Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4079-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4079-2017
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2017

Aerosol-type retrieval and uncertainty quantification from OMI data

Anu Kauppi, Pekka Kolmonen, Marko Laine, and Johanna Tamminen

Related authors

Bayesian uncertainty quantification in aerosol optical depth retrieval applied to TROPOMI measurements
Anu Kauppi, Antti Kukkurainen, Antti Lipponen, Marko Laine, Antti Arola, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, and Johanna Tamminen
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-328,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-328, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Overview of the O3M SAF GOME-2 operational atmospheric composition and UV radiation data products and data availability
S. Hassinen, D. Balis, H. Bauer, M. Begoin, A. Delcloo, K. Eleftheratos, S. Gimeno Garcia, J. Granville, M. Grossi, N. Hao, P. Hedelt, F. Hendrick, M. Hess, K.-P. Heue, J. Hovila, H. Jønch-Sørensen, N. Kalakoski, A. Kauppi, S. Kiemle, L. Kins, M. E. Koukouli, J. Kujanpää, J.-C. Lambert, R. Lang, C. Lerot, D. Loyola, M. Pedergnana, G. Pinardi, F. Romahn, M. van Roozendael, R. Lutz, I. De Smedt, P. Stammes, W. Steinbrecht, J. Tamminen, N. Theys, L. G. Tilstra, O. N. E. Tuinder, P. Valks, C. Zerefos, W. Zimmer, and I. Zyrichidou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 383–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-383-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-383-2016, 2016
Short summary
Comparison of GOME-2/Metop-A ozone profiles with GOMOS, OSIRIS and MLS measurements
A. Kauppi, O. N. E. Tuinder, S. Tukiainen, V. Sofieva, and J. Tamminen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 249–261, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-249-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-249-2016, 2016
Short summary
Quantification of uncertainty in aerosol optical thickness retrieval arising from aerosol microphysical model and other sources, applied to Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurements
A. Määttä, M. Laine, J. Tamminen, and J. P. Veefkind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1185–1199, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1185-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1185-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
ACDL/DQ-1 calibration algorithms – Part 1: Nighttime 532 nm polarization and the high-spectral-resolution channel
Fanqian Meng, Junwu Tang, Guangyao Dai, Wenrui Long, Kangwen Sun, Zhiyu Zhang, Xiaoquan Song, Jiqiao Liu, Weibiao Chen, and Songhua Wu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2021–2039, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2021-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2021-2025, 2025
Short summary
Aerosol composition retrieval from a combination of three different spaceborne instruments: information content analysis
Ulrike Stöffelmair, Thomas Popp, