Chellappan Seethala, Taylor J. Shingler, Michael A. Shook, Kenneth A. Sinclair, William L. Smith Jr., Douglas A. Spangenberg, Snorre A. Stamnes, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Andrzej P. Wasilewski, Hailong Wang, Edward L. Winstead, Kira Zeider, Xubin Zeng, Bo Zhang, Luke D. Ziemba, and Paquita Zuidema
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3419–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The NASA Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the western ATlantic Experiment (ACTIVATE) produced a unique dataset for research into aerosol–cloud–meteorology interactions. HU-25 Falcon and King Air aircraft conducted systematic and spatially coordinated flights over the northwest Atlantic Ocean. This paper describes the ACTIVATE flight strategy, instrument and complementary dataset products, data access and usage details, and data application notes.
David Painemal, Douglas Spangenberg, William L. Smith Jr., Patrick Minnis, Brian Cairns, Richard H. Moore, Ewan Crosbie, Claire Robinson, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Edward L. Winstead, and Luke Ziemba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6633–6646, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6633-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6633-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud properties derived from satellite sensors are critical for the global monitoring of climate. This study evaluates satellite-based cloud properties over the North Atlantic using airborne data collected during NAAMES. Satellite observations of droplet size and cloud optical depth tend to compare well with NAAMES data. The analysis indicates that the satellite pixel resolution and the specific viewing geometry need to be taken into account in research applications.
Hong Chen, Sebastian Schmidt, Michael D. King, Galina Wind, Anthony Bucholtz, Elizabeth A. Reid, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, William L. Smith, Patrick C. Taylor, Seiji Kato, and Peter Pilewskie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2673–2697, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we accessed the shortwave irradiance derived from MODIS cloud optical properties by using aircraft measurements. We developed a data aggregation technique to parameterize spectral surface albedo by snow fraction in the Arctic. We found that undetected clouds have the most significant impact on the imagery-derived irradiance. This study suggests that passive imagery cloud detection could be improved through a multi-pixel approach that would make it more dependable in the Arctic.
Cited articles
Amell, A., Eriksson, P., and Pfreundschuh, S.: Ice water path retrievals from Meteosat-9 using quantile regression neural networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5701–5717, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5701-2022, 2022.
Austin, R. T., Heymsfield, A. J., and Stephens, G. L.: Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter-wave radar and temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010049, 2009.
Benjamin, S. G., James, E. P., Hu, M., Alexander, C. R., Ludwig, T. T., Brown, J. M., Weygandt, S. S., Turner, D. D., Minnis, P., Smith Jr., W. L., and Heidinger, A. K.: Stratiform cloud hydro-meteor assimilation for HRRR and RAP model short-range weather prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 149, 2581–2598, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0319.1, 2021.
Cerdeña, A., Gonzalez, A., and Perez, J. C.: Remote sensing of water cloud parameters using neural networks, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 52–63, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1943.1, 2007.
Chang, F.-L. and Li, Z.: A new method for detection of cirrus overlapping water clouds and determination of their optical properties, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3993–4009, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3578.1, 2005.
Chang, F.-L., Minnis, P., Ayers, J. K., McGill, M. J., Palikonda, R., Spangenberg, D. A., Smith Jr., W. L., and Yost, C. R.: Evaluation of satellite-based upper troposphere cloud top height retrievals in multilayer cloud conditions during TC4, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013305, 2010.
Chen, T. and Zhang Y. C.: Sensitivity of atmospheric radiative heating rate profiles to variations of cloud layer overlap, J. Climate, 13, 2941–2959, 2000.
Deng, M., Mace, G. G., Wang, Z., and Berry, E.: CloudSat 2C-ICE product update with a new Ze parameterization in lidar-only region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 12198–12208, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023600, 2015.
Desmons, M., Ferlay, N., Riedl, J., and Theuleux, F.: A global multilayer cloud identification with POLDER/Parasol, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 1121–1139, 2017.
Gupta, S. K., Ritchey, N. A., Rose, F. G., Alberta, T. L., Charlock, T. P., and Coleman, L. H.: Regrid humidity and temperature fields (system 12.0), CERES algorithm theoretical basis document release 2.2, NASA, Hampton, VA, NASA RP 1376, online, https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/documents/ATBD/pdf/r2_2/ceres-atbd2.2-s12.0.pdf (last access: 23 May 2024), 1997.
Håkansson, N., Adok, C., Thoss, A., Scheirer, R., and Hörnquist, S.: Neural network cloud top pressure and height for MODIS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3177–3196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3177-2018, 2018.
Haynes, J. M., Noh, Y. J., Miller, S. D., Haynes, K. D., Ebert-Uphoff, I., and Heidinger, A.: Low cloud detection in multilayer scenes using satellite imagery with machine learning methods, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 39, 319–334, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0084.1, 2022.
Héliere, A., Gelsthorpe, R., Le Hors, L., and Toulemont, Y.: ATLID, the Atmospheric Lidar on board the EarthCARE Satellite, in: Proc. SPIE 10564, International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2012, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, 9–12 October 2012, 105642D https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2309095, 2017.
Hu, Y., S. Rodier, S., Xu, K.-M., Sun, W., Huang, J., Lin, B., Zhai, P., and Josset, D.: Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H34, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012384, 2010.
Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Bhartia, P. K., Wind, G., Platnick, S., and Menzel, W. P.: Detection of multi-layer and vertically-extended clouds using A-train sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 233–247, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-233-2010, 2010.
Kato, S., Sun-Mack, S., Miller, W. F., Rose, F. G., Chen, Y., Minnis, P., and Wielicki, B. A.: Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap, and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud vertical profiles, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H28, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012277, 2010.
Kato, S., Rose, F. G., Ham, S.-H., Rutan, D. A., Radkevich, A., Caldwell, T., Sun-Mack, S., Miller, W. F., and Chen, Y.: Radiative heating rates computed with clouds derived from satellite-based passive and active sensors and their effects on generation of available potential energy, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 1720–1740, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028878, 2019.
Kox, S., Bugliaro, L., and Ostler, A.: Retrieval of cirrus cloud optical thickness and top altitude from geostationary remote sensing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3233–3246, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3233-2014, 2014.
Kurzrock, F., Nguyen, H., Sauer, J., Chane Ming, F., Cros, S., Smith Jr., W. L., Minnis, P., Palikonda, R., Jones, T. A., Lallemand, C., Linguet, L., and Lajoie, G.: Evaluation of WRF-DART (ARW v3.9.1.1 and DART Manhattan release) multiphase cloud water path assimilation for short-term solar irradiance forecasting in a tropical environment, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3939-3954, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3939-2019, 2019.
Lin, B., Minnis, P., Wielicki, B. A., Doelling, D. R., Palikonda, R., Young, D. F., and Uttal, T.: Estimation of water cloud properties from satellite microwave and optical measurements in oceanic environments. II: Results, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 3887–3905, 1998.
Liou, K.-N. and Ou, S.: Infrared radiative transfer in finite cloud layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1985–1996, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<1985:IRTIFC>2.0.CO;2, 1979.
Loeb, N. G. and Coakley Jr., J. A.: Influence of marine stratus cloud optical depths from satellite measurements: Does 1D theory apply?, J. Climate, 11, 215–233, 1998.
Loeb, N. G. and Kizer, E.: CERES data products, NASA Langley Research Center, https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/data/ (last access: 28 May 2024), 2024.
Loeb, N. G., Su, W., Doelling, D. R., Wong, T., Minnis, P., Thomas, S., and Miller, W. F.: 5.03 - Earth's top-of-atmosphere radiation budget, in: Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, UK, 67–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10367-7, 2016.
Loeb, N. G., Yang, P., Rose, F. G., Hong, G., Sun-Mack, S., Minnis, P., Kato, S., Ham, S.-H., Smith Jr., W. L., Hiroki, S., and Tang, G.: Impact of ice cloud microphysics on satellite cloud retrievals and broadband flux radiative transfer model calculations, J. Climate, 31, 1851–1864, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0426.1, 2018.
Marchant, B., Platnick, S., Meyer, K., and Wind, G.: Evaluation of the MODIS Collection 6 multilayer cloud detection algorithm through comparisons with CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and CALIPSO CALIOP products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3263–3275, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020, 2020.
Mecikalski, J. R., Feltz, W. F., Murray, J. J., Johnson, D. B., Bedka, K. M., Bedka, S. M., Wimmers, A. J., Pavolonis, M., Berendes, T. A., Haggerty, J., Minnis, P., Bernstein, B., and Williams, E.: Aviation applications for satellite-based observations of cloud properties, convection initiation, in-flight icing, turbulence and volcanic ash, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1589–1607, 2007.
Minnis, P., Ghambeer, A. V., and Doelling, D. R.: Azimuthal anisotropy of long wave and infrared window radiances from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission and Terra satellites, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D08202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004471, 2004.
Minnis, P., Yi, Y., Huang, J., and Ayers, J. K.: Relationships between radiosonde and RUC-2 meteorological conditions and cloud occurrence determined from ARM data, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006005, 2005.
Minnis, P., Huang, J., Lin, B., Yi, Y., Arduini, R. F., Fan, T.-F., Ayers, J. K., and Mace, G. G.: Ice cloud properties in ice-over-water cloud systems using TRMM VIRS and TMI data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D06206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007626, 2007.
Minnis, P., Hong, G., Sun-Mack, S., Smith Jr., W. L., Chen, Y., and Miller, S.: Estimation of nocturnal opaque ice cloud optical depth from MODIS multispectral infrared radiances using a neural network method, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4907–4932, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024456, 2016.
Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Smith Jr., W. L., Hong, G., and Chen, Y.: Advances in neural network detection and retrieval of multilayer clouds for CERES using multispectral satellite data, in: Proc. SPIE Conf. Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXIV, Strasbourg, France, 9–12 September 2019, Proc. SPIE 11152, 12 pp., https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2532931, 2019.
Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Yost, C. R., Chen, Y., Smith Jr., W. L., Chang, F.-L., Heck, P. W., Arduini, R. F., Trepte, Q. Z., Ayers, K., Bedka, K., Bedka, S., Brown, R. R., Heckert, E., Hong, G., Jin, Z., Palikonda, R., Smith, R., Scarino, B., Spangenberg, D. A., Yang, P., Xie, Y., and Yi, Y.: CERES MODIS cloud product retrievals for Edition 4, Part I: Algorithm changes to CERES MODIS, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 58, 2744–2780, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3008866, 2021.
Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Smith, W. L., Jr., Trepte, Q. Z., Chen, Y., Yost, C. R., Hong, G., Chang, F.-L., Smith, R. A., Heck, P. W., and Yang, P.: VIIRS Edition 1 cloud properties for CERES, Part 1: Algorithm and results, Remote Sens.-Basel, 15, 578, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030578, 2023.
Morcrette, J. J. and Christian, J.: The response of the ECMWF model to changes in the cloud overlap assumption, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1707–1732, 2000.
Pauly, R. M., Yorks, J. E., Hlavka, D. L., McGill, M. J., Amiridis, V., Palm, S. P., Rodier, S. D., Vaughan, M. A., Selmer, P. A., Kupchock, A. W., Baars, H., and Gialitaki, A.: Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS) 1064 nm calibration and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6241–6258, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6241-2019, 2019.
Pavolonis, M. J. and Heidinger, A. K.: Daytime cloud overlap detection from AVHRR and VIIRS, J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 762–778, https://doi.org/10.1175/2099.1, 2004.
Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., King, M. D., Wind, G., Amarasinghe, N., Marchant, B., Arnold, G. T., Zhang, Z.,. Hubanks, P. A, Holz, R. E., Yang, P., Ridgway, W. L., and Riedi, J.: The MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products: Collection 6 updates and examples from Terra and Aqua, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 55, 502–525, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522, 2017.
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Takacs, L., Liu, H.-C., Gu, W., Sienkiewicz, M., Koster, R. D., Gelaro, R., Stajner, I., and Nielsen, J. E.: The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System – Documentation of Versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0, Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM–2008–104606, 27, 118 pp., 2008.
Rutan D. A., Kato, S., Doelling, D. R., Rose, F. G., Nguyen, L. T., Caldwell, T. E., and Loeb, N. G.: CERES synoptic product: Methodology and validation of surface radiant flux, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32, 1121–1143, 2015.
Ryu, Y.-H., Hodzic, A., Barre, J., Descombes, G., and Minnis, P.: Quantifying errors in surface ozone predictions associated with clouds over the CONUS: a WRF-Chem modeling study using satellite cloud retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7509–7525, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7509-2018, 2018.
Sassen, K. and Wang, Z.: Classifying clouds around the globe with the CloudSat radar: 1-year of results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L04805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032591, 2008.
Scarino, B. R., Doelling, D. R., Minnis, P., Gopalan, A., Chee, T., Bhatt, R., and Lukashin, C.: A web-based interface for calculating spectral band difference adjustment factors derived from SCIAMACHY data, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 54, 2529–2542, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2502904, 2016.
Schäfer, S. A. K., Hogan, R. J., Klinger, C., Chiu, J. C., and Mayer, B.: Representing 3-D cloud radiation effects in two-stream models: 1. Longwave consideration and effective cloud edge length, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 8567–8582, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024876, 2016.
Smith Jr., W. L., Minnis, P., Fleeger, C., Spangenberg, D., Palikonda, R., and Nguyen, L.: Determining the flight icing threat to aircraft using single-layer cloud parameters derived from operational satellite data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1794–1810, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-057.1, 2012.
Sourdeval, O., Labonnote, C. J., Baran, A. J., Mülmenstädt, J., and Brogniez, G.: A methodology for simultaneous retrieval of ice and liquid water cloud properties. Part 2: Near-global retrievals and evaluation against A-Train products, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 3063–3081, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2889, 2016.
Stanfield, R. E., Dong, X., Xi, B., Del Genio, A. D., Minnis, P., and Jiang, J.: Assessment of NASA GISS CMIP5 and post-CMIP5 simulated clouds and TOA radiation budgets using satellite observations. Part I: Cloud fraction and properties, J. Climate, 27, 4189–4208, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00558.1, 2014.
Stengel, M., Stapelberg, S., Sus, O., Finkensieper, S., Würzler, B., Philipp, D., Hollmann, R., Poulsen, C., Christensen, M., and McGarragh, G.: Cloud_cci Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer post meridiem (AVHRR-PM) dataset version 3: 35-year climatology of global cloud and radiation properties, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 41–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-41-2020, 2020.
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Tanelli, S., Im, E., Durden, S., Rokey, M., Reinke, D., Partain, P., Mace, G. G., Austin, R., L'Ecuyer, T., Haynes, J., Lebsock, M., Suzuki, K., Waliser, D., Wu, D., Kay, J., Gettelman, A., Wang, Z., and Marchand, R.: CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009982, 2008.
Strandgren, J., Bugliaro, L., Sehnke, F., and Schröder, L.: Cirrus cloud retrieval with MSG/SEVIRI using artificial neural networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3547–3573, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3547-2017, 2017.
Straume, A. G., Rennie, M., Isaksen, L., de Kloe, J., Marseille, G.-J., Stoffelen, A., Flament, T., Stieglitz, H., Dabas, A., Huber, D., Reitebuch, O., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Marksteiner, U., Weiler, F., Witschas, B., Meringer, M., Schmidt, K., Nikolaus, I., Geiss, A., Flamant, P., Kanitz, T., Wernham, D., von Bismarck, J., Bley, S., Fehr, T., Floberghagen, R., and Parrinello, T.: ESA's Space-Based Doppler Wind Lidar Mission Aeolus – First Wind and Aerosol Product Assessment Results, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01007, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023701007, 2020.
Stubenrauch, C., Rossow, W. B., Kinne, S., Ackerman, S., Cesana, G., Chepfer, H., Getzewich, B., DiGirolamo, L., Guignard, A., Heidinger, A., Maddux, B., Menzel, P., Minnis, P., Pearl, C., Platnick, S., Poulsen, C., Riedi, J., Sun-Mack, S., Walther, A., Winker, D., Zeng, S., and Zhao, G.: Assessment of global cloud datasets from satellites: Project and database initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1031–1049, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00117, 2013.
Sun-Mack, S.: Multi-layer cloud-detection artificial neural network output data, NASA Langley Research Center [data set], https://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/data/multilayer-data/, last access: 28 May 2024.
Sun-Mack, S., Minnis, P., Smith Jr., W. L., Hong, G., and Chen, Y.: Detection of single and multilayer clouds in an artificial neural network approach, Proc. SPIE Conf. Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XXII, Warsaw, Poland, 11–14 September 2017, Proc. SPIE 10424-7, 12 pp., https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2277397, 2017.
Tan, Z., Liu, C., Ma, S., Wang, X., Shang, J., Wang, J., Ai, W., and Yan, W.: Detecting multilayer clouds from the geostationary Advanced Himawari Imager using machine learning techniques, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 60, 4103112, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3087714, 2022.
Taravat, A., Proud, S., Peronaci, S., Del Frate, F., and Oppelt, N.: Multilayer perceptron neural networks model for meteosat second generation SEVIRI daytime cloud masking, Remote Sens., 7, 1529–1539, 2015.
Trepte, Q. Z., Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Yost, C. R., Chen, Y. Jin, Z., Chang, F.-L., Smith Jr., W. L., Bedka, K. M., and Chee, T. L.: Global cloud detection for CERES Edition 4 using Terra and Aqua MODIS data, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 57, 9410–9449, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926620, 2019.
Vaughan, M. A., Pitts, M. Trepte, C., Winker, D., Getzewich, B., Detweiler, P., Garnier, A., Hunt, W., Lambeth, J., Lee, K.-P., Lucker, P., Murray, T., Rodier, S., Tremas, T., Bazureau, A., and Pelone, J.: Cloud-Aerosol LIDAR Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data management system data products catalog, Release 4.94, NASA Langley Research Center Document PC-SCI-503, Hampton, Va., USA, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220003549/downloads/CALIPSO_DPC_Rev4x94.pdf (last access: 23 May 2024), 2022.
Wang, C., Platnick, S., Meyer, K., Zhang, Z., and Zhou, Y.: A machine-learning-based cloud detection and thermodynamic-phase classification algorithm using passive spectral observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2257–2277, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2257-2020, 2020.
Wang, J., Liu, C., Yao, B., Min, M., Letu, H., Yin, Y., and Yung, Y. L.: A multilayer cloud detection algorithm for the Suomi-NPP Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), Remote Sens. Environ., 227, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.024, 2019.
Weisz, E., Baum, B. A., and Menzel, P. W.: Fusion of satellite-based imager and sounder data to construct supplementary high spatial resolution narrowband IR radiances, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 11, 036022, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.036022, 2017.
White, C. H., Heidinger, A. K., and Ackerman, S. A.: Evaluation of Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) neural network cloud detection against current operational cloud masks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3371–3394, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3371-2021, 2021.
Wind G., Platnick, S., King, M. D., Hubanks, P. A., Pavolonis, M. J., Heidinger, A. K., Yang, P., and Baum, B. A.: Multilayer cloud detection with the MODIS near-infrared water vapor absorption band, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 49, 2315–2333, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2364.1, 2010.
Winker, M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z., Hunt, W, and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP data processing algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2310–2323, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1, 2009.
Yost, C. R., Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Chen, Y., and Smith Jr., W. L.: CERES MODIS cloud product retrievals for Edition 4, Part II: Comparisons to CloudSat and CALIPSO, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 58, 3695–3724, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3015155, 2021.
Yost, C. R., Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Smith Jr., W. L., Trepte, Q. Z., and Chen, Y.: VIIRS Edition 1 cloud properties for CERES. Part 2: Evaluation with CALIPSO, Remote Sens.-Basel, 15, 1349, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051349, 2023.
Zhang, M. H., Lin, W. Y., Klein, S. A., Bacmeister, J. T., Bony, S., Cederwall, R. T., Del Genio, A. D., Hack, J. J., Loeb, N. G., Lohmann, U., Minnis, P., Musat, I., Pincus, R., Stier, P., Suarez, M. J., Webb, M. J., Wu, J. B., Xie, S. C., Yao, M.-S., and Zhang, J. H.: Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005021, 2005.
Short summary
Multilayer clouds (MCs) affect the radiation budget differently than single-layer clouds (SCs) and need to be identified in satellite images. A neural network was trained to identify MCs by matching imagery with lidar/radar data. This method correctly identifies ~87 % SCs and MCs with a net accuracy gain of 7.5 % over snow-free surfaces. It is more accurate than most available methods and constitutes a first step in providing a reasonable 3-D characterization of the cloudy atmosphere.
Multilayer clouds (MCs) affect the radiation budget differently than single-layer clouds (SCs)...