Articles | Volume 5, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2237-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2237-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 Sep 2012
Research article |
| 20 Sep 2012
Evaluating the capabilities and uncertainties of droplet measurements for the fog droplet spectrometer (FM-100)
J. K. Spiegel
ETH Zurich, Institute for Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
P. Zieger
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
N. Bukowiecki
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
E. Hammer
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
E. Weingartner
Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
W. Eugster
ETH Zurich, Institute for Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Related subject area
Subject: Clouds | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
In situ ground-based mobile measurement of lightning events above central Europe
A phase separation inlet for droplets, ice residuals, and interstitial aerosol particles
Simulation and field campaign evaluation of an optical particle counter on a fixed-wing UAV
Cloud microphysical measurements at a mountain observatory: comparison between shadowgraph imaging and phase Doppler interferometry
Use of large-eddy simulations to design an adaptive sampling strategy to assess cumulus cloud heterogeneities by remotely piloted aircraft
Post-flight analysis of detailed size distributions of warm cloud droplets, as determined in situ by cloud and aerosol spectrometers
PHIPS-HALO: the airborne Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering probe – Part 3: Single-particle phase discrimination and particle size distribution based on the angular-scattering function
Applicability of the VisiSize D30 shadowgraph system for cloud microphysical measurements
Characterising optical array particle imaging probes: implications for small-ice-crystal observations
The De-Icing Comparison Experiment (D-ICE): a study of broadband radiometric measurements under icing conditions in the Arctic
The Portable Ice Nucleation Experiment (PINE): a new online instrument for laboratory studies and automated long-term field observations of ice-nucleating particles
Cézeaux-Aulnat-Opme-Puy De Dôme: a multi-site for the long-term survey of the tropospheric composition and climate change
Using a holographic imager on a tethered balloon system for microphysical observations of boundary layer clouds
Evaluation of ARM tethered-balloon system instrumentation for supercooled liquid water and distributed temperature sensing in mixed-phase Arctic clouds
Revisiting particle sizing using greyscale optical array probes: evaluation using laboratory experiments and synthetic data
Cloud fraction determined by thermal infrared and visible all-sky cameras
Development and characterization of a high-efficiency, aircraft-based axial cyclone cloud water collector
Ice particle sampling from aircraft – influence of the probing position on the ice water content
PHIPS-HALO: the airborne particle habit imaging and polar scattering probe – Part 2: Characterization and first results
A tandem approach for collocated measurements of microphysical and radiative cirrus properties
HoloGondel: in situ cloud observations on a cable car in the Swiss Alps using a holographic imager
Development of a cloud particle sensor for radiosonde sounding
Thermodynamic correction of particle concentrations measured by underwing probes on fast-flying aircraft
PHIPS–HALO: the airborne Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering probe – Part 1: Design and operation
Quantitative evaluation of seven optical sensors for cloud microphysical measurements at the Puy-de-Dôme Observatory, France
Schneefernerhaus as a mountain research station for clouds and turbulence
High-resolution measurement of cloud microphysics and turbulence at a mountaintop station
Dual-channel photoacoustic hygrometer for airborne measurements: background, calibration, laboratory and in-flight intercomparison tests
A comparison of ice water content measurement techniques on the FAAM BAe-146 aircraft
Cloud shadow speed sensor
The backscatter cloud probe – a compact low-profile autonomous optical spectrometer
A fiber-coupled laser hygrometer for airborne total water measurement
HOLIMO II: a digital holographic instrument for ground-based in situ observations of microphysical properties of mixed-phase clouds
PHOCUS radiometer
First correlated measurements of the shape and light scattering properties of cloud particles using the new Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering (PHIPS) probe
Effects of ice particles shattering on the 2D-S probe
Water droplet calibration of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and in-flight performance in liquid, ice and mixed-phase clouds during ARCPAC
Development of a Bioaerosol single particle detector (BIO IN) for the Fast Ice Nucleus CHamber FINCH
Jakub Kákona, Jan Mikeš, Iva Ambrožová, Ondřej Ploc, Olena Velychko, Lembit Sihver, and Martin Kákona
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 547–561, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-547-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-547-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Storm activity is sometimes associated with the generation of ionizing radiation. Our motivation for performing this research was to understand its origin. Using measuring cars fitted with new instruments, it was found that the duration of lightning is longer than generally thought. In most cases, lightning occurs only inside the cloud; however, rarely, it is also visible outside the cloud. In such cases, the course of emission over time can be used to assume what it looks like inside the cloud.
Libby Koolik, Michael Roesch, Carmen Dameto de Espana, Christopher Nathan Rapp, Lesly J. Franco Deloya, Chuanyang Shen, A. Gannet Hallar, Ian B. McCubbin, and Daniel J. Cziczo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3213–3222, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3213-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3213-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new inlet for studying the small particles, droplets, and ice crystals that constitute mixed-phase clouds has been constructed and is described here. This new inlet was tested in the laboratory. We present the performance of the new inlet to demonstrate its capability of separating ice, droplets, and small particles.
