Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1115-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1115-2025
Research article
 | 
05 Mar 2025
Research article |  | 05 Mar 2025

Factors limiting contrail detection in satellite imagery

Oliver G. A. Driver, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Edward Gryspeerdt

Related authors

Model analysis of biases in the satellite-diagnosed aerosol effect on the cloud liquid water path
Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Silvia M. Calderón, Sami Romakkaniemi, Antti Lipponen, Aapo Peräkorpi, Tero Mielonen, Edward Gryspeerdt, Timo Henrik Virtanen, Pekka Kolmonen, and Antti Arola
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1533–1543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1533-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Forecasting contrail climate forcing for flight planning and air traffic management applications: the CocipGrid model in pycontrails 0.51.0
Zebediah Engberg, Roger Teoh, Tristan Abbott, Thomas Dean, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Marc L. Shapiro
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 253–286, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025, 2025
Short summary
Ground-based contrail observations: comparisons with reanalysis weather data and contrail model simulations
Jade Low, Roger Teoh, Joel Ponsonby, Edward Gryspeerdt, Marc Shapiro, and Marc E. J. Stettler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 37–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-37-2025, 2025
Short summary
Weak liquid water path response in ship tracks
Anna Tippett, Edward Gryspeerdt, Peter Manshausen, Philip Stier, and Tristan W. P. Smith
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13269–13283, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13269-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13269-2024, 2024
Short summary
Air mass history linked to the development of Arctic mixed-phase clouds
Rebecca J. Murray-Watson and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11115–11132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11115-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Evaluating spectral cloud effective radius retrievals from the Enhanced MODIS Airborne Simulator (eMAS) during ORACLES
Kerry Meyer, Steven Platnick, G. Thomas Arnold, Nandana Amarasinghe, Daniel Miller, Jennifer Small-Griswold, Mikael Witte, Brian Cairns, Siddhant Gupta, Greg McFarquhar, and Joseph O'Brien
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 981–1011, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-981-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-981-2025, 2025
Short summary
Consideration of the cloud motion for aircraft-based stereographically derived cloud geometry and cloud top heights
Lea Volkmer, Tobias Kölling, Tobias Zinner, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6807–6817, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6807-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6807-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the characteristics of Fengyun-4A Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI) visible reflectance using the China Meteorological Administration Mesoscale (CMA-MESO) forecasts and its implications for data assimilation
Yongbo Zhou, Yubao Liu, Wei Han, Yuefei Zeng, Haofei Sun, Peilong Yu, and Lijian Zhu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6659–6675, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6659-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6659-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validating global horizontal irradiance retrievals from Meteosat SEVIRI at increased spatial resolution against a dense network of ground-based observations
Job I. Wiltink, Hartwig Deneke, Yves-Marie Saint-Drenan, Chiel C. van Heerwaarden, and Jan Fokke Meirink
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6003–6024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6003-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6003-2024, 2024
Short summary
Attribution of riming and aggregation processes by application of the vertical distribution of particle shape (VDPS) and spectral retrieval techniques to cloud radar observations
Audrey Teisseire, Anne-Claire Billault-Roux, Teresa Vogl, and Patric Seifert
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2711,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2711, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Agarwal, A., Meijer, V. R., Eastham, S. D., Speth, R. L., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Reanalysis-Driven Simulations May Overestimate Persistent Contrail Formation by 100 %–250 %, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 014045, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac38d9, 2022. a
Bakan, S., Betancor, M., Gayler, V., and Graßl, H.: Contrail Frequency over Europe from NOAA-satellite Images, Ann. Geophys., 12, 962–968, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-994-0962-y, 1994. a
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Webb, M. J., Bony, S., Chepfer, H., Dufresne, J.-L., Klein, S. A., Zhang, Y., Marchand, R., Haynes, J. M., Pincus, R., and John, V. O.: COSP: Satellite Simulation Software for Model Assessment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1023–1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1, 2011. a
Buras, R., Dowling, T., and Emde, C.: New Secondary-Scattering Correction in DISORT with Increased Efficiency for Forward Scattering, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 112, 2028–2034, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.03.019, 2011. a
Chevallier, R., Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Soler, M., and Delahaye, D.: Linear Contrails Detection, Tracking and Matching with Aircraft Using Geostationary Satellite and Air Traffic Data, Aerospace, 10, 578, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10070578, 2023. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
Contrails (clouds caused by planes) play a large role in the climate warming caused by aviation. Satellites are a good tool to validate modelled impact estimates. Many contrails are either too narrow or too disperse to detect. This work shows that only around half of contrails are observable but that the most climatically important are easier to detect. It supports the use of satellites for contrail observation but highlights the need for observability considerations for specific applications.
Share