Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3237-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3237-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A lightweight holographic imager for cloud microphysical studies from an untethered balloon
Thomas Edward Chambers
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Iain Murray Reid
School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
ATRAD Pty. Ltd., 154 Ashley St., Underdale, SA 5032, Australia
Murray Hamilton
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Related authors
No articles found.
Wen Yi, Jianyuan Wang, Xianghui Xue, Chengyun Yang, Iain M. Reid, Robert A. Vincent, Andrew Mackinnon, Damian J. Murphy, Njål Gulbrandsen, Masaki Tsutsumi, Baiqi Ning, Guozhu Li, Nicholas J. Mitchell, Tracy Moffat-Griffin, Toshitaka Tsuda, Alan Z. Liu, Zishun Qiao, Haiying Li, Paulo P. Batista, Jianfei Wu, Tingdi Chen, and Xiankang Dou
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1883, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides observational evidence that the solar zenith angle (SZA) influences the vertical structure of diurnal tides in the MLT region. Diurnal tides are strongest at low and mid-latitudes (10–50° N/S) and weaker near the Equator and at polar latitudes. The results further suggest that background zonal winds influence tidal propagation and structure through filtering and momentum drag.
Zishun Qiao, Alan Z. Liu, Gunter Stober, Javier Fuentes, Fabio Vargas, Christian L. Adami, and Iain M. Reid
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1091–1104, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1091-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1091-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the installation of the Chilean Observation Network De Meteor Radars (CONDOR) and its initial results. The routine winds are point-to-point comparable to the co-located lidar winds. The retrievals of spatially resolved horizontal wind fields and vertical winds are also facilitated, benefiting from the extensive meteor detections. The successful deployment and maintenance of CONDOR provide 24/7 and state-of-the-art wind measurements to the research community.
Jianyuan Wang, Na Li, Wen Yi, Xianghui Xue, Iain M. Reid, Jianfei Wu, Hailun Ye, Jian Li, Zonghua Ding, Jinsong Chen, Guozhu Li, Yaoyu Tian, Boyuan Chang, Jiajing Wu, and Lei Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13299–13315, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13299-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13299-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the impact of quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) disruption events on diurnal tides over the low- and mid-latitude MLT region observed by a meteor radar chain. By using a global atmospheric model and reanalysis data, it is found that the stratospheric QBO winds can affect the mesospheric diurnal tides by modulating the subtropical ozone variability in the upper stratosphere and the interaction between tides and gravity waves in the mesosphere.
Qingchen Xu, Iain Murray Reid, Bing Cai, Christian Adami, Zengmao Zhang, Mingliang Zhao, and Wen Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2957–2975, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2957-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2957-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To have better understanding of the dynamics of the lower and middle atmosphere, we installed a newly designed dual-frequency radar system that uses 53.8 MHz for near-ground to 20 km wind measurements and 35.0 MHz for 70 to 100 km wind measurements. The initial results show its good performance, along with the analysis of typical winter gravity wave activities.
Wen Yi, Jie Zeng, Xianghui Xue, Iain Reid, Wei Zhong, Jianfei Wu, Tingdi Chen, and Xiankang Dou
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-254, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-254, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, the concept of multistatic meteor radar systems has attracted the attention of the atmospheric radar community, focusing on the MLT region. In this study, we apply a multistatic meteor radar system consisting of a monostatic meteor radar in Mengcheng (33.36° N, 116.49° E) and a remote receiver in Changfeng (31.98° N, 117.22° E) to estimate the two-dimensional horizontal wind field, and the horizontal divergence and relative vorticity of the wind field.
Joel P. Younger, Iain M. Reid, Chris L. Adami, Chris M. Hall, and Masaki Tsutsumi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5015–5027, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5015-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5015-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A radar in Svalbard usually used to study meteor trails was used to observe a thin icy layer in the upper atmosphere. New methods used the layer to measure wind speed over short periods of time and found that the layer is most reflective within 6.8 ± 3.3° of vertical. Analysis of meteor trail radar echo durations found that the layer may shorten meteor trail echoes, but more data are needed. This study shows new uses for data collected by meteor radars for other purposes.