Joseph Girdwood, Warren Stanley, Chris Stopford, and David Brus
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2061–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2061-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2061-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
UAVs have great potential to be used for airborne measurements of cloud and aerosol properties, which are of particular importance due to the largely uncharacterised nature of such phenomena. However, since UAVs are a new tool in atmospheric physics expensive platform validation and characterisation of UAV-instrument combinations needs to be performed. This paper presents an evaluation of a fixed-wing UAV in combination with an instrument that measures cloud droplet diameter.
Moein Mohammadi, Jakub L. Nowak, Guus Bertens, Jan Moláček, Wojciech Kumala, and Szymon P. Malinowski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 965–985, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To compare two instruments, a VisiSize D30 shadowgraph system and a phase Doppler interferometer (PDI-FPDR), we performed a series of measurements of cloud droplet size and number concentration in orographic clouds. After applying essential modifications and filters to the data, the results from the two instruments showed better agreement in droplet sizing and velocimetry than droplet number concentration or liquid water content. Discrepancies were observed for droplets smaller than 13 µm.
Nicolas Maury, Gregory C. Roberts, Fleur Couvreux, Titouan Verdu, Pierre Narvor, Najda Villefranque, Simon Lacroix, and Gautier Hattenberger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 335–352, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-335-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-335-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The paper aims to use large-eddy simulations of cumulus clouds to design a sampling strategy that allows following cumulus clouds with remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) and documenting the cloud spatial heterogeneities. Different possible explorations by RPA are investigated, and the use of Gaussian process regression permits the reconstruction of liquid water content (LWC) distribution with only one RPA.
Sorin Nicolae Vâjâiac, Andreea Calcan, Robert Oscar David, Denisa-Elena Moacă, Gabriela Iorga, Trude Storelvmo, Viorel Vulturescu, and Valeriu Filip
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6777–6794, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6777-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6777-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Warm clouds (with liquid droplets) play an important role in modulating the amount of incoming solar radiation to Earth’s surface and thus the climate. The most efficient way to study them is by in situ optical measurements. This paper proposes a new methodology for providing more detailed and reliable structural analyses of warm clouds through post-flight processing of collected data. The impact fine aerosol incorporation in water droplets might have on such measurements is also discussed.
Fritz Waitz, Martin Schnaiter, Thomas Leisner, and Emma Järvinen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3049–3070, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3049-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3049-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A major challenge in the observations of mixed-phase clouds remains the phase discrimination and sizing of cloud droplets and ice crystals, especially for particles with diameters smaller than 0.1 mm. Here, we present a new method to derive the phase and size of single cloud particles using their angular-light-scattering information. Comparisons with other in situ instruments in three case studies show good agreement.
Jakub L. Nowak, Moein Mohammadi, and Szymon P. Malinowski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2615–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2615-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2615-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A commercial instrument that characterizes sprays via shadowgraphy imaging was applied to measure the number concentration and size distribution of cloud droplets. Laboratory and field tests were performed to verify the resolution, detection reliability and sizing accuracy. We developed a correction to the data processing method which improves the estimation of cloud microphysical properties. The paper concludes with recommendations concerning the use of the instrument in cloud physics studies.
Sebastian O'Shea, Jonathan Crosier, James Dorsey, Louis Gallagher, Waldemar Schledewitz, Keith Bower, Oliver Schlenczek, Stephan Borrmann, Richard Cotton, Christopher Westbrook, and Zbigniew Ulanowski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1917–1939, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1917-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1917-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The number, shape, and size of ice crystals in clouds are important properties that influence the Earth's radiation budget, cloud evolution, and precipitation formation. This work suggests that one of the most widely used methods for in situ measurements of these properties has significant uncertainties and biases. We suggest methods that dramatically improve these measurements, which can be applied to past and future datasets from these instruments.
Christopher J. Cox, Sara M. Morris, Taneil Uttal, Ross Burgener, Emiel Hall, Mark Kutchenreiter, Allison McComiskey, Charles N. Long, Bryan D. Thomas, and James Wendell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1205–1224, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1205-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1205-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Solar and infrared radiation are measured regularly for research, industry, and climate monitoring. In cold climates, icing of sensors is a poorly constrained source of uncertainty. D-ICE was carried out in Alaska to document the effectiveness of ice-mitigation technology and quantify errors associated with ice. Technology was more effective than anticipated, and while instantaneous errors were large, mean biases were small. Attributes of effective ice mitigation design were identified.
