Articles | Volume 18, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5955-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5955-2025
Research article
 | 
31 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 31 Oct 2025

Evaluating Weather and Chemical Transport Models at High Latitudes using MAGIC2021 Airborne Measurements

Félix Langot, Cyril Crevoisier, Thomas Lauvaux, Charbel Abdallah, Jérôme Pernin, Xin Lin, Marielle Saunois, Axel Guedj, Thomas Ponthieu, Julien Moyé, Michel Ramonet, Anke Roiger, Klaus-Dirk Gottschaldt, and Alina Fiehn

Related authors

Strategic design of methane observation networks to improve emission estimates: A case study in Africa
Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frédéric Chevallier, Bo Zheng, Paul I. Palmer, Frank Hase, Morgan Lopez, Elsa M. Ordway, Shushi Peng, Danielle Monteverde, Michel Ramonet, Jason M. St. Clair, Le Bienfaiteur Sagang, and Benjamin Poulter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 11893–11908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11893-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11893-2026, 2026
Short summary
Urban atmospheric CO2 plumes from space – Part 2: Representation of fine-scale structures
Alohotsy Rafalimanana, Thomas Lauvaux, Charbel Abdallah, Mali Chariot, Michel Ramonet, Josselin Doc, Olivier Laurent, Morgan Lopez, Anja Raznjevic, Maarten Krol, Leena Järvi, Andreas Christen, Dana Looschelders, Leslie David, Olivier Sanchez, Laura Bignotti, Benjamin Loubet, Sue Grimmond, and William Morrison
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2581,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2581, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Using high frequency observations of δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 and uncertain regional isotopic signatures to estimate sources of UK methane emissions
Alice E. Ramsden, Anita L. Ganesan, Matthew Rigby, Chris Rennick, Tim Arnold, Emmal Safi, Edward Chung, Dafina Kikaj, Cameron Yeo, Dave Lowry, Pete Levy, Simon O'Doherty, Kieran M. Stanley, Dickon Young, Joe Pitt, Damien Martin, Morgan Lopez, Michel Ramonet, Grant L. Forster, Arnoud Frumau, and Alistair J. Manning
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 11421–11448, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11421-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11421-2026, 2026
Short summary
An aircraft-based Bayesian inversion of Berlin CO2 emissions with explicit background treatment
Lukas Pilz, Christopher Lüken-Winkels, Alina Fiehn, Anke Roiger, and Sanam N. Vardag
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3665,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3665, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Airborne Lidar measurements of wind profiles during the MAGIC-2021 campaign
Nicolas Cézard, Matthieu Valla, Laurent Lombard, Béatrice Augere, Julien Lahyani, William Patiño-Rosas, Didier Goular, Christophe Planchat, Agnès Dolfi-Bouteyre, Anne Durecu, François Gustave, Anasthase Liméry, Mathieu Quatrevalet, Elias Wolkiewiez, and Cyril Crevoisier
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4286,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4286, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary

Cited articles

Aalto, T.: VERIFY Observation-based System for Monitoring and Verification of Greenhouse Gases D4.4, Tech. rep., https://doi.org/10.3030/776810, 2019. a, b
Agustí-Panareda, A., Barré, J., Massart, S., Inness, A., Aben, I., Ades, M., Baier, B. C., Balsamo, G., Borsdorff, T., Bousserez, N., Boussetta, S., Buchwitz, M., Cantarello, L., Crevoisier, C., Engelen, R., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Garrigues, S., Hasekamp, O., Huijnen, V., Jones, L., Kipling, Z., Langerock, B., McNorton, J., Meilhac, N., Noël, S., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Ramonet, M., Razinger, M., Reuter, M., Ribas, R., Suttie, M., Sweeney, C., Tarniewicz, J., and Wu, L.: Technical note: The CAMS greenhouse gas reanalysis from 2003 to 2020, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3829–3859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3829-2023, 2023. a, b
AMAP: Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and Impacts, Summary for Policy makers, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway, ISBN: 978-82-7971-201-5, 2021. a
Bergamaschi, P., Krol, M., Dentener, F., Vermeulen, A., Meinhardt, F., Graul, R., Ramonet, M., Peters, W., and Dlugokencky, E. J.: Inverse modelling of national and European CH4 emissions using the atmospheric zoom model TM5, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2431–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2431-2005, 2005. a
Bergamaschi, P., Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J. F., Krol, M., Villani, M. G., Houweling, S., Dentener, F., Dlugokencky, E. J., Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., Engel, A., and Levin, I.: Inverse Modeling of Global and Regional CH4 Emissions Using SCIAMACHY Satellite Retrievals, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012287, 2009. a, b
Download
Short summary
Our study compares outputs from meteorological and atmospheric composition models to data from the MAGIC2021 campaign that took place in Sweden. Our results highlight performance differences among models, revealing strengths and weaknesses of different modelling techniques. We also found that wetland emission inventories overestimated emissions in regional simulations. This work helps to refine methane emission predictions, essential for understanding climate change.
Share