Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-435-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-435-2015
Research article
 | 
27 Jan 2015
Research article |  | 27 Jan 2015

Distinguishing cirrus cloud presence in autonomous lidar measurements

J. R. Campbell, M. A. Vaughan, M. Oo, R. E. Holz, J. R. Lewis, and E. J. Welton

Related authors

Arctic spring and summertime aerosol optical depth baseline from long-term observations and model reanalyses – Part 1: Climatology and trend
Peng Xian, Jianglong Zhang, Norm T. O'Neill, Travis D. Toth, Blake Sorenson, Peter R. Colarco, Zak Kipling, Edward J. Hyer, James R. Campbell, Jeffrey S. Reid, and Keyvan Ranjbar
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9915–9947, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9915-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9915-2022, 2022
Short summary
Arctic spring and summertime aerosol optical depth baseline from long-term observations and model reanalyses – Part 2: Statistics of extreme AOD events, and implications for the impact of regional biomass burning processes
Peng Xian, Jianglong Zhang, Norm T. O'Neill, Jeffrey S. Reid, Travis D. Toth, Blake Sorenson, Edward J. Hyer, James R. Campbell, and Keyvan Ranjbar
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9949–9967, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9949-2022, 2022
Short summary
A global analysis of diurnal variability in dust and dust mixture using CATS observations
Yan Yu, Olga V. Kalashnikova, Michael J. Garay, Huikyo Lee, Myungje Choi, Gregory S. Okin, John E. Yorks, James R. Campbell, and Jared Marquis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1427–1447, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1427-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1427-2021, 2021
Short summary
Development of an Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) data assimilation scheme for aerosol modeling over bright surfaces – a step toward direct radiance assimilation in the UV spectrum
Jianglong Zhang, Robert J. D. Spurr, Jeffrey S. Reid, Peng Xian, Peter R. Colarco, James R. Campbell, Edward J. Hyer, and Nancy L. Baker
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 27–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021, 2021
Short summary
Determining cloud thermodynamic phase from the polarized Micro Pulse Lidar
Jasper R. Lewis, James R. Campbell, Sebastian A. Stewart, Ivy Tan, Ellsworth J. Welton, and Simone Lolli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6901–6913, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6901-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6901-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Bayesian cloud-top phase determination for Meteosat Second Generation
Johanna Mayer, Luca Bugliaro, Bernhard Mayer, Dennis Piontek, and Christiane Voigt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4015–4039, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4015-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lidar–radar synergistic method to retrieve ice, supercooled water and mixed-phase cloud properties
Clémantyne Aubry, Julien Delanoë, Silke Groß, Florian Ewald, Frédéric Tridon, Olivier Jourdan, and Guillaume Mioche
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3863–3881, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3863-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3863-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deriving cloud droplet number concentration from surface-based remote sensors with an emphasis on lidar measurements
Gerald G. Mace
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3679–3695, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3679-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3679-2024, 2024
Short summary
A random forest algorithm for the prediction of cloud liquid water content from combined CloudSat–CALIPSO observations
Richard M. Schulte, Matthew D. Lebsock, John M. Haynes, and Yongxiang Hu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3583–3596, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of ice-over-water multilayer clouds using multispectral satellite data in an artificial neural network
Sunny Sun-Mack, Patrick Minnis, Yan Chen, Gang Hong, and William L. Smith Jr.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3323–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3323-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3323-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Cadet, B., Goldfarb, L., Faduilhe, D., Baldy, S., Giraud, V., Keckhut, P., and Réchou, A.: A sub-tropical cirrus clouds climatology from Reunion Island (21_S, 55_E) lidar data set, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1130, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016342, 2003.
Campbell, J. R. and Sassen, K.: Polar Regions stratospheric clouds at the South Pole from 5 years of continuous lidar data: macrophysical, optical, and thermodynamic properties, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009680, 2008.
Campbell, J. R. and Shiobara, M.: Glaciation of a mixed-phase boundary layer cloud at a coastal Arctic site as depicted in continuous lidar measurements, Polar Sci., 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2008.04.004, 2008.
Campbell, J. R., Hlavka, D. L., Welton, E. J., Flynn, C. J., Turner, D. D., Spinhirne, J. D., Scott, V. S., and Hwang, I. H.: Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program sites: Instruments and data processing, J. Atmos. Oceanic. Technol., 32, 439–452, 2002.
Chew, B. N., Campbell, J. R., Reid, J. S., Giles, D. M., Welton, E. J., Salinas, S. V., and Liew, S. C.: Tropical cirrus cloud contamination in sun photometer data, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6724–6731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.017, 2011.
Download
Short summary
Digital thresholds based on 2012 CALIOP satellite lidar measurements are investigated for distinguishing cirrus cloud presence, including cloud top temperatures and heights combined with layer depolarization and phase and optical depths. A cloud top temperature of -37 C is found to exhibit the most stable performance, owing to it being the point of homogeneous liquid-water freezing. Depolarization and phase help but are mostly ambiguous at warmer temperatures where mixed-phase clouds propagate.