Ottmar Möhler, Michael Adams, Larissa Lacher, Franziska Vogel, Jens Nadolny, Romy Ullrich, Cristian Boffo, Tatjana Pfeuffer, Achim Hobl, Maximilian Weiß, Hemanth S. K. Vepuri, Naruki Hiranuma, and Benjamin J. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1143–1166, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth's climate is influenced by clouds, which are impacted by ice-nucleating particles (INPs), a minor fraction of atmospheric aerosols. INPs induce ice formation in clouds and thus often initiate precipitation formation. The Portable Ice Nucleation Experiment (PINE) is the first fully automated instrument to study cloud ice formation and to obtain long-term records of INPs. This is a timely development, and the capabilities it offers for research and atmospheric monitoring are significant.
Jean-Luc Baray, Laurent Deguillaume, Aurélie Colomb, Karine Sellegri, Evelyn Freney, Clémence Rose, Joël Van Baelen, Jean-Marc Pichon, David Picard, Patrick Fréville, Laëtitia Bouvier, Mickaël Ribeiro, Pierre Amato, Sandra Banson, Angelica Bianco, Agnès Borbon, Lauréline Bourcier, Yannick Bras, Marcello Brigante, Philippe Cacault, Aurélien Chauvigné, Tiffany Charbouillot, Nadine Chaumerliac, Anne-Marie Delort, Marc Delmotte, Régis Dupuy, Antoine Farah, Guy Febvre, Andrea Flossmann, Christophe Gourbeyre, Claude Hervier, Maxime Hervo, Nathalie Huret, Muriel Joly, Victor Kazan, Morgan Lopez, Gilles Mailhot, Angela Marinoni, Olivier Masson, Nadège Montoux, Marius Parazols, Frédéric Peyrin, Yves Pointin, Michel Ramonet, Manon Rocco, Martine Sancelme, Stéphane Sauvage, Martina Schmidt, Emmanuel Tison, Mickaël Vaïtilingom, Paolo Villani, Miao Wang, Camille Yver-Kwok, and Paolo Laj
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3413–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3413-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3413-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
CO-PDD (Cézeaux-Aulnat-Opme-puy de Dôme) is a fully instrumented platform for atmospheric research. The four sites located at different altitudes from 330 to 1465 m around Clermont-Ferrand (France) host in situ and remote sensing instruments to measure atmospheric composition, including long-term trends and variability, to study interconnected processes (microphysical, chemical, biological, chemical, and dynamical) and to provide a reference point for climate models.
Fabiola Ramelli, Alexander Beck, Jan Henneberger, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 925–939, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-925-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-925-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Boundary layer clouds are influenced by many physical and dynamical processes, making accurate forecasting difficult. Here we present a new measurement platform on a tethered balloon to measure cloud microphysical and meteorological profiles. The unique combination of holography and balloon-borne observations allows high-resolution measurements in a well-defined volume. Field measurements in stratus clouds over the Swiss Plateau revealed unique microphysical signatures in the cloud structure.
Darielle Dexheimer, Martin Airey, Erika Roesler, Casey Longbottom, Keri Nicoll, Stefan Kneifel, Fan Mei, R. Giles Harrison, Graeme Marlton, and Paul D. Williams
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6845–6864, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6845-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6845-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A tethered-balloon system deployed supercooled liquid water content sondes and fiber optic distributed temperature sensing to collect in situ atmospheric measurements within mixed-phase Arctic clouds. These data were validated against collocated surface-based and remote sensing datasets. From these measurements and sensor evaluations, tethered-balloon flights are shown to offer an effective method of collecting data to inform numerical models and calibrate remote sensing instrumentation.
Sebastian J. O'Shea, Jonathan Crosier, James Dorsey, Waldemar Schledewitz, Ian Crawford, Stephan Borrmann, Richard Cotton, and Aaron Bansemer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3067–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3067-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3067-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Optical array probe measurements of clouds are widely used to inform and validate numerical weather and climate models. In this paper, we discuss artefacts which may bias data from these instruments. Using laboratory and synthetic datasets, we demonstrate how greyscale analysis can be used to filter data, constraining the sample volume and improving data quality particularly at small sizes where their measurements are considered unreliable.
Christine Aebi, Julian Gröbner, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5549–5563, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5549-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5549-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A newly developed hemispherical thermal infrared cloud camera (IRCCAM) is presented. The IRCCAM allows automatic cloud detection during the day and at night-time. The cloud fraction determined from the IRCCAM is compared with the cloud fraction determined from other instruments over a time period of 2 years. The IRCCAM has an agreement of +/- 2 oktas cloud fraction in 90 % of the data compared to other instruments. There are no significant differences between seasons or different times of day.