Wei Zhong, Xianghui Xue, Wen Yi, Iain M. Reid, Tingdi Chen, and Xiankang Dou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3973–3988, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3973-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3973-2021, 2021
Cited articles
Ahn, E., Huang, Y., Chubb, T. H., Baumgardner, D., Isaac, P., de Hoog, M., Siems, S. T., and Manton, M. J.: In situ observations of wintertime low-altitude clouds over the Southern Ocean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1381–1394, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3011, 2017. a, b, c, d
Ahn, E., Huang, Y., Siems, S. T., and Manton, M. J.: A Comparison of Cloud Microphysical Properties Derived From MODIS and CALIPSO With In Situ Measurements Over the Wintertime Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 11120–11140, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028535, 2018. a
Baumgardner, D., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Cotton, R., Crosier, J., Field, P., Gurganus, C., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krämer, M., Lawson, P., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and Um, J.: Cloud Ice Properties: In Situ Measurement Challenges, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0011.1, 2017. a, b
Beals, M. J., Fugal, J. P., Shaw, R. A., Lu, J., Spuler, S. M., and Stith, J. L.: Holographic measurements of inhomogeneous cloud mixing at the centimeter scale, Science, 350, 87–90, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0751, 2015. a
Beck, A., Henneberger, J., Schöpfer, S., Fugal, J., and Lohmann, U.: HoloGondel: in situ cloud observations on a cable car in the Swiss Alps using a holographic imager, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 459–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-459-2017, 2017. a
Beck, A., Henneberger, J., Fugal, J. P., David, R. O., Lacher, L., and Lohmann, U.: Impact of surface and near-surface processes on ice crystal concentrations measured at mountain-top research stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8909–8927, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8909-2018, 2018. a
Bessho, K., Date, K., Hayashi, M., Ikeda, A., Imai, T., Inoue, H., Kumagai, Y., Miyakawa, T., Murata, H., Ohno, T., Okuyama, A., Oyama, R., Sasaki, Y., Shimazu, Y., Shimoji, K., Sumida, Y., Suzuki, M., Taniguchi, H., Tsuchiyama, H., Uesawa, D., Yokota, H., and Yoshida, R.: An introduction to Himawari-8/9 – Japan's new-generation geostationary meteorological satellites, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 94, 151–183, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-009, 2016. a
Boers, R., Jensen, J. B., and Krummel, P. B.: Microphysical and short-wave radiative structure of stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean: Summer results and seasonal differences, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 151–168, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712454507, 1998. a, b
Chambers, T.: Digital Holographic Studies of Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics, PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, https://hdl.handle.net/2440/136408 (last access: 21 May 2024), 2022. a
Chambers, T. E., Reid, I. M., and Hamilton, M.: Data from the Untethered Balloon Launch of a Holographic Imager Into Cloud Near Adelaide, South Australia in August 2020, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10297799, 2023. a
Chubb, T. H., Siems, S. T., and Manton, M. J.: On the Decline of Wintertime Precipitation in the Snowy Mountains of Southeastern Australia, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 1483–1497, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10-05021.1, 2011. a
Delene, D. J. and Deshler, T.: Vertical profiles of cloud condensation nuclei above Wyoming, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 12579–12588, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900800, 2001. a
Desai, N., Glienke, S., Fugal, J., and Shaw, R. A.: Search for Microphysical Signatures of Stochastic Condensation in Marine Boundary Layer Clouds Using Airborne Digital Holography, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 2739–2752, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029033, 2019. a
Forster, P., Storelvmo, T., Armour, K., Collins, W., Dufresne, J.-L., Frame, D., Lunt, D., Mauritsen, T., Palmer, M., Watanabe, M., Wild, M., and Zhang, H.: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S., Pean, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T., Waterfield, T., Yelekci, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Chap. 7, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021. a
Garcia-Sucerquia, J., Xu, W., Jericho, S. K., Klages, P., Jericho, M. H., and Kreuzer, H. J.: Digital in-line holographic microscopy, Appl. Optics, 45, 836–850, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.000836, 2006. a, b
