Articles | Volume 11, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018
Research article
 | 
22 Nov 2018
Research article |  | 22 Nov 2018

CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 daytime algorithm

Brian J. Getzewich, Mark A. Vaughan, William H. Hunt, Melody A. Avery, Kathleen A. Powell, Jason L. Tackett, David M. Winker, Jayanta Kar, Kam-Pui Lee, and Travis D. Toth

Related authors

A Level 3 monthly gridded ice cloud dataset derived from 12 years of CALIOP measurements
David Winker, Xia Cai, Mark Vaughan, Anne Garnier, Brian Magill, Melody Avery, and Brian Getzewich
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2831–2855, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2831-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2831-2024, 2024
Short summary
Total Column Optical Depths Retrieved from CALIPSO Lidar Ocean Surface Backscatter
Robert A. Ryan, Mark A. Vaughan, Sharon D. Rodier, Jason L. Tackett, John A. Reagan, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, and Brian J. Getzewich
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-23,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-23, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
The CALIPSO version 4.5 stratospheric aerosol subtyping algorithm
Jason L. Tackett, Jayanta Kar, Mark A. Vaughan, Brian J. Getzewich, Man-Hae Kim, Jean-Paul Vernier, Ali H. Omar, Brian E. Magill, Michael C. Pitts, and David M. Winker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 745–768, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-745-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-745-2023, 2023
Short summary
CALIOP V4 cloud thermodynamic phase assignment and the impact of near-nadir viewing angles
Melody A. Avery, Robert A. Ryan, Brian J. Getzewich, Mark A. Vaughan, David M. Winker, Yongxiang Hu, Anne Garnier, Jacques Pelon, and Carolus A. Verhappen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4539–4563, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4539-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4539-2020, 2020
Short summary
CALIPSO level 3 stratospheric aerosol profile product: version 1.00 algorithm description and initial assessment
Jayanta Kar, Kam-Pui Lee, Mark A. Vaughan, Jason L. Tackett, Charles R. Trepte, David M. Winker, Patricia L. Lucker, and Brian J. Getzewich
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6173–6191, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6173-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
The algorithm of microphysical-parameter profiles of aerosol and small cloud droplets based on the dual-wavelength lidar data
Huige Di, Xinhong Wang, Ning Chen, Jing Guo, Wenhui Xin, Shichun Li, Yan Guo, Qing Yan, Yufeng Wang, and Dengxin Hua
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4183–4196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4183-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4183-2024, 2024
Short summary
Bayesian cloud-top phase determination for Meteosat Second Generation
Johanna Mayer, Luca Bugliaro, Bernhard Mayer, Dennis Piontek, and Christiane Voigt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4015–4039, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4015-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lidar–radar synergistic method to retrieve ice, supercooled water and mixed-phase cloud properties
Clémantyne Aubry, Julien Delanoë, Silke Groß, Florian Ewald, Frédéric Tridon, Olivier Jourdan, and Guillaume Mioche
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3863–3881, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3863-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3863-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deriving cloud droplet number concentration from surface-based remote sensors with an emphasis on lidar measurements
Gerald G. Mace
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3679–3695, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3679-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3679-2024, 2024
Short summary
A random forest algorithm for the prediction of cloud liquid water content from combined CloudSat–CALIPSO observations
Richard M. Schulte, Matthew D. Lebsock, John M. Haynes, and Yongxiang Hu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3583–3596, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Chand, D., Wood, R., Anderson, T. L., Satheesh, S. K., and Charlson, R. J.: Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud cover, Nat. Geosci., 2, 181–184, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo437, 2009. 
Forbes, R. M. and Ahlgrimm, M.: On the representation of high-latitude boundary layer mixed-phase cloud in the ECMWF global model, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 3425–3445, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00325.1, 2014. 
Gettelman, A. and Wang, T.: Structural diagnostics of the tropopause inversion layer and its evolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 46–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021846, 2015. 
Hoskins, B.: Towards a PV-θ View of the General Circulation, Tellus, 43, 27–35, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1991.t01-3-00005.x, 1991. 
Download
Short summary
We describe the new architecture of the version 4 (V4) CALIOP 532 nm daytime calibration procedures. Critical differences from the versions include moving the night-to-day calibration transfer region into the lower stratosphere coupled to a multi-dimensional data averaging scheme. Comparisons to collocated high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) measurements shows that the V4 532 nm daytime attenuated backscatter coefficients replicate the HSRL data to within 1.0 % ± 3.5 %.