Ewan Crosbie, Matthew D. Brown, Michael Shook, Luke Ziemba, Richard H. Moore, Taylor Shingler, Edward Winstead, K. Lee Thornhill, Claire Robinson, Alexander B. MacDonald, Hossein Dadashazar, Armin Sorooshian, Andreas Beyersdorf, Alexis Eugene, Jeffrey Collett Jr., Derek Straub, and Bruce Anderson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5025–5048, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5025-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5025-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A new aircraft-mounted probe for collecting samples of cloud water has been designed, fabricated, and extensively tested. Cloud drop composition provides valuable insight into atmospheric processes, but separating liquid samples from the airstream in a controlled way at flight speeds has proven difficult. The features of the design have been analysed with detailed numerical flow simulations and the new probe has demonstrated improved efficiency and performance through extensive flight testing.
Armin Afchine, Christian Rolf, Anja Costa, Nicole Spelten, Martin Riese, Bernhard Buchholz, Volker Ebert, Romy Heller, Stefan Kaufmann, Andreas Minikin, Christiane Voigt, Martin Zöger, Jessica Smith, Paul Lawson, Alexey Lykov, Sergey Khaykin, and Martina Krämer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4015–4031, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4015-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The ice water content (IWC) of cirrus clouds is an essential parameter that determines their radiative properties and is thus important for climate simulations. Experimental investigations of IWCs measured on board research aircraft reveal that their accuracy is influenced by the sampling position. IWCs detected at the aircraft roof deviate significantly from wing, side or bottom IWCs. The reasons are deflections of the gas streamlines and ice particle trajectories behind the aircraft cockpit.
Martin Schnaiter, Emma Järvinen, Ahmed Abdelmonem, and Thomas Leisner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 341–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-341-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-341-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
PHIPS-HALO is a novel aircraft instrument for cloud research. It combines microscopic imaging of single cloud particles with the measurement of their spacial light scattering properties. The knowledge of how atmospheric ice particles in clouds scatter visible light is important for improving future climate models.
Marcus Klingebiel, André Ehrlich, Fanny Finger, Timo Röschenthaler, Suad Jakirlić, Matthias Voigt, Stefan Müller, Rolf Maser, Manfred Wendisch, Peter Hoor, Peter Spichtinger, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3485–3498, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3485-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3485-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Microphysical and radiation measurements were collected with the unique AIRcraft TOwed Sensor Shuttle (AIRTOSS) – Learjet tandem platform. It is a combination of a Learjet 35A research aircraft and an instrumented aerodynamic bird, which can be detached from and retracted back to the aircraft during flight.
AIRTOSS and Learjet are equipped with radiative, cloud microphysical, trace gas,
and meteorological instruments to study cirrus clouds.
Alexander Beck, Jan Henneberger, Sarah Schöpfer, Jacob Fugal, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 459–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-459-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-459-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In situ observations of cloud properties in complex alpine terrain are commonly conducted at mountain-top research stations and limited to single-point measurements. The HoloGondel platform overcomes this limitation by using a cable car to obtain vertical profiles of the microphysical and meteorological cloud parameters. In this work example measurements of the vertical profiles observed in a liquid cloud and a mixed-phase cloud at the Eggishorn in the Swiss Alps are presented.
Masatomo Fujiwara, Takuji Sugidachi, Toru Arai, Kensaku Shimizu, Mayumi Hayashi, Yasuhisa Noma, Hideaki Kawagita, Kazuo Sagara, Taro Nakagawa, Satoshi Okumura, Yoichi Inai, Takashi Shibata, Suginori Iwasaki, and Atsushi Shimizu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5911–5931, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5911-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5911-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
A meteorological balloon-borne cloud sensor called the cloud particle sensor (CPS) has been developed. The CPS can count the number of particles per second and can obtain the cloud phase information (i.e. liquid, ice, or mixed). Twenty-five test flights have been made between 2012 and 2015 at midlatitude and tropical sites. The results from the four flights are discussed.
Ralf Weigel, Peter Spichtinger, Christoph Mahnke, Marcus Klingebiel, Armin Afchine, Andreas Petzold, Martina Krämer, Anja Costa, Sergej Molleker, Philipp Reutter, Miklós Szakáll, Max Port, Lucas Grulich, Tina Jurkat, Andreas Minikin, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5135–5162, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5135-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5135-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The subject of our study concerns measurements with optical array probes (OAPs) on fast-flying aircraft such as the G550 (HALO or HIAPER). At up to Mach 0.7 the effect of air compression upstream of underwing-mounted instruments and particles' inertia need consideration for determining ambient particle concentrations. Compared to conventional practices the introduced correction procedure eliminates ambiguities and exhibits consistency over flight speeds between 50 and 250 m s−.
Ahmed Abdelmonem, Emma Järvinen, Denis Duft, Edwin Hirst, Steffen Vogt, Thomas Leisner, and Martin Schnaiter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3131–3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3131-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3131-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The properties of ice crystals present in mixed-phase and ice clouds influence the radiation properties, precipitation occurrence and lifetime of these clouds. It is necessary to investigate the optical and microphysical properties of cloud particles particularly in situ, and to get correlation between these properties. To this end we have developed PHIPS-HALO to measure the optical properties and the corresponding microphysical parameters of individual cloud particles simultaneously.