Gultepe, I., Sharman, R., WIlliams, P. D., Zhou, B., Ellrod, G., Minnis, P., Trier, S., Griffin, S., Yum, S. S., Gharabaghi, B., Feltz, W., Temimi, M., Pu, Z., Storer, L. N., Kneringer, P., Wetson, M. J., Chuang, H.-Y., Thobois, L., Dimri, A. P., Dietz, S. J., Franca, G. B., Almeida, M. V., and Albquerque Neto, F. L.: A Review of High Impact Weather for Aviation Meteorology, Pure Appl. Geophys., 176, 1869–1921, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02168-6, 2019. a
Hahn, J., Reyes, R. D. L., Bernlöhr, K., Krüger, P., Lo, Y. T. E., Chadwick, P. M., Daniel, M. K., Deil, C., Gast, H., Kosack, K., and Marandon, V.: Impact of aerosols and adverse atmospheric conditions on the data quality for spectral analysis of the H.E.S.S. telescopes, Astropart. Phys., 54, 25–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.10.003, 2014. a
Hamann, U., Walther, A., Baum, B., Bennartz, R., Bugliaro, L., Derrien, M., Francis, P. N., Heidinger, A., Joro, S., Kniffka, A., Le Gléau, H., Lockhoff, M., Lutz, H.-J., Meirink, J. F., Minnis, P., Palikonda, R., Roebeling, R., Thoss, A., Platnick, S., Watts, P., and Wind, G.: Remote sensing of cloud top pressure/height from SEVIRI: analysis of ten current retrieval algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2839–2867, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2839-2014, 2014. a
Hamilton, M., Alexander, S. P., Protat, A., Siems, S., and Carpentier, S.: Polarimetric backscatter sonde observations of southern ocean clouds and aerosols, Atmosphere, 11, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.3390/ATMOS11040399, 2020. a, b, c, d
Henneberger, J., Fugal, J. P., Stetzer, O., and Lohmann, U.: HOLIMO II: a digital holographic instrument for ground-based in situ observations of microphysical properties of mixed-phase clouds, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2975–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2975-2013, 2013. a
Hogan, R. J., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., and Poiares Baptista, J. P.: Characteristics of mixed-phase clouds. II: A climatology from ground-based lidar, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 2117–2134, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.01.209, 2003. a
Huang, Y., Protat, A., Siems, S. T., and Manton, M. J.: A-Train Observations of Maritime Midlatitude Storm-Track Cloud Systems: Comparing the Southern Ocean against the North Atlantic, J. Climate, 28, 1920–1939, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00169.1, 2015. a
Huang, Y., Siems, S., Manton, M., Protat, A., Majewski, L., and Nguyen, H.: Evaluating Himawari-8 Cloud Products Using Shipborne and CALIPSO Observations : Cloud-Top Height and Cloud-Top Temperature, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 36, 2327–2347, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0231.1, 2019. a
Ishida, H. and Nakajima, T. Y.: Development of an unbiased cloud detection algorithm for a spaceborne multispectral imager, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010710, 2009. a
Johnson, A., Lasher-Trapp, S., Bansemer, A., Ulanowski, Z., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Difficulties in early ice detection with the small ice Detector-2 HIAPER (SID-2H) in maritime cumuli, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 1263–1275, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00079.1, 2014. a
Kang, L., Marchand, R., and Smith, W.: Evaluation of MODIS and Himawari-8 Low Clouds Retrievals Over the Southern Ocean With In Situ Measurements From the SOCRATES Campaign, Earth Space Sci., 8, 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001397, 2021. a
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1, 2017. a
Kawamoto, K., Nakajima, T., and Nakajima, T. Y.: A Global Determination of Cloud Microphysics with AVHRR Remote Sensing, J. Climate, 14, 2054–2068, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2054:AGDOCM>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Korolev, A. and Isaac, G. A.: Shattering during sampling by OAPs and HVPS. Part I: Snow particles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 22, 528–542, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1720.1, 2005. a
Korolev, A. and Isaac, G. A.: Relative Humidity in Liquid, Mixed-Phase, and Ice Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2865–2880, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3784.1, 2006. a
Kuma, P., McDonald, A. J., Morgenstern, O., Alexander, S. P., Cassano, J. J., Garrett, S., Halla, J., Hartery, S., Harvey, M. J., Parsons, S., Plank, G., Varma, V., and Williams, J.: Evaluation of Southern Ocean cloud in the HadGEM3 general circulation model and MERRA-2 reanalysis using ship-based observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6607–6630, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6607-2020, 2020. a
Lance, S.: Coincidence Errors in a Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and a Cloud and Aerosol Spectrometer (CAS), and the Improved Performance of a Modified CDP, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 29, 1532–1541, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00208.1, 2012. a
