Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3049–3070, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3049-2021
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3049–3070, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3049-2021
Research article
27 Apr 2021
Research article | 27 Apr 2021

PHIPS-HALO: the airborne Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering probe – Part 3: Single-particle phase discrimination and particle size distribution based on the angular-scattering function

Fritz Waitz et al.

Related authors

In situ observation of riming in mixed-phase clouds using the PHIPS probe
Fritz Waitz, Martin Schnaiter, Thomas Leisner, and Emma Järvinen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7087–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7087-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7087-2022, 2022
Short summary
Specifying the light-absorbing properties of aerosol particles in fresh snow samples, collected at the Environmental Research Station Schneefernerhaus (UFS), Zugspitze
Martin Schnaiter, Claudia Linke, Inas Ibrahim, Alexei Kiselev, Fritz Waitz, Thomas Leisner, Stefan Norra, and Till Rehm
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10829–10844, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10829-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10829-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
A phase separation inlet for droplets, ice residuals, and interstitial aerosol particles
Libby Koolik, Michael Roesch, Carmen Dameto de Espana, Christopher Nathan Rapp, Lesly J. Franco Deloya, Chuanyang Shen, A. Gannet Hallar, Ian B. McCubbin, and Daniel J. Cziczo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3213–3222, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3213-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3213-2022, 2022
Short summary
Simulation and field campaign evaluation of an optical particle counter on a fixed-wing UAV
Joseph Girdwood, Warren Stanley, Chris Stopford, and David Brus
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2061–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2061-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2061-2022, 2022
Short summary
Cloud microphysical measurements at a mountain observatory: comparison between shadowgraph imaging and phase Doppler interferometry
Moein Mohammadi, Jakub L. Nowak, Guus Bertens, Jan Moláček, Wojciech Kumala, and Szymon P. Malinowski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 965–985, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022, 2022
Short summary
Use of large-eddy simulations to design an adaptive sampling strategy to assess cumulus cloud heterogeneities by remotely piloted aircraft
Nicolas Maury, Gregory C. Roberts, Fleur Couvreux, Titouan Verdu, Pierre Narvor, Najda Villefranque, Simon Lacroix, and Gautier Hattenberger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 335–352, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-335-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-335-2022, 2022
Short summary
Post-flight analysis of detailed size distributions of warm cloud droplets, as determined in situ by cloud and aerosol spectrometers
Sorin Nicolae Vâjâiac, Andreea Calcan, Robert Oscar David, Denisa-Elena Moacă, Gabriela Iorga, Trude Storelvmo, Viorel Vulturescu, and Valeriu Filip
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6777–6794, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6777-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6777-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdelmonem, A., Järvinen, E., Duft, D., Hirst, E., Vogt, S., Leisner, T., and Schnaiter, M.: PHIPS–HALO: the airborne Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering probe – Part 1: Design and operation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 3131–3144, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3131-2016, 2016. a, b
Baum, B. A., Yang, P., Heymsfield, A. J., Schmitt, C. G., Xie, Y., Bansemer, A., Hu, Y.-X., and Zhang, Z.: Improvements in Shortwave Bulk Scattering and Absorption Models for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 50, 1037–1056, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2608.1, 2011. a, b, c
Bohren, C. F. and Huffmann, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, chap. Appendix A: Homogeneous Sphere, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 477–482, https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527618156.app2, 2007. a
Cober, S. G., Isaac, G. A., Korolev, A. V., and Strapp, J. W.: Assessing Cloud-Phase Conditions, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1967–1983, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1967:ACPC>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
UCAR/NCAR-EOL: NCAR HCR radar and HSRL lidar moments data, Version 1.0. UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.5065/D64J0CZS, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
A major challenge in the observations of mixed-phase clouds remains the phase discrimination and sizing of cloud droplets and ice crystals, especially for particles with diameters smaller than 0.1 mm. Here, we present a new method to derive the phase and size of single cloud particles using their angular-light-scattering information. Comparisons with other in situ instruments in three case studies show good agreement.