Articles | Volume 15, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5497-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5497-2022
Research article
 | 
27 Sep 2022
Research article |  | 27 Sep 2022

A new machine-learning-based analysis for improving satellite-retrieved atmospheric composition data: OMI SO2 as an example

Can Li, Joanna Joiner, Fei Liu, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Vitali Fioletov, and Chris McLinden

Related authors

Estimation of anthropogenic and volcanic SO2 emissions from satellite data in the presence of snow/ice on the ground
Vitali E. Fioletov, Chris A. McLinden, Debora Griffin, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Can Li, Joanna Joiner, Nicolas Theys, and Simon Carn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5575–5592, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5575-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Use of machine learning and principal component analysis to retrieve nitrogen dioxide (NO2) with hyperspectral imagers and reduce noise in spectral fitting
Joanna Joiner, Sergey Marchenko, Zachary Fasnacht, Lok Lamsal, Can Li, Alexander Vasilkov, and Nickolay Krotkov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 481–500, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-481-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Ground-level gaseous pollutants (NO2, SO2, and CO) in China: daily seamless mapping and spatiotemporal variations
Jing Wei, Zhanqing Li, Jun Wang, Can Li, Pawan Gupta, and Maureen Cribb
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1511–1532, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1511-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1511-2023, 2023
Short summary
Version 2 of the global catalogue of large anthropogenic and volcanic SO2 sources and emissions derived from satellite measurements
Vitali E. Fioletov, Chris A. McLinden, Debora Griffin, Ihab Abboud, Nickolay Krotkov, Peter J. T. Leonard, Can Li, Joanna Joiner, Nicolas Theys, and Simon Carn
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 75–93, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-75-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of SO2, SO42− and an updated SO2 dry deposition parameterization in the United Kingdom Earth System Model
Catherine Hardacre, Jane P. Mulcahy, Richard J. Pope, Colin G. Jones, Steven T. Rumbold, Can Li, Colin Johnson, and Steven T. Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18465–18497, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18465-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18465-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Advantages of assimilating multispectral satellite retrievals of atmospheric composition: a demonstration using MOPITT carbon monoxide products
Wenfu Tang, Benjamin Gaubert, Louisa Emmons, Daniel Ziskin, Debbie Mao, David Edwards, Avelino Arellano, Kevin Raeder, Jeffrey Anderson, and Helen Worden
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1941–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1941-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1941-2024, 2024
Short summary
An improved OMI ozone profile research product version 2.0 with collection 4 L1b data and algorithm updates
Juseon Bak, Xiong Liu, Kai Yang, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Ewan O'Sullivan, Kelly Chance, and Cheol-Hee Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1891–1911, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1891-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1891-2024, 2024
Short summary
Tropospheric ozone column dataset from OMPS-LP/OMPS-NM limb–nadir matching
Andrea Orfanoz-Cheuquelaf, Carlo Arosio, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Annette Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, John P. Burrows, Anne M. Thompson, Ryan M. Stauffer, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1791–1809, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Version 8 IMK/IAA MIPAS measurements of CFC-11, CFC-12, and HCFC-22
Gabriele P. Stiller, Thomas von Clarmann, Norbert Glatthor, Udo Grabowski, Sylvia Kellmann, Michael Kiefer, Alexandra Laeng, Andrea Linden, Bernd Funke, Maya García-Comas, and Manuel López-Puertas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1759–1789, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1759-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1759-2024, 2024
Short summary
The importance of digital elevation model accuracy in XCO2 retrievals: improving the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space version 11 retrieval product
Nicole Jacobs, Christopher W. O'Dell, Thomas E. Taylor, Thomas L. Logan, Brendan Byrne, Matthäus Kiel, Rigel Kivi, Pauli Heikkinen, Aronne Merrelli, Vivienne H. Payne, and Abhishek Chatterjee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1375–1401, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1375-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1375-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bhartia, P. K.: OMI/Aura Ozone (O3) Total Column 1-Orbit L2 Swath 13x24 km V003, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], Greenbelt, MD, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2024, 2005. 
Castellanos, P. and da Silva, A.: A neural network correction to the scalar approximation in radiative transfer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 36, 819–832, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0003.1, 2019. 
Chan, K. L., Khorsandi, E., Liu, S., Baier, F., and Valks, P.: Estimation of surface NO2 concentrations over Germany from TROPOMI satellite observations using a machine learning method, Remote Sens., 13, 969, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050969, 2021. 
Chimot, J., Veefkind, J. P., Vlemmix, T., de Haan, J. F., Amiridis, V., Proestakis, E., Marinou, E., and Levelt, P. F.: An exploratory study on the aerosol height retrieval from OMI measurements of the 477 nm O2 – O2 spectral band using a neural network approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 783–809, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-783-2017, 2017. 
De Santis, D., Petracca, I., Corradini, S., Guerrieri, L., Picchiani, M., Merucci, L., Stelitano, D., Del Frate, F., Prata, F., and Schiavon, G.: Volcanic SO2 near-real time retrieval using TROPOMI data and neural networks: The December 2018 Etna test case, 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium, 12–16 July 2021, 8480–8483, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9554915, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Satellite observations provide information on the sources of SO2, an important pollutant that affects both air quality and climate. However, these observations suffer from relatively poor data quality due to weak signals of SO2. Here, we use a machine learning technique to analyze satellite SO2 observations in order to reduce the noise and artifacts over relatively clean areas while keeping the signals near pollution sources. This leads to significant improvement in satellite SO2 data.