MacCready, P. B. and Todd, C. J.: Continuous Particle Sampler, J. Appl. Meteorol., 3, 450–460, 1964. a
Mace, G. G. and Protat, A.: Clouds over the Southern Ocean as Observed from the R/V Investigator during CAPRICORN. Part I: Cloud Occurrence and Phase Partitioning, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 57, 1783–1803, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0194.1, 2018. a, b
Mace, G. G., Protat, A., Humphries, R. S., Alexander, S. P., Mcrobert, I. M., Ward, J., Selleck, P., Keywood, M., and Mcfarquhar, G. M.: Southern Ocean Cloud Properties Derived From CAPRICORN and MARCUS Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033368, 2021. a
Magee, N., Boaggio, K., Staskiewicz, S., Lynn, A., Zhao, X., Tusay, N., Schuh, T., Bandamede, M., Bancroft, L., Connelly, D., Hurler, K., Miner, B., and Khoudary, E.: Captured cirrus ice particles in high definition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7171–7185, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7171-2021, 2021. a
McCluskey, C. S., DeMott, P. J., Ma, P.-L., and Burrows, S. M.: Numerical Representations of Marine Ice-Nucleating Particles in Remote Marine Environments Evaluated Against Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7838–7847, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081861, 2019. a
Mccoy, I. L., Mccoy, D. T., Wood, R., Regayre, L., Watson-parris, D., Grosvenor, D. P., Mulcahy, J. P., Hu, Y., Bender, F. A.-M., Field, P. R., Carslaw, K. S., and Gordon, H.: The hemispheric contrast in cloud microphysical properties constrains aerosol forcing, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 18998–19006, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922502117, 2020. a
Mccoy, I. L., Bretherton, C. S., Wood, R., Twohy, C. H., Gettelman, A., Bardeen, C. G., and Toohey, D. W.: Influences of Recent Particle Formation on Southern Ocean Aerosol Variability and Low Cloud Properties, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033529, 2021. a
McFarquhar, G. M., Bretherton, C., Marchand, R., Protat, A., DeMott, P. J., Alexander, S. P., Roberts, G. C., Twohy, C. H., Toohey, D., Siems, S., Huang, Y., Wood, R., Rauber, R. M., Lasher-Trapp, S., Jensen, J., Stith, J., Mace, J., Um, J., Järvinen, E., Schnaiter, M., Gettelman, A., Sanchez, K. J., McCluskey, C. S., Russell, L. M., McCoy, I. L., Atlas, R., Bardeen, C. G., Moore, K. A., Hill, T. C. J., Humphries, R. S., Keywood, M. D., Ristovski, Z., Cravigan, L., Schofield, R., Fairall, C., Mallet, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Rainwater, B., D'Alessandro, J., Wang, Y., Wu, W., Saliba, G., Levin, E. J. T., Ding, S., Lang, F., Truong, S. C., Wolff, C., Haggerty, J., Harvey, M. J., Klekociuk, A., and McDonald, A.: Observations of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and surface radiation over the Southern Ocean: An overview of CAPRICORN, MARCUS, MICRE and SOCRATES, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E894–E928, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-20-0132.1, 2021. a, b
Miles, N. L., Verlinde, J., and Clothiaux, E. E.: Cloud droplet size distributions in low-level stratiform clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 295–311, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0295:CDSDIL>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a, b, c
Morrison, H., Walqui, M. V. L., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W., Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A., Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-I., Diedenhoven, B. V., and Xue, L.: Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 12, e2019MS001689, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689, 2020. a, b
Murakami, M. and Matsuo, T.: Development of the Hydrometeor Videosonde, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 7, 613–620, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0613:DOTHV>2.0.CO;2, 1990. a
O, K.-T., Wood, R., and Bretherton, C. S.: Ultraclean Layers and Optically Thin Clouds in the Stratocumulus-to-Cumulus Transition. Part II: Depletion of Cloud Droplets and Cloud Condensation Nuclei through Collision – Coalescence, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1653–1673, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0218.1, 2018. a
Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, 2nd edn., Springer Dordrecht, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48100-0, 2010. a
Ramelli, F., Beck, A., Henneberger, J., and Lohmann, U.: Using a holographic imager on a tethered balloon system for microphysical observations of boundary layer clouds, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 925–939, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-925-2020, 2020. a, b
Ratcliffe, J. A.: Some Aspects of Diffraction Theory and their Application to the Ionosphere, Rep. Prog. Phys., 19, 188–267, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/19/1/306, 1956. a
