Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5167-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5167-2023
Research article
 | 
03 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 03 Nov 2023

Validation of the WRF-ARW eclipse model with measurements from the 2019 and 2020 total solar eclipses

Carl E. Spangrude, Jennifer W. Fowler, W. Graham Moss, and June Wang

Related authors

Evaluation of the New York State Mesonet Profiler Network data
Bhupal Shrestha, Jerald A. Brotzge, and Junhong Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6011–6033, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6011-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6011-2022, 2022
Short summary
Managing the transition from Vaisala RS92 to RS41 radiosondes within the Global Climate Observing System Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN): a progress report
Ruud J. Dirksen, Greg E. Bodeker, Peter W. Thorne, Andrea Merlone, Tony Reale, Junhong Wang, Dale F. Hurst, Belay B. Demoz, Tom D. Gardiner, Bruce Ingleby, Michael Sommer, Christoph von Rohden, and Thierry Leblanc
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 9, 337–355, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-337-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-337-2020, 2020
Short summary
Precipitable water characteristics during the 2013 Colorado flood using ground-based GPS measurements
Hannah K. Huelsing, Junhong Wang, Carl Mears, and John J. Braun
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4055–4066, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4055-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4055-2017, 2017
Short summary
A review of sources of systematic errors and uncertainties in observations and simulations at 183 GHz
Hélène Brogniez, Stephen English, Jean-François Mahfouf, Andreas Behrendt, Wesley Berg, Sid Boukabara, Stefan Alexander Buehler, Philippe Chambon, Antonia Gambacorta, Alan Geer, William Ingram, E. Robert Kursinski, Marco Matricardi, Tatyana A. Odintsova, Vivienne H. Payne, Peter W. Thorne, Mikhail Yu. Tretyakov, and Junhong Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2207–2221, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2207-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2207-2016, 2016
Short summary
The uncertainty of the atmospheric integrated water vapour estimated from GNSS observations
T. Ning, J. Wang, G. Elgered, G. Dick, J. Wickert, M. Bradke, M. Sommer, R. Querel, and D. Smale
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 79–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-79-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-79-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Time-resolved measurements of the densities of individual frozen hydrometeors and fresh snowfall
Dhiraj K. Singh, Eric R. Pardyjak, and Timothy J. Garrett
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4581–4598, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024, 2024
Short summary
Uncertainties in temperature statistics and fluxes determined by sonic anemometers due to wind-induced vibrations of mounting arms
Zhongming Gao, Heping Liu, Dan Li, Bai Yang, Von Walden, Lei Li, and Ivan Bogoev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4109–4120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4109-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4109-2024, 2024
Short summary
Performance evaluation of MeteoTracker mobile sensor for outdoor applications
Francesco Barbano, Erika Brattich, Carlo Cintolesi, Abdul Ghafoor Nizamani, Silvana Di Sabatino, Massimo Milelli, Esther E. M. Peerlings, Sjoerd Polder, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Antonio Parodi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3255–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of anemometer changes, site relocations and processing methods on wind speed trends in China
Yi Liu, Lihong Zhou, Yingzuo Qin, Cesar Azorin-Molina, Cheng Shen, Rongrong Xu, and Zhenzhong Zeng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1123–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1123-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of Aeolus L2B products over the tropical Atlantic using radiosondes
Maurus Borne, Peter Knippertz, Martin Weissmann, Benjamin Witschas, Cyrille Flamant, Rosimar Rios-Berrios, and Peter Veals
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 561–581, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-561-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-561-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Amiridis, V., Melas, D., Balis, D. S., Papayannis, A., Founda, D., Katragkou, E., Giannakaki, E., Mamouri, R. E., Gerasopoulos, E., and Zerefos, C.: Aerosol Lidar observations and model calculations of the Planetary Boundary Layer evolution over Greece, during the March 2006 Total Solar Eclipse, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6181–6189, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6181-2007, 2007. 
Anderson, R. C., Keefer, D. R., and Myers, O. E.: Atmospheric Pressure and Temperature Changes During the 7 March 1970 Solar Eclipse, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 583–587, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<0583:APATCD>2.0.CO;2, 1972. 
Anfossi, D., Schayes, G., Degrazia, G., and Goulart, A.: Atmospheric Turbulence Decay During the Solar Total Eclipse of 11 August 1999, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 111, 301–311, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000016491.28111.43, 2004. 
Aplin, K. L., and Harrison, R.: Meteorological effects of the eclipse 0f 11 August 1999 in cloudy and clear conditions, P. Roy. Soc. London, 459A, 353–371, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.1042, 2003. 
Colligan T., Fowler J., Godfrey J., and Spangrude C.: Detection of stratospheric gravity waves induced by the total solar eclipse of July 2, 2019, Sci. Rep.-UK, 10, 19428, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75098-2, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric measurements were completed for two total solar eclipses. An eclipse-specific weather model was utilized to model the atmosphere before, during, and after the eclipse events. These measurements have enabled further validation of the model's performance in simulating atmospheric responses to total solar eclipses. The paper concludes by recommending further scientific analyses to be explored utilizing the unique datasets presented.