Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3513-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3513-2022
Research article
 | 
14 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 14 Jun 2022

Characterization of tandem aerosol classifiers for selecting particles: implication for eliminating the multiple charging effect

Yao Song, Xiangyu Pei, Huichao Liu, Jiajia Zhou, and Zhibin Wang

Related authors

Measurement report: size-resolved particle effective density measured by the AAC-SMPS and implications for chemical composition
Yao Song, Jing Wei, Wenlong Zhao, Jinmei Ding, Xiangyu Pei, Fei Zhang, Zhengning Xu, Ruifang Shi, Ya Wei, Lu Zhang, Lingling Jin, and Zhibin Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3298,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3298, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Technical note: Characterization of a single-beam gradient force aerosol optical tweezer for droplet trapping, phase transition monitoring, and morphology studies
Xiangyu Pei, Yikan Meng, Yueling Chen, Huichao Liu, Yao Song, Zhengning Xu, Fei Zhang, Thomas C. Preston, and Zhibin Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5235–5246, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5235-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5235-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
An interlaboratory comparison to quantify oxidative potential measurement in aerosol particles: challenges and recommendations for harmonisation
Pamela A. Dominutti, Jean-Luc Jaffrezo, Anouk Marsal, Takoua Mhadhbi, Rhabira Elazzouzi, Camille Rak, Fabrizia Cavalli, Jean-Philippe Putaud, Aikaterini Bougiatioti, Nikolaos Mihalopoulos, Despina Paraskevopoulou, Ian S. Mudway, Athanasios Nenes, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, Catherine Banach, Steven J. Campbell, Hana Cigánková, Daniele Contini, Greg Evans, Maria Georgopoulou, Manuella Ghanem, Drew A. Glencross, Maria Rachele Guascito, Hartmut Herrmann, Saima Iram, Maja Jovanović, Milena Jovašević-Stojanović, Markus Kalberer, Ingeborg M. Kooter, Suzanne E. Paulson, Anil Patel, Esperanza Perdrix, Maria Chiara Pietrogrande, Pavel Mikuška, Jean-Jacques Sauvain, Aikaterina Seitanidi, Pourya Shahpoury, Eduardo J. S. Souza, Sarah Steimer, Svetlana Stevanovic, Guillaume Suarez, P. S. Ganesh Subramanian, Battist Utinger, Marloes F. van Os, Vishal Verma, Xing Wang, Rodney J. Weber, Yuhan Yang, Xavier Querol, Gerard Hoek, Roy M. Harrison, and Gaëlle Uzu
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-107,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-107, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Quantifying the uncertainties in thermal–optical analysis of carbonaceous aircraft engine emissions: an interlaboratory study
Timothy A. Sipkens, Joel C. Corbin, Brett Smith, Stéphanie Gagné, Prem Lobo, Benjamin T. Brem, Mark P. Johnson, and Gregory J. Smallwood
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4291–4302, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4291-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4291-2024, 2024
Short summary
Pressure-dependent performance of two CEN-specified condensation particle counters
Paulus S. Bauer, Dorian Spät, Martina Eisenhut, Andreas Gattringer, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4445–4460, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4445-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4445-2023, 2023
Short summary
Characterisation of a self-sustained, water-based condensation particle counter for aircraft cruising pressure level operation
Patrick Weber, Oliver F. Bischof, Benedikt Fischer, Marcel Berg, Susanne Hering, Steven Spielman, Gregory Lewis, Andreas Petzold, and Ulrich Bundke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3505–3514, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3505-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Importance of size representation and morphology in modelling optical properties of black carbon: comparison between laboratory measurements and model simulations
Baseerat Romshoo, Mira Pöhlker, Alfred Wiedensohler, Sascha Pfeifer, Jorge Saturno, Andreas Nowak, Krzysztof Ciupek, Paul Quincey, Konstantina Vasilatou, Michaela N. Ess, Maria Gini, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Chris Robins, François Gaie-Levrel, and Thomas Müller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6965–6989, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6965-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6965-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ait Ali Yahia, L., Gehin, E., and Sagot, B.: Application of the The Rmophoretic Annular Precipitator (TRAP) for the study of soot aggregates morphological influence on their thermophoretic behaviour, J. Aerosol Sci., 113, 40–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.018, 2017. 
Biskos, G., Malinowski, A., Russell, L. M., Buseck, P. R., and Martin, S. T.: Nanosize Effect on the Deliquescence and the Efflorescence of Sodium Chloride Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500484396, 2006. 
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 27–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521, 2006. 
Cheng, Y., Su, H., Koop, T., Mikhailov, E., and Pöschl, U.: Size dependence of phase transitions in aerosol nanoparticles, Nat. Commun., 6, 5923, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6923, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
Accurate particle classification is very important in aerosol studies. Differential mobility analyzers (DMAs), centrifugal particle mass analyzers (CPMAs), aerodynamic aerosol classifiers (AACs) and their tandem systems are commonly used. We demonstrated that DMA–CPMA is more susceptible to the multiple charging effect than DMA–AAC. It is not suggested to reduce the resolutions of the instruments, especially when selecting small-size soot particles.