G. Guyot, C. Gourbeyre, G. Febvre, V. Shcherbakov, F. Burnet, J.-C. Dupont, K. Sellegri, and O. Jourdan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4347–4367, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4347-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4347-2015, 2015
S. Risius, H. Xu, F. Di Lorenzo, H. Xi, H. Siebert, R. A. Shaw, and E. Bodenschatz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3209–3218, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3209-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3209-2015, 2015
H. Siebert, R. A. Shaw, J. Ditas, T. Schmeissner, S. P. Malinowski, E. Bodenschatz, and H. Xu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3219–3228, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3219-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3219-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We report results from simultaneous, high-resolution and collocated measurements of cloud microphysical and turbulence properties during several warm cloud events at the Umweltforschungsstation Schneefernerhaus (UFS) on Zugspitze in the German Alps. The data gathered were found to be representative of observations made with similar instrumentation in free clouds.
D. Tátrai, Z. Bozóki, H. Smit, C. Rolf, N. Spelten, M. Krämer, A. Filges, C. Gerbig, G. Gulyás, and G. Szabó
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 33–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-33-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-33-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Airborne hygrometry is very important in climate research, and the interest in knowing not only water vapor concentration but (cirrus) cloud content as well is increasing. The authors provide a photoacoustic spectroscopy-based dual-channel hygrometer system that can be a good solution for such measurements. The instrument was proven to operate properly from ground level up to the lower stratosphere, giving the possibility even for cirrus cloud studies.
S. J. Abel, R. J. Cotton, P. A. Barrett, and A. K. Vance
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3007–3022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3007-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3007-2014, 2014
V. Fung, J. L. Bosch, S. W. Roberts, and J. Kleissl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1693–1700, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1693-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1693-2014, 2014
K. Beswick, D. Baumgardner, M. Gallagher, A. Volz-Thomas, P. Nedelec, K.-Y. Wang, and S. Lance
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1443–1457, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1443-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1443-2014, 2014
S. W. Dorsi, L. E. Kalnajs, D. W. Toohey, and L. M. Avallone
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 215–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-215-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-215-2014, 2014
J. Henneberger, J. P. Fugal, O. Stetzer, and U. Lohmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2975–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2975-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2975-2013, 2013
O. Nyström, D. Murtagh, and V. Belitsky
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1359–1373, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1359-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1359-2012, 2012
A. Abdelmonem, M. Schnaiter, P. Amsler, E. Hesse, J. Meyer, and T. Leisner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2125–2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2125-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2125-2011, 2011
R. P. Lawson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1361–1381, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1361-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1361-2011, 2011
S. Lance, C. A. Brock, D. Rogers, and J. A. Gordon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1683–1706, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1683-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1683-2010, 2010
U. Bundke, B. Reimann, B. Nillius, R. Jaenicke, and H. Bingemer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 263–271, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-263-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-263-2010, 2010
Cited articles
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989.
Allan, J. D., Baumgardner, D., Raga, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Morales-Garc\'{i}a, F., Garc\'{i}a-Garc\'{i}a, F., Montero-Mart\'{i}nez, G., Borrmann, S., Schneider, J., Mertes, S., Walter, S., Gysel, M., Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., and Krämer, M.: Clouds and aerosols in Puerto Rico – a new evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1293–1309, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1293-2008, 2008.
Arends, B. G., Kos, G. P. A., Maser, R., Schell, D., Wobrock, W., Winkler, P., Ogren, J. A., Noone, K. J., Hallberg, A., Svenningsson, I. B., Wiedensohler, A., Hansson, H. C., Berner, A., Solly, I., and Kruisz, C.: Microphysics of clouds at Kleiner Feldberg, J. Atmos. Chem., 19, 59–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00696583, 1994.
Baltensperger, U., Schwikowski, M., Jost, D., Nyeki, S., Gäggeler, H., and Poulidas, O.: Scavenging of atmospheric constituents in mixed phase clouds at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch Part I: Basic concept and aerosol scavenging by clouds, Atmos. Environ., 32, 3975–3983, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00051-X, 1998.
Baumgardner, D.: An analysis and comparison of five water droplet measuring instruments, J. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 891–910, 1983.
Baumgardner, D., Dye, J. E., Gandrud, B. W., and Knollenberg, R. G.: The forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP-300) during the airborne arctic stratospheric expedition, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 8035–8046, 1992.
Baumgardner, D., Gayet, J. F., Gerber, H., Korolev, A., and Twohy, C.: CLOUDS | Measurement Techniques In Situ, in: Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, Academic Press, 489–498, 2003.
