Articles | Volume 9, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4459-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4459-2016
Research article
 | 
08 Sep 2016
Research article |  | 08 Sep 2016

Uncertainty budgets of major ozone absorption cross sections used in UV remote sensing applications

Mark Weber, Victor Gorshelev, and Anna Serdyuchenko

Related authors

Tropospheric ozone column dataset from OMPS-LP/OMPS-NM limb–nadir matching
Andrea Orfanoz-Cheuquelaf, Carlo Arosio, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Annette Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, John P. Burrows, Anne M. Thompson, Ryan M. Stauffer, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1791–1809, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved CCD tropospheric ozone from S5P TROPOMI satellite data using local cloud fields
Swathi Maratt Satheesan, Kai-Uwe Eichmann, John P. Burrows, Mark Weber, Ryan Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, and Debra Kollonige
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2825,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2825, 2024
Short summary
Relations between cyclones and ozone changes in the Arctic using data from satellite instruments and the MOSAiC ship campaign
Falco Monsees, Alexei Rozanov, John P. Burrows, Mark Weber, Annette Rinke, Ralf Jaiser, and Peter von der Gathen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3036,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3036, 2024
Short summary
Stability requirements of observation systems to detect long-term stratospheric ozone trends based upon Monte Carlo simulations
Mark Weber
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3070,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3070, 2024
Short summary
TOLNet validation of satellite ozone profiles in the troposphere: impact of retrieval wavelengths
Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-195,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-195, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Laboratory Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Application of fuzzy c-means clustering for analysis of chemical ionization mass spectra: insights into the gas phase chemistry of NO3-initiated oxidation of isoprene
Rongrong Wu, Sören R. Zorn, Sungah Kang, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr, Andreas Wahner, and Thomas F. Mentel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1811–1835, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1811-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1811-2024, 2024
Short summary
Wall loss of semi-volatile organic compounds in a Teflon bag chamber for the temperature range of 262–298 K: mechanistic insight on temperature dependence
Longkun He, Wenli Liu, Yatai Li, Jixuan Wang, Mikinori Kuwata, and Yingjun Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 755–764, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-755-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-755-2024, 2024
Short summary
Obtaining accurate non-methane hydrocarbon data for ambient air in urban areas: comparison of non-methane hydrocarbon data between indirect and direct methods
Song Gao, Yong Yang, Xiao Tong, Linyuan Zhang, Yusen Duan, Guigang Tang, Qiang Wang, Changqing Lin, Qingyan Fu, Lipeng Liu, and Lingning Meng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5709–5723, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5709-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5709-2023, 2023
Short summary
Reconstruction of high-frequency methane atmospheric concentration peaks from measurements using metal oxide low-cost sensors
Rodrigo Andres Rivera Martinez, Diego Santaren, Olivier Laurent, Gregoire Broquet, Ford Cropley, Cécile Mallet, Michel Ramonet, Adil Shah, Leonard Rivier, Caroline Bouchet, Catherine Juery, Olivier Duclaux, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2209–2235, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2209-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2209-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cavity ring-down spectroscopy of water vapor in the deep-blue region
Qing-Ying Yang, Eamon K. Conway, Hui Liang, Iouli E. Gordon, Yan Tan, and Shui-Ming Hu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4463–4472, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4463-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4463-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

ACSO: WMO/GAW-IO3C-IGACO-O3 Activity “Absorption Cross Sections of Ozone (ACSO)”, available at: http://igaco-o3.fmi.fi/ACSO/ (last access: November 2015), 2010.
Bass, A. M. and Paur, R. J.: The ultraviolet cross-sections of ozone: I. the measurements, in: Atmospheric Ozone, edited by: Zerefos, C. S., and Ghazi, A., Proc. Quadrennial Ozone Symposium, Halkidiki, Greece, 1984, Reidel, D., Dordrecht, 606–610, 1985.
Box, G. E. P. and Muller, M. E.: A note on the generation of random normal deviates, Ann. Math. Stat., 29, 610–611, https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706645, 1958.
Brion, J., Chakir, A., Daumont, D., Malicet, J., and Parisse, C.: High-resolution laboratory absorption cross section of O3. Temperature effect, Chem. Phys. Lett., 213, 610–612, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)89169-I, 1993.
Chehade, W., Gür, B., Spietz, P., Gorshelev, V., Serdyuchenko, A., Burrows, J. P., and Weber, M.: Temperature dependent ozone absorption cross section spectra measured with the GOME-2 FM3 spectrometer and first application in satellite retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1623–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1623-2013, 2013.
Download
Short summary
Ozone absorption cross sections measured in the laboratory using spectroscopic means can be a major source of uncertainty in atmospheric ozone retrievals. In this paper we assess the overall uncertainty in three published UV ozone cross-section datasets that are most popular in the remote sensing community. The overall uncertainties were estimated using Monte Carlo simulations. They are important for traceability of atmospheric ozone measuring instruments to common metrological standards.