Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3513-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3513-2022
Research article
 | 
14 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 14 Jun 2022

Characterization of tandem aerosol classifiers for selecting particles: implication for eliminating the multiple charging effect

Yao Song, Xiangyu Pei, Huichao Liu, Jiajia Zhou, and Zhibin Wang

Related authors

Technical note: Characterization of a single-beam gradient force aerosol optical tweezer for droplet trapping, phase transitions monitoring, and morphology studies
Xiangyu Pei, Yikan Meng, Yueling Chen, Huichao Liu, Yao Song, Zhengning Xu, Fei Zhang, Thomas C. Preston, and Zhibin Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2238,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2238, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Pressure-dependent performance of two CEN-specified condensation particle counters
Paulus S. Bauer, Dorian Spät, Martina Eisenhut, Andreas Gattringer, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4445–4460, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4445-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4445-2023, 2023
Short summary
Characterisation of a self-sustained, water-based condensation particle counter for aircraft cruising pressure level operation
Patrick Weber, Oliver F. Bischof, Benedikt Fischer, Marcel Berg, Susanne Hering, Steven Spielman, Gregory Lewis, Andreas Petzold, and Ulrich Bundke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3505–3514, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3505-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Importance of size representation and morphology in modelling optical properties of black carbon: comparison between laboratory measurements and model simulations
Baseerat Romshoo, Mira Pöhlker, Alfred Wiedensohler, Sascha Pfeifer, Jorge Saturno, Andreas Nowak, Krzysztof Ciupek, Paul Quincey, Konstantina Vasilatou, Michaela N. Ess, Maria Gini, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Chris Robins, François Gaie-Levrel, and Thomas Müller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6965–6989, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6965-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6965-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impact of particle size, refractive index, and shape on the determination of the particle scattering coefficient – an optical closure study evaluating different nephelometer angular truncation and illumination corrections
Marilena Teri, Thomas Müller, Josef Gasteiger, Sara Valentini, Helmuth Horvath, Roberta Vecchi, Paulus Bauer, Adrian Walser, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3161–3187, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3161-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3161-2022, 2022
Short summary
Quantification of major particulate matter species from a single filter type using infrared spectroscopy – application to a large-scale monitoring network
Bruno Debus, Andrew T. Weakley, Satoshi Takahama, Kathryn M. George, Anahita Amiri-Farahani, Bret Schichtel, Scott Copeland, Anthony S. Wexler, and Ann M. Dillner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2685–2702, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2685-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2685-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ait Ali Yahia, L., Gehin, E., and Sagot, B.: Application of the The Rmophoretic Annular Precipitator (TRAP) for the study of soot aggregates morphological influence on their thermophoretic behaviour, J. Aerosol Sci., 113, 40–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.018, 2017. 
Biskos, G., Malinowski, A., Russell, L. M., Buseck, P. R., and Martin, S. T.: Nanosize Effect on the Deliquescence and the Efflorescence of Sodium Chloride Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500484396, 2006. 
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521, 2006. 
Cheng, Y., Su, H., Koop, T., Mikhailov, E., and Pöschl, U.: Size dependence of phase transitions in aerosol nanoparticles, Nat. Commun., 6, 5923, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6923, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
Accurate particle classification is very important in aerosol studies. Differential mobility analyzers (DMAs), centrifugal particle mass analyzers (CPMAs), aerodynamic aerosol classifiers (AACs) and their tandem systems are commonly used. We demonstrated that DMA–CPMA is more susceptible to the multiple charging effect than DMA–AAC. It is not suggested to reduce the resolutions of the instruments, especially when selecting small-size soot particles.