Articles | Volume 11, issue 1
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 249–263, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-249-2018
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 249–263, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-249-2018

Research article 12 Jan 2018

Research article | 12 Jan 2018

Field intercomparison of prevailing sonic anemometers

Matthias Mauder and Matthias J. Zeeman

Related authors

Options to correct local turbulent flux measurements for large-scale fluxes using a LES-based approach
Matthias Mauder, Andreas Ibrom, Luise Wanner, Frederik De Roo, Peter Brugger, Ralf Kiese, and Kim Pilegaard
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-126,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-126, 2021
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Observing system simulation experiments double scientific return of surface-atmosphere synthesis
Stefan Metzger, David Durden, Sreenath Paleri, Matthias Sühring, Brian Butterworth, Christopher Florian, Matthias Mauder, David M. Plummer, Luise Wanner, Ke Xu, and Ankur R. Desai
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-86,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-86, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Development of an atmospheric chemistry model coupled to the PALM model system 6.0: implementation and first applications
Basit Khan, Sabine Banzhaf, Edward C. Chan, Renate Forkel, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Klaus Ketelsen, Mona Kurppa, Björn Maronga, Matthias Mauder, Siegfried Raasch, Emmanuele Russo, Martijn Schaap, and Matthias Sühring
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1171–1193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1171-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1171-2021, 2021
Short summary
High-resolution fully coupled atmospheric–hydrological modeling: a cross-compartment regional water and energy cycle evaluation
Benjamin Fersch, Alfonso Senatore, Bianca Adler, Joël Arnault, Matthias Mauder, Katrin Schneider, Ingo Völksch, and Harald Kunstmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2457–2481, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2457-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2457-2020, 2020
Overview of the PALM model system 6.0
Björn Maronga, Sabine Banzhaf, Cornelia Burmeister, Thomas Esch, Renate Forkel, Dominik Fröhlich, Vladimir Fuka, Katrin Frieda Gehrke, Jan Geletič, Sebastian Giersch, Tobias Gronemeier, Günter Groß, Wieke Heldens, Antti Hellsten, Fabian Hoffmann, Atsushi Inagaki, Eckhard Kadasch, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Klaus Ketelsen, Basit Ali Khan, Christoph Knigge, Helge Knoop, Pavel Krč, Mona Kurppa, Halim Maamari, Andreas Matzarakis, Matthias Mauder, Matthias Pallasch, Dirk Pavlik, Jens Pfafferott, Jaroslav Resler, Sascha Rissmann, Emmanuele Russo, Mohamed Salim, Michael Schrempf, Johannes Schwenkel, Gunther Seckmeyer, Sebastian Schubert, Matthias Sühring, Robert von Tils, Lukas Vollmer, Simon Ward, Björn Witha, Hauke Wurps, Julian Zeidler, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1335–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Suitability of fibre-optic distributed temperature sensing for revealing mixing processes and higher-order moments at the forest–air interface
Olli Peltola, Karl Lapo, Ilkka Martinkauppi, Ewan O'Connor, Christoph K. Thomas, and Timo Vesala
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2409–2427, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2409-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2409-2021, 2021
Short summary
Validation of Aeolus winds using radiosonde observations and numerical weather prediction model equivalents
Anne Martin, Martin Weissmann, Oliver Reitebuch, Michael Rennie, Alexander Geiß, and Alexander Cress
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2167–2183, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2167-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2167-2021, 2021
Short summary
Smartphone pressure data: quality control and impact on atmospheric analysis
Rumeng Li, Qinghong Zhang, Juanzhen Sun, Yun Chen, Lili Ding, and Tian Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 785–801, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-785-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-785-2021, 2021
Short summary
Automated precipitation monitoring with the Thies disdrometer: biases and ways for improvement
Michael Fehlmann, Mario Rohrer, Annakaisa von Lerber, and Markus Stoffel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4683–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4683-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4683-2020, 2020
Short summary
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
Adam Theisen, Max Ungar, Bryan Sheridan, and Bradley G. Illston
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4699–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4699-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4699-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Burns, S. P., Horst, T. W., Jacobsen, L., Blanken, P. D., and Monson, R. K.: Using sonic anemometer temperature to measure sensible heat flux in strong winds, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2095–2111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2095-2012, 2012. 
Dyer, A. J.: Flow distorsion by supporting structures, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 20, 243–251, 1981. 
Finkelstein, P. L. and Sims, P. F.: Sampling error in eddy correlation flux measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3503–3509, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900731, 2001. 
Foken, T. and Oncley, S. P.: Workshop on instrumental and methodical problems of land surface flux measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 1191–1193, 1995. 
Download