Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2965-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2965-2020
Research article
 | 
05 Jun 2020
Research article |  | 05 Jun 2020

Comparing lightning observations of the ground-based European lightning location system EUCLID and the space-based Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on the International Space Station (ISS)

Dieter R. Poelman and Wolfgang Schulz

Related authors

Thunderstorm characteristics with lightning jumps and dives in satellite-based nowcasting
Felix Erdmann and Dieter Roel Poelman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-174,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-174, 2024
Short summary
Insights into ground strike point properties in Europe through the EUCLID Lightning Location System
Dieter Roel Poelman, Hannes Kohlmann, and Wolfgang Schulz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-18,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-18, 2024
Short summary
Global ground strike point characteristics in negative downward lightning flashes – Part 1: Observations
Dieter R. Poelman, Wolfgang Schulz, Stephane Pedeboy, Dustin Hill, Marcelo Saba, Hugh Hunt, Lukas Schwalt, Christian Vergeiner, Carlos T. Mata, Carina Schumann, and Tom Warner
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1909–1919, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1909-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1909-2021, 2021
Short summary
Global ground strike point characteristics in negative downward lightning flashes – Part 2: Algorithm validation
Dieter R. Poelman, Wolfgang Schulz, Stephane Pedeboy, Leandro Z. S. Campos, Michihiro Matsui, Dustin Hill, Marcelo Saba, and Hugh Hunt
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1921–1933, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1921-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1921-2021, 2021
Short summary
Analysis of lightning outliers in the EUCLID network
Dieter R. Poelman, Wolfgang Schulz, Rudolf Kaltenboeck, and Laurent Delobbe
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4561–4572, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4561-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4561-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Comparing FY-2F/CTA products to ground-based manual total cloud cover observations in Xinjiang under complex underlying surfaces and different weather conditions
Shuai Li, Hua Zhang, Yonghang Chen, Zhili Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yuan Li, and Yuanyuan Xue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2011–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Model-based evaluation of cloud geometry and droplet size retrievals from two-dimensional polarized measurements of specMACS
Lea Volkmer, Veronika Pörtge, Fabian Jakub, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1703–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved RepVGG ground-based cloud image classification with attention convolution
Chaojun Shi, Leile Han, Ke Zhang, Hongyin Xiang, Xingkuan Li, Zibo Su, and Xian Zheng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 979–997, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-979-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-979-2024, 2024
Short summary
An intercomparison of EarthCARE cloud, aerosol, and precipitation retrieval products
Shannon L. Mason, Howard W. Barker, Jason N. S. Cole, Nicole Docter, David P. Donovan, Robin J. Hogan, Anja Hünerbein, Pavlos Kollias, Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras, Zhipeng Qu, Ulla Wandinger, and Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 875–898, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-875-2024, 2024
Short summary
First results of cloud retrieval from the Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer
Bo-Ram Kim, Gyuyeon Kim, Minjeong Cho, Yong-Sang Choi, and Jhoon Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 453–470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-453-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-453-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Azadifar, M., Rachidi, F., Rubinstein, M., Paolone, M., Diendorfer, G., Pichler, H., Schulz, W., Pavanello, D., and Romero, C.: Evaluation of the performance characteristics of the European Lightning Detection Network EUCLID in the Alps region for upward negative flashes using direct measurements at the instrumented Säntis Tower, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 595–606, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024259, 2016. 
Biagi, C. J., Cummins, K. L., Kehoe, K. E., and Krider, E. P.: National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) performance in southern Arizona, Texas, and Oklahoma in 2003–2004, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D05208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007341, 2007. 
Bitzer, P. M., Burchfield, J. C., and Christian, H. J.: A Bayesian approach to assess the performance of lightning detection systems, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 563–578, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0032.1, 2016. 
Blakeslee, R. J.: Non-Quality Controlled Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on International Space Station (ISS) Science Data P0.2, Dataset available online from the NASA Global Hydrology Resource Center DAAC, Huntsville, Alabama, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/LIS/ISSLIS/DATA107, 2019. 
Blakeslee, R. J. and Koshak, W. J.: LIS on ISS: Expanded Global Coverage and Enhanced Applications, Earth Obs., 28, 4–14, 2016. 
Download
Short summary
The objective of this work is to quantify the similarities and contrasts between the lightning observations from the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on the International Space Station (ISS) and the ground-based European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID) network. This work is timely, given that the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG), which has a lightning imager (LI) on board, is going to be launched in 2 years.