Baumgardner, D., Kok, G., and Chen, P.: Multimodal Size Distributions in Fog: Cloud Microphysics or Measurement Artifact?, in: 5th International Conference on Fog, Fog Collection and Dew, held 25–30 July 2010, Münster, Germany, vol. 1, p. 73, 2010.
Baumgardner, D., Brenguier, J., Bucholtz, A., Coe, H., DeMott, P., Garrett, T., Gayet, J., Hermann, M., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krämer, M., Petzold, A., Strapp, W., Pilewskie, P., Taylor, J., Twohy, C., Wendisch, M., Bachalo, W., and Chuang, P.: Airborne instruments to measure atmospheric aerosol particles, clouds and radiation: A cook's tour of mature and emerging technology, Atmos. Res., 102, 10–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.021, 2011.
Beiderwieden, E.: Fogwater fluxes above a subtropical montane cloud forest, Phd thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 2007.
Beiderwieden, E., Wolff, V., Hsia, Y., and Klemm, O.: It goes both ways: measurements of simultaneous evapotranspiration and fog droplet deposition at a montane cloud forest, Hydrol. Process., 4189, 4181–4189, 2008.
Bennartz, R., Fan, J., Rausch, J., Leung, L. R., and Heidinger, A. K.: Pollution from China increases cloud droplet number, suppresses rain over the East China Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L09704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047235, 2011.
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles: the Interference Structure, vol. 29, John Wiley & Sons, 1983.
Brockmann, J. E.: Aerosol Transport in Sampling Lines and Inlets, in: Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, chap. 6, 3rd Edn., edited by: Kulkarni, P., Baron, P., and Willeke, K., John Wiley & Sons, 69–105, 2011.
Bruijnzeel, L. A. S., Eugster, W., and Burkard, R.: Fog as a Hydrologic Input, in: Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, edited by: Anderson, M. G., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 559–582, 2005.
Burkard, R., Eugster, W., Wrzesinsky, T., and Klemm, O.: Vertical divergence of fogwater fluxes above a spruce forest, Atmos. Res., 64, 133–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00086-8, 2002.
Burkard, R. T.: Fogwater Flux Measurements Above Different Vegetation Canopies, Phd thesis, Universität Bern, 2003.
Chuang, P. Y., Saw, E. W., Small, J. D., Shaw, R. A., Sipperley, C. M., Payne, G. A., and Bachalo, W. D.: Airborne Phase Doppler Interferometry for Cloud Microphysical Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 685–703, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802232956, 2008.
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., Cozic, J., Henning, S., Verheggen, B., Gehrig, R., and Baltensperger, U.: Long-term trend analysis of aerosol variables at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007995, 2007.
Connolly, P. J., Flynn, M. J., Ulanowski, Z., Choularton, T. W., Gallagher, M. W., and Bower, K. N.: Calibration of the Cloud Particle Imager Probes Using Calibration Beads and Ice Crystal Analogs: The Depth of Field, J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech., 24, 1860–1879, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2096.1, 2007.
Cozic, J., Verheggen, B., Weingartner, E., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N., Flynn, M., Coe, H., Henning, S., Steinbacher, M., Henne, S., Collaud Coen, M., Petzold, A., and Baltensperger, U.: Chemical composition of free tropospheric aerosol for PM1 and coarse mode at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 407–423, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-407-2008, 2008.
Droplet Measurement Technologies: Fog Monitor Model FM-100 Operator Manual (DOC-0088 Revision H), published by Droplet Measurement Technologies, Inc., Boulder, USA, 2011.
Dunnett, S. and Wen, X.: A numerical study of the sampling efficiency of a tube sampler operating in calm air facing both vertically upwards and downwards, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 1653–1665, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00118-0, 2002.
Durham, M. D. and Lundgren, D. A.: Evaluation of aerosol aspiration efficiency as a function of stokes number, velocity ratio and nozzle angle, J. Aerosol Sci., 11, 179–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(80)90033-6, 1980.
Dye, J. E. and Baumgardner, D.: Evaluation of the forward scattering spectrometer probe, I – Electronic and optical studies, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 1, 329–344, 1984.
Eugster, W. and Plüss, P.: A fault-tolerant eddy covariance system for measuring CH4 fluxes, Agr. Forest. Meteorol., 150, 841–851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.12.008, 2010.
Eugster, W., Burkard, R., Holwerda, F., Scatena, F., and Bruijnzeel, L.: Characteristics of fog and fogwater fluxes in a Puerto Rican elfin cloud forest, Agr. Forest. Meteorol., 139, 288–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.07.008, 2006.
Frumau, K. F. A., Burkard, R., Schmid, S., Bruijnzeel, L. A. S., Tobón, C., and Calvo-Alvarado, J. C.: A comparison of the performance of three types of passive fog gauges under conditions of wind-driven fog and precipitation, Hydrol. Process., 25, 374–383, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7884, 2011.
