Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4959-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4959-2021
Research article
 | 
16 Jul 2021
Research article |  | 16 Jul 2021

Estimating the optical extinction of liquid water clouds in the cloud base region

Karolina Sarna, David P. Donovan, and Herman W. J. Russchenberg

Related authors

Monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions at the CESAR Observatory in the Netherlands
Karolina Sarna and Herman W. J. Russchenberg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1987–1997, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1987-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1987-2017, 2017
Ground-based remote sensing scheme for monitoring aerosol–cloud interactions
Karolina Sarna and Herman W. J. Russchenberg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1039–1050, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1039-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1039-2016, 2016

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Algorithm for continual monitoring of fog based on geostationary satellite imagery
Babak Jahani, Steffen Karalus, Julia Fuchs, Tobias Zech, Marina Zara, and Jan Cermak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1927–1941, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1927-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1927-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mitigation of satellite OCO-2 CO2 biases in the vicinity of clouds with 3D calculations using the Education and Research 3D Radiative Transfer Toolbox (EaR3T)
Yu-Wen Chen, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Steven T. Massie, Susan S. Kulawik, and Hironobu Iwabuchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1859–1884, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1859-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1859-2025, 2025
Short summary
Wet-radome attenuation in ARM cloud radars and its utilization in radar calibration using disdrometer measurements
Min Deng, Scott E. Giangrande, Michael P. Jensen, Karen Johnson, Christopher R. Williams, Jennifer M. Comstock, Ya-Chien Feng, Alyssa Matthews, Iosif A. Lindenmaier, Timothy G. Wendler, Marquette Rocque, Aifang Zhou, Zeen Zhu, Edward Luke, and Die Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1641–1657, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1641-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1641-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tomographic reconstruction algorithms for retrieving two-dimensional ice cloud microphysical parameters using along-track (sub)millimeter-wave radiometer observations
Yuli Liu and Ian Stuart Adams
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1659–1674, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1659-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1659-2025, 2025
Short summary
Empirical model for backscattering polarimetric variables in rain at W-band: motivation and implications
Alexander Myagkov, Tatiana Nomokonova, and Michael Frech
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1621–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1621-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Albrecht, B. A., Randall, D. A., and Nicholls, S.: Observations of marine stratocumulus clouds during FIRE, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 69, 618–626, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069<0618:OOMSCD>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Cao, X., Roy, G., Roy, N., and Bernier, R.: Comparison of the relationships between lidar integrated backscattered light and accumulated depolarization ratios for linear and circular polarization for water droplets, fog oil, and dust, Appl. Opt., 48, 4130–4141, 2009. a
Carnuth, W. and Reiter, R.: Cloud extinction profile measurements by lidar using Klett’s inversion method, Appl. Opt., 25, 2899, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.25.002899, 1986. a, b
Collis, R. T. H.: Lidar: A new atmospheric probe, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 220–230, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709239205, 1966. a
Donovan, D. P., Klein Baltink, H., Henzing, J. S., de Roode, S. R., and Siebesma, A. P.: A depolarisation lidar-based method for the determination of liquid-cloud microphysical properties, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 237–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-237-2015, 2015. a
Download
Short summary
We show a method for obtaining cloud optical extinction with a lidar system. We use a scheme in which a lidar signal is inverted based on the estimated value of cloud extinction at the far end of the cloud and apply a correction for multiple scattering within the cloud and a range resolution correction. By applying our technique, we show that it is possible to obtain the cloud optical extinction with an error better than 5 % up to 90 m within the cloud.
Share