Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 861–879, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-861-2018
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 861–879, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-861-2018

Research article 14 Feb 2018

Research article | 14 Feb 2018

Three-channel single-wavelength lidar depolarization calibration

Emily M. McCullough et al.

Related authors

Finely laminated Arctic mixed-phase clouds occur frequently and are correlated with snow
Emily M. McCullough, Robin Wing, and James R. Drummond
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-186,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-186, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Lidar measurements of thin laminations within Arctic clouds
Emily M. McCullough, James R. Drummond, and Thomas J. Duck
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4595–4614, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4595-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4595-2019, 2019
Short summary
Lidar temperature series in the middle atmosphere as a reference data set – Part 2: Assessment of temperature observations from MLS/Aura and SABER/TIMED satellites
Robin Wing, Alain Hauchecorne, Philippe Keckhut, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Sergey Khaykin, and Emily M. McCullough
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6703–6717, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6703-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6703-2018, 2018
Short summary
Lidar temperature series in the middle atmosphere as a reference data set – Part 1: Improved retrievals and a 20-year cross-validation of two co-located French lidars
Robin Wing, Alain Hauchecorne, Philippe Keckhut, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Sergey Khaykin, Emily M. McCullough, Jean-François Mariscal, and Éric d'Almeida
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5531–5547, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5531-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5531-2018, 2018
Short summary
Depolarization calibration and measurements using the CANDAC Rayleigh–Mie–Raman lidar at Eureka, Canada
Emily M. McCullough, Robert J. Sica, James R. Drummond, Graeme Nott, Christopher Perro, Colin P. Thackray, Jason Hopper, Jonathan Doyle, Thomas J. Duck, and Kaley A. Walker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4253–4277, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4253-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4253-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Triple-frequency radar retrieval of microphysical properties of snow
Kamil Mroz, Alessandro Battaglia, Cuong Nguyen, Andrew Heymsfield, Alain Protat, and Mengistu Wolde
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7243–7254, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7243-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7243-2021, 2021
Short summary
Retrieving microphysical properties of concurrent pristine ice and snow using polarimetric radar observations
Nicholas J. Kedzuf, J. Christine Chiu, V. Chandrasekar, Sounak Biswas, Shashank S. Joshil, Yinghui Lu, Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Christopher Westbrook, Yann Blanchard, and Sebastian O'Shea
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6885–6904, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6885-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6885-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparison of mid-latitude single- and mixed-phase cloud optical depth from co-located infrared spectrometer and backscatter lidar measurements
Gianluca Di Natale, Marco Barucci, Claudio Belotti, Giovanni Bianchini, Francesco D'Amato, Samuele Del Bianco, Marco Gai, Alessio Montori, Ralf Sussmann, Silvia Viciani, Hannes Vogelmann, and Luca Palchetti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6749–6758, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6749-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6749-2021, 2021
Short summary
Physical characteristics of frozen hydrometeors inferred with parameter estimation
Alan J. Geer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5369–5395, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5369-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5369-2021, 2021
Short summary
Cloud height measurement by a network of all-sky imagers
Niklas Benedikt Blum, Bijan Nouri, Stefan Wilbert, Thomas Schmidt, Ontje Lünsdorf, Jonas Stührenberg, Detlev Heinemann, Andreas Kazantzidis, and Robert Pitz-Paal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5199–5224, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5199-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5199-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Cesana, G., Chepfer, H., Winker, D., Getzewich, B., Cai, X., Jourdan, O., Mioche, G., Okamoto, H., Hagihara, Y., Noel, V., and Reverdy, M.: Using in situ airborne measurements to evaluate three cloud phase products derived from CALIPSO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 5788–5808, 2016.
Freudenthaler, V.: About the effects of polarising optics on lidar signals and the Δ90 calibration, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4181–4255, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4181-2016, 2016.
Gimmestad, G. G.: Reexamination of depolarization in lidar measurements, Appl. Optics, 47, 3795–3802, 2008.
Hogan, R. J., Francis, P. N., Flentje, H., Illingworth, A. J., Quante, M., and Pelon, J.: Characteristics of mixed-phase clouds. I: Lidar, radar and aircraft observations from CLARE'98, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 2089–2116, https://doi.org/10.1256/rj.01.208, 2003.
Korolev, A. V., Isaac, G. A., Strapp, J. W., Cober, S. G., and Barker, H. W.: In situ measurements of liquid water content profiles in midlatitude stratiform clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1693–1699, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.147, 2007.
Download
Short summary
Measuring the phase (liquid and ice) of Arctic clouds is essential for understanding the changing global climate. Using a lidar, two polarized signals are usually needed. At CRL lidar, one of these signals is small, so phase measurements have low resolution. Another method can use a large unpolarized signal in place of the small polarized signal. We show how to use the original low-resolution measurement to calibrate the new high-resolution method. At CRL, this gives 20 times higher resolution.