Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022
Research article
 | 
23 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 23 Feb 2022

Cloud microphysical measurements at a mountain observatory: comparison between shadowgraph imaging and phase Doppler interferometry

Moein Mohammadi, Jakub L. Nowak, Guus Bertens, Jan Moláček, Wojciech Kumala, and Szymon P. Malinowski

Related authors

Applicability of the low-cost OPC-N3 optical particle counter for microphysical measurements of fog
Katarzyna Nurowska, Moein Mohammadi, Szymon Malinowski, and Krzysztof Markowicz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2415–2430, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2415-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2415-2023, 2023
Short summary
Applicability of the VisiSize D30 shadowgraph system for cloud microphysical measurements
Jakub L. Nowak, Moein Mohammadi, and Szymon P. Malinowski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2615–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2615-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2615-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Identifying the seeding signature in cloud particles from hydrometeor residuals
Mahen Konwar, Benjamin Werden, Edward C. Fortner, Sudarsan Bera, Mercy Varghese, Subharthi Chowdhuri, Kurt Hibert, Philip Croteau, John Jayne, Manjula Canagaratna, Neelam Malap, Sandeep Jayakumar, Shivsai A. Dixit, Palani Murugavel, Duncan Axisa, Darrel Baumgardner, Peter F. DeCarlo, Doug R. Worsnop, and Thara Prabhakaran
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2387–2400, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Design and rocket deployment of a trackable pseudo-Lagrangian drifter-based meteorological probe into the Lawrence/Linwood EF4 tornado and mesocyclone on 28 May 2019
Reed Timmer, Mark Simpson, Sean Schofer, and Curtis Brooks
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 943–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-943-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-943-2024, 2024
Short summary
A Light-Weight Holographic Imager for Cloud Microphysical Studies from an Untethered Balloon
Thomas Edward Chambers, Iain Murray Reid, and Murray Hamilton
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3019,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3019, 2024
Short summary
A comparative analysis of in situ measurements of high-altitude cirrus in the tropics
Francesco Cairo, Martina Krämer, Armin Afchine, Guido Di Donfrancesco, Luca Di Liberto, Sergey Khaykin, Lorenza Lucaferri, Valentin Mitev, Max Port, Christian Rolf, Marcel Snels, Nicole Spelten, Ralf Weigel, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4899–4925, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4899-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4899-2023, 2023
Short summary
In situ ground-based mobile measurement of lightning events above central Europe
Jakub Kákona, Jan Mikeš, Iva Ambrožová, Ondřej Ploc, Olena Velychko, Lembit Sihver, and Martin Kákona
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 547–561, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-547-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-547-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Bachalo, W. D.: Method for measuring the size and velocity of spheres by dual-beam light-scatter interferometry, Appl. Optics, 19, 363–370, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.19.000363, 1980. a
Bachalo, W. D. and Houser, M. J.: Phase/Doppler Spray Analyzer For Simultaneous Measurements Of Drop Size And Velocity Distributions, Opt. Eng., 23, 235583, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.7973341, 1984. a, b
Bachalo, W. D. and Sankar, S. V.: Phase doppler particle analyzer, in: Handbook of Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn., edited by: Johnson, R. W., CRC Press, Boca Raton, https://doi.org/10.1201/b19031, 2016. a
Beals, M. J., Fugal, J. P., Shaw, R. A., Lu, J., Spuler, S. M., and Stith, J. L.: Holographic measurements of inhomogeneous cloud mixing at the centimeter scale, Science, 350, 87–90, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0751, 2015. a
Beck, A., Henneberger, J., Schöpfer, S., Fugal, J., and Lohmann, U.: HoloGondel: in situ cloud observations on a cable car in the Swiss Alps using a holographic imager, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 459–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-459-2017, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
To compare two instruments, a VisiSize D30 shadowgraph system and a phase Doppler interferometer (PDI-FPDR), we performed a series of measurements of cloud droplet size and number concentration in orographic clouds. After applying essential modifications and filters to the data, the results from the two instruments showed better agreement in droplet sizing and velocimetry than droplet number concentration or liquid water content. Discrepancies were observed for droplets smaller than 13 µm.