Sassen, K., Wang, Z., Khvorostyanov, V. I., Stephens, G. L., and Bennedetti, A.: Cirrus Cloud Ice Water Content Radar Algorithm Evaluation Using an Explicit Cloud Microphysical Model, J. Appl. Meteorol., 41, 620–628, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0620:CCIWCR>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Schlenczek, O., Fugal, J. P., Lloyd, G., Bower, K. N., Choularton, T. W., Flynn, M., Crosier, J., and Borrmann, S.: Microphysical Properties of Ice Crystal Precipitation and Surface-Generated Ice Crystals in a High Alpine Environment in Switzerland, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 433–453, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0060.1, 2017. a
Schnars, U. and Jüptner, W.: Direct recording of holograms by a CCD target and numerical reconstruction, Appl. Optics, 33, 179–181, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.000179, 1994. a, b
Schuyler, T. J., Gohari, S. M. I., Pundsack, G., Berchoff, D., and Guzman, M. I.: Using a Balloon-Launched Unmanned Glider to Validate Real-Time WRF Modeling, Sensors-Basel, 19, 1914, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081914, 2019. a
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2078, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1, 2015. a
Takahashi, T., Sugimoto, S., Kawano, T., and Suzuki, K.: Microphysical Structure and Lightning Initiation in Hokuriku Winter Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13156–13181, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030227, 2019. a
Ulanowski, Z., Kaye, P. H., Hirst, E., Greenaway, R. S., Cotton, R. J., Hesse, E., and Collier, C. T.: Incidence of rough and irregular atmospheric ice particles from Small Ice Detector 3 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1649–1662, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1649-2014, 2014. a
Um, J., McFarquhar, G. M., Hong, Y. P., Lee, S.-S., Jung, C. H., Lawson, R. P., and Mo, Q.: Dimensions and aspect ratios of natural ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3933–3956, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3933-2015, 2015. a
University of Wyoming: 94672 YPAD Adelaide Airport Observations at 00Z 08 Aug 2020, University of Wyoming, https://weather.uwyo.edu/cgi-bin/sounding?region=pac&TYPE=TEXT%3ALIST&YEAR=2020&MONTH=08&FROM=0800&TO=0812&STNM=94672&ICE=1&REPLOT=1 (last access: 12 March 2024), 2020. a
Vergara-Temprado, J., Miltenberger, A. K., Furtado, K., Grosvenor, D. P., Shipway, B. J., Hill, A. A., Wilkinson, J. M., Field, P. R., Murray, B. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Strong Control of Southern Ocean Cloud Reflectivity by Ice-Nucleating Particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 2687–2692, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721627115, 2018. a
Weitkamp, C.: Lidar; Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Springer Science+Business Media Inc., New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/b106786, 2005. a
Westbrook, C. D., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., and Hogan, R. J.: Doppler lidar measurements of oriented planar ice crystals falling from supercooled and glaciated layer clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 260–276, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.528, 2010. a
Winker, D. M., Pelon, J., Coakley, J. A., Ackerman, S. A., Charlson, R. J., Colarco, P. R., Flamant, P., Fu, Q., Hoff, R. M., Kittaka, C., Kubar, T. L., Le Treut, H., McCormick, M. P., Mégie, G., Poole, L., Powell, K., Trepte, K., Vaughan, M. A., and Wielicki, B. A.: The Calipso Mission: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1211–1229, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3009.1, 2010. a
Wofsy, S. C.: HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained, global-scale measurements of gases and aerosols, Philos. T. Roy. Soc., 369, 2073–2086, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0313, 2011. a, b
Wood, R., O, K.-T., Bretherton, C. S., Mohrmann, J., Albrecht, B. A., Zuidema, P., Ghate, V., Schwartz, C., Eloranta, E., Glienke, S., Shaw, R. A., Fugal, J., and Minnis, P.: Ultraclean Layers and Optically Thin Clouds in the Stratocumulus-to-Cumulus Transition. Part I: Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1631–1652, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0213.1, 2018. a
Yang, P., Hioki, S., Saito, M., Kuo, C.-P., Baum, B. A., and Liou, K.-N.: A review of ice cloud optical property models for passive satellite remote sensing, Atmosphere, 9, 1–31, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9120499, 2018. a
Short summary
Clouds have been identified as the largest source of uncertainty in climate modelling. We report an untethered balloon launch of a holographic imager through clouds. This is the first time a holographic imager has been deployed in this way, enabled by the light weight and low cost of the imager. This work creates the potential to significantly increase the availability of cloud microphysical measurements required for the calibration and validation of climate models and remote sensing methods.
Clouds have been identified as the largest source of uncertainty in climate modelling. We report...