Fuzzi, S., Orsi, G., and Mariotti, M.: Wet deposition due to fog in the Po Valley, Italy, J. Atmos. Chem., 3, 289–296, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210501, 1985.
Gerber, H.: Direct measurement of suspended particulate volume concentration and far-infrared extinction coefficient with a laser-diffraction instrument, Appl. Optics, 30, 4824–4831, 1991.
Gonser, S. G., Klemm, O., Griessbaum, F., Chang, S.-C., Chu, H.-S., and Hsia, Y.-J.: The Relation Between Humidity and Liquid Water Content in Fog: An Experimental Approach, Pure Appl. Geophys., 169, 821–833, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0270-x, 2011.
Grinshpun, S., Willeke, K., and Kalatoor, S.: A general equation for aerosol aspiration by thin-walled sampling probes in calm and moving air, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 27, 1459–1470, 1993.
Grinshpun, S., Chang, C., Nevalainen, A., and Willeke, K.: Inlet characteristics of bioaerosol samplers, J. Aerosol Sci., 25, 1503–1522, 1994.
Gunn, R. and Philips, B. B.: A experimental investigation of the effect of air pollution on the initiation of rain, J. Meteorol., 14, 272–280, 1957.
Hangal, S. and Willeke, K.: Aspiration efficiency: unified model for all forward sampling angles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 688–691, https://doi.org/10.1021/es00075a012, 1990a.
Hangal, S. and Willeke, K.: Overall efficiency of tubular inlets sampling at 0-90 \degree from horizontal aerosol flows, Atmos. Environ. A-Gen., 24, 2379–2386, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90330-P, 1990b.
Henning, S., Weingartner, E., Schmidt, S., Wendisch, M., Gaggeler, H. W., and Baltensperger, U.: Size-dependent aerosol activation at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch (3580 m asl), Tellus B, 54, 82–95, 2002.
Holwerda, F., Burkard, R., Eugster, W., Scatena, F. N., Meesters, A. G. C., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Estimating fog deposition at a Puerto Rican elfin cloud forest site: comparison of the water budget and eddy covariance methods, Hydrol. Process., 20, 2669–2692, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6065, 2006.
Jaenicke, R. and Hanusch, T.: Simulation of the optical-particle counter forward scattering spectrometer probe-100 (fssp-100) – consequences for size distribution measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 18, 309–322, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829308959607, 1993.
Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Klimach, T., Drewnick, F., Keller, L., Cziczo, D. J., Mertes, S., Borrmann, S., and Curtius, J.: Chemical composition of ambient aerosol, ice residues and cloud droplet residues in mixed-phase clouds: single particle analysis during the Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE 6), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8077–8095, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010, 2010.
Ketterer, C. : Investigation of the planetary boundary layer using remote sensing and in-situ measurements at the Kleine Scheidegg and at the Jungfraujoch, Masterthesis, available at http://www.climatestudies.unibe.ch/students/personalpage_en.html?id=75, University of Berne, Faculty of Sciences, Berne, 2011.
Knollenberg, R. G.: Techniques for Probing Cloud Microstructure, in: Clouds, Their Formation, Optical Properties and Effects, edited by: Hobbs, P. V. and Deepak, A., Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 15–92, 1981.
Kokhanovsky, A. and Rozanov, V. V.: Droplet vertical sizing in warm clouds using passive optical measurements from a satellite, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 517–528, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-517-2012, 2012.
Kowalski, A.: Near-surface fluxes of cloud water evolve vertically, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 2663–2684, 1999.
Kowalski, A., Anthoni, P., Vong, R., Delany, A., and Maclean, G.: Deployment and evaluation of a system for ground-based measurement of cloud liquid water turbulent fluxes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 14, 468–479, 1997.
Lance, S., Brock, C. A., Rogers, D., and Gordon, J. A.: Water droplet calibration of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and in-flight performance in liquid, ice and mixed-phase clouds during ARCPAC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1683–1706, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1683-2010, 2010.
Liou, K.: An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, 2nd Edn., vol. 84 of International Geophysics Series, Academic Press, 2002.
Liu, B. and Agarwal, J.: Experimental observation of aerosol deposition in turbulent flow, J. Aerosol Sci., 5, 145–155, 1974.
Liu, D., Yang, J., Niu, S., and Li, Z.: On the Evolution and Structure of a Radiation Fog Event in Nanjing, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28, 223–237, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-0017-0, 2011.
Mätzler, C.: MATLAB Functions for Mie Scattering and Absorption Version 2, Tech. rep., University of Bern, Bern, 2002.
McFarquhar, G. M., Um, J., Freer, M., Baumgardner, D., Kok, G. L., and Mace, G.: Importance of small ice crystals to cirrus properties: Observations from the Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE), Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L13803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029865, 2007.
Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Walter, S., Connolly, P., Ebert, M., Schneider, J., Bower, K. N., Cozic, J., Weinbruch, S., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Counterflow virtual impactor based collection of small ice particles in mixed-phase clouds for the physico-chemical characterization of tropospheric ice nuclei: sampler description and first case study, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 848–864, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701501881, 2007.
Mie, G.: Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen, Ann. Phys.-Berlin, 330, 377–445, 1908.
Miles, N. L., Verlinde, J., and Clothiaux, E. E.: Cloud Droplet Size Distributions in Low-Level Stratiform Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 295–311, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0295:CDSDIL>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Muyshondt, A., McFarland, A. R., and Anand, N. K.: Deposition of aerosol particles in contraction fittings, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 24, 205–216, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965364, 1996.
Niu, S., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Zhao, L., Lü, J., and Yang, J.: Analysis of the microphysical structure of heavy fog using a droplet spectrometer: a case study, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1259–1275, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-8192-6, 2010.
Pinnick, R. and Auvermann, H.: Response characteristics of Knollenberg light-scattering aerosol counters, J. Aerosol Sci., 10, 55–74, 1979.
Pinnick, R., Garvey, D., and Duncan, L.: Calibration of Knollenberg FSSP light-scattering counters for measurement of cloud droplets, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1049–1057, 1981.
Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997.
Rosenberg, P. D., Dean, A. R., Williams, P. I., Dorsey, J. R., Minikin, A., Pickering, M. A., and Petzold, A.: Particle sizing calibration with refractive index correction for light scattering optical particle counters and impacts upon PCASP and CDP data collected during the Fennec campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1147–1163, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1147-2012, 2012.
Rosenfeld, D. and Lensky, I. M.: Satellite based insights into precipitation formation processes in continental and maritime convective clouds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 2457–2476, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<2457:SBIIPF>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Schmid, S., Burkard, R., Frumau, K., Tobon, C., Bruijnzeel, L., Siegwolf, R., and Eugster, W.: Using eddy covariance and stable isotope mass balance techniques to estimate fog water contributions to a Costa Rican cloud forest during the dry season, Hydrol. Process., 25, 429–437, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7739, 2010.
Schwendiman, L., Stegen, G., and Glissmeyer, J.: Methods and aids for assessing particle losses in sampling lines, Tech. rep., Report BNWL- SA-5138, 1975.
Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system., Nature, 461, 607–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281, 2009.
Su, W.-C. and Vincent, J. H.: Towards a general semi-empirical model for the aspiration efficiencies of aerosol samplers in perfectly calm air, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 1119–1134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.04.003, 2004.
Su, W.-C. and Vincent, J. H.: Corrigendum to "Towards a general semi-empirical model for the aspiration efficiencies of aerosol samplers in perfectly calm air", J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 1468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.07.003, 2005.
Targino, A. C., Coe, H., Cozic, J., Crosier, J., Crawford, I., Bower, K., Flynn, M., Gallagher, M., Allan, J., Verheggen, B., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Choularton, T.: Influence of particle chemical composition on the phase of cold clouds at a high-alpine site in Switzerland, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D18206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011365, 2009.
Thalmann, E.: Ion fluxes from fog and rain to an agricultural and a forest ecosystem in Europe, Atmos. Res., 64, 147–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00087-X, 2002.
Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, 1977.
Verheggen, B., Cozic, J., Weingartner, E., Bower, K., Mertes, S., Connolly, P., Gallagher, M., Flynn, M., Choularton, T., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol partitioning between the interstitial and the condensed phase in mixed-phase clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D23202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008714, 2007.
von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009, 2009.
Vong, R.: Eddy correlation measurements of size-dependent cloud droplet turbulent fluxes to complex terrain, Tellus B, 47, 331–352, 1995.
Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Seasonal and diurnal variation of aerosol size distributions (10 < D < 750 nm) at a high-alpine site (Jungfraujoch 3580 m asl), J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26809–26820, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900170, 1999.
Westbeld, A., Klemm, O., Grie{ß}baum, F., Sträter, E., Larrain, H., Osses, P., and Cereceda, P.: Fog deposition to a Tillandsia carpet in the Atacama Desert, Ann. Geophys., 27, 3571–3576, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3571-2009, 2009.
Wrzesinsky, T.: Summertime fog chemistry at a mountainous site in central Europe, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1487–1496, 2000.
Zieger, P., Kienast-Sjögren, E., Starace, M., von Bismarck, J., Bukowiecki, N., Baltensperger, U., Wienhold, F. G., Peter, T., Ruhtz, T., Collaud Coen, M., Vuilleumier, L., Maier, O., Emili, E., Popp, C., and Weingartner, E.: Spatial variation of aerosol optical properties around the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7231–7249, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7231-2012, 2012.
