Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1009-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1009-2018
Research article
 | 
20 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 20 Feb 2018

Importance of interpolation and coincidence errors in data fusion

Simone Ceccherini, Bruno Carli, Cecilia Tirelli, Nicola Zoppetti, Samuele Del Bianco, Ugo Cortesi, Jukka Kujanpää, and Rossana Dragani

Related authors

Optimal variables for retrieval products
Simone Ceccherini
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-42,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-42, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
An improved formula for the complete data fusion
Simone Ceccherini, Nicola Zoppetti, and Bruno Carli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7039–7048, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7039-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7039-2022, 2022
Short summary
Synergistic retrieval and complete data fusion methods applied to simulated FORUM and IASI-NG measurements
Marco Ridolfi, Cecilia Tirelli, Simone Ceccherini, Claudio Belotti, Ugo Cortesi, and Luca Palchetti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6723–6737, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6723-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6723-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comment on “Synergetic use of IASI profile and TROPOMI total-column level 2 methane retrieval products” by Schneider et al. (2022)
Simone Ceccherini
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4407–4410, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4407-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Level 2 processor and auxiliary data for ESA Version 8 final full mission analysis of MIPAS measurements on ENVISAT
Piera Raspollini, Enrico Arnone, Flavio Barbara, Massimo Bianchini, Bruno Carli, Simone Ceccherini, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Angelika Dehn, Stefano Della Fera, Bianca Maria Dinelli, Anu Dudhia, Jean-Marie Flaud, Marco Gai, Michael Kiefer, Manuel López-Puertas, David P. Moore, Alessandro Piro, John J. Remedios, Marco Ridolfi, Harjinder Sembhi, Luca Sgheri, and Nicola Zoppetti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1871–1901, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1871-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1871-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Retrieving the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane from the European Copernicus CO2M satellite mission using artificial neural networks
Maximilian Reuter, Michael Hilker, Stefan Noël, Antonio Di Noia, Michael Weimer, Oliver Schneising, Michael Buchwitz, Heinrich Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, Hartmut Bösch, and Ruediger Lang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 241–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-241-2025, 2025
Short summary
The differences between remote sensing and in situ air pollutant measurements over the Canadian oil sands
Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Ralf Staebler, Cristian Mihele, Kevin Strawbridge, Jonathan Davies, Ihab Abboud, Sum Chi Lee, Alexander Cede, Martin Tiefengraber, and Robert Swap
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6889–6912, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6889-2024, 2024
Short summary
NitroNet – a machine learning model for the prediction of tropospheric NO2 profiles from TROPOMI observations
Leon Kuhn, Steffen Beirle, Sergey Osipov, Andrea Pozzer, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6485–6516, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6485-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6485-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved convective cloud differential (CCD) tropospheric ozone from S5P-TROPOMI satellite data using local cloud fields
Swathi Maratt Satheesan, Kai-Uwe Eichmann, John P. Burrows, Mark Weber, Ryan Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, and Debra Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6459–6484, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6459-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6459-2024, 2024
Short summary
Atmospheric propane (C3H8) column retrievals from ground-based FTIR observations in Xianghe, China
Minqiang Zhou, Pucai Wang, Bart Dils, Bavo Langerock, Geoff Toon, Christian Hermans, Weidong Nan, Qun Cheng, and Martine De Mazière
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6385–6396, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6385-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aires, F., Aznay, O., Prigent, C., Paul, M., and Bernardo, F.: Synergistic multi-wavelength remote sensing versus a posteriori combination of retrieved products: Application for the retrieval of atmospheric profiles using MetOp-A, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D18304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017188, 2012. 
Calisesi, Y., Soebijanta, V. T., and Oss, R. V.: Regridding of remote soundings: formulation and application to ozone profile comparison, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006122, 2005. 
Ceccherini, S.: Equivalence of measurement space solution data fusion and complete fusion, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 182, 71–74, 2016. 
Ceccherini, S. and Ridolfi, M.: Technical Note: Variance–covariance matrix and averaging kernels for the Levenberg–Marquardt solution of the retrieval of atmospheric vertical profiles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3131–3139, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3131-2010, 2010. 
Ceccherini, S., Carli, B., Pascale, E., Prosperi, M., Raspollini, P., and Dinelli, B. M.: Comparison of measurements made with two different instruments of the same atmospheric vertical profile, Appl. Optics, 42, 6465–6473, 2003. 
Download
Short summary
Data fusion is an important tool to reduce data volume and to improve data quality. This paper introduces a generalization of the complete data fusion method, which takes into account interpolation and coincidence errors. This upgraded algorithm extends the applicability of the technique to a wider range of cases. In fact, it also makes it possible to fuse vertical profiles of atmospheric parameters when they are represented on different altitude grids and refer to different true profiles.