Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025
Research article
 | 
07 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 07 Jan 2025

Ground-based contrail observations: comparisons with reanalysis weather data and contrail model simulations

Jade Low, Roger Teoh, Joel Ponsonby, Edward Gryspeerdt, Marc Shapiro, and Marc E. J. Stettler

Related authors

Efficacy of Scalable Airline-led Contrail Avoidance
Tharun Sankar, Thomas Dean, Tristan Abbott, Jill Blickstein, Alejandra Martín Frías, Mark Galyen, Rebecca Grenham, Paul Hodgson, Kevin McCloskey, Alan Pechman, Tyler Robarge, Dinesh Sanekommu, Aaron Sarna, Aaron Sonabend-W, Marc Stettler, Raimund Zopp, and Scott Geraedts
J. Env. Com. Air Transp. Sys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-4,https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-4, 2026
Preprint under review for JECATS
Short summary
Improving reanalysis weather for contrail validation by incorporating satellite observations
Scott Geraedts, Aaron Sarna, Susanne Rohs, Roger Teoh, and Kevin McCloskey
J. Env. Com. Air Transp. Sys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-6,https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-6, 2026
Preprint under review for JECATS
Short summary
Reconstructing albedo from mean cloud properties
Izabela Wojciechowska and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4571–4582, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4571-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4571-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluating simulations of ship tracks in a km-scale model
Anna Tippett, Paul R. Field, and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4251–4274, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4251-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4251-2026, 2026
Short summary
Observing the role of wind-driven processes in the evolution of warm marine cloud properties
Vishnu Nair, Edward Gryspeerdt, Antti Arola, Antti Lipponen, and Timo Virtanen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4049–4066, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4049-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4049-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Agarwal, A., Meijer, V. R., Eastham, S. D., Speth, R. L., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Reanalysis-driven simulations may overestimate persistent contrail formation by 100–250 %, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AC38D9, 2022. 
Bedka, S. T., Minnis, P., Duda, D. P., Chee, T. L., and Palikonda, R.: Properties of linear contrails in the Northern Hemisphere derived from 2006 Aqua MODIS observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 772–777, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054363, 2013. 
Bier, A. and Burkhardt, U.: Impact of Parametrizing Microphysical Processes in the Jet and Vortex Phase on Contrail Cirrus Properties and Radiative Forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036677, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036677, 2022. 
Bier, A., Unterstrasser, S., and Vancassel, X.: Box model trajectory studies of contrail formation using a particle-based cloud microphysics scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 823–845, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-823-2022, 2022. 
Download
Short summary
The radiative forcing due to contrails is of the same order of magnitude as aviation CO2 emissions but has a higher uncertainty. Observations are vital to improve our understanding of the contrail lifecycle, improve models, and measure the effect of mitigation action. Here, we use ground-based cameras combined with flight telemetry to track visible contrails and measure their lifetime and width. We evaluate model predictions and demonstrate the capability of this approach.
Share