Articles | Volume 14, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5333-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5333-2021
Research article
 | 
04 Aug 2021
Research article |  | 04 Aug 2021

Estimation of PM2.5 concentration in China using linear hybrid machine learning model

Zhihao Song, Bin Chen, Yue Huang, Li Dong, and Tingting Yang

Related authors

Comparison of the optical properties of pure and transported anthropogenic dusts measured by ground-based Lidar
Zhijuan Zhang, Bin Chen, Jianping Huang, Jingjing Liu, Jianrong Bi, Tian Zhou, and Zhongwei Huang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-1000,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-1000, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Detection of anthropogenic dust using CALIPSO lidar measurements
J. P. Huang, J. J. Liu, B. Chen, and S. L. Nasiri
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11653–11665, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11653-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11653-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Multi-angle aerosol optical depth retrieval method based on improved surface reflectance
Lijuan Chen, Ren Wang, Ying Fei, Peng Fang, Yong Zha, and Haishan Chen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4411–4424, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4411-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4411-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of diurnal aerosol products retrieved from combinations of micro-pulse lidar and sun photometer observations over the KAUST observation site
Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Georgiy Stenchikov, Ellsworth J. Welton, Illia Shevchenko, David Fuertes, Marcos Herreras-Giralda, Tatsiana Lapyonok, and Alexander Smirnov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4445–4470, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4445-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4445-2024, 2024
Short summary
First atmospheric aerosol-monitoring results from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) over Asia
Yeseul Cho, Jhoon Kim, Sujung Go, Mijin Kim, Seoyoung Lee, Minseok Kim, Heesung Chong, Won-Jin Lee, Dong-Won Lee, Omar Torres, and Sang Seo Park
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4369–4390, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4369-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4369-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerosol optical depth data fusion with Geostationary Korea Multi-Purpose Satellite (GEO-KOMPSAT-2) instruments GEMS, AMI, and GOCI-II: statistical and deep neural network methods
Minseok Kim, Jhoon Kim, Hyunkwang Lim, Seoyoung Lee, Yeseul Cho, Yun-Gon Lee, Sujung Go, and Kyunghwa Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4317–4335, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4317-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Stratospheric aerosol characteristics from SCIAMACHY limb observations: two-parameter retrieval
Christine Pohl, Felix Wrana, Alexei Rozanov, Terry Deshler, Elizaveta Malinina, Christian von Savigny, Landon A. Rieger, Adam E. Bourassa, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4153–4181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4153-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, M. D., Massey, F., Chastko, K., and Cupini, C.: Spatial modelling of particulate matter air pollution sensor measurements collected by community scientists while cycling, land use regression with spatial cross-validation, and applications of machine learning for data correction, Atmos. Environ., 230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117479, 2020. 
Apte, J. S., Marshall, J. D., Cohen, A. J., and Brauer, M.: Addressing Global Mortality from Ambient PM2.5, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 8057–8066, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01236, 2015. 
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001. 
CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information: SRTM3, available at: https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/srtmdata/, CGIAR [data set], last access: 1 July 2021. 
Download
Short summary
The linear hybrid machine learning model achieves the expected target well. The overall inversion accuracy (R2) of the model is 0.84, and the RMSE is 12.92 µg m−3. R2 was above 0.7 in more than 70 % of the sites, whereas RMSE and mean absolute error were below 20 and 15 µg m−3, respectively. There was severe pollution in winter with an average PM2.5 concentration of 62.10 µg m−3. However, there was only slight pollution in summer with an average PM2.5 concentration of 47.39 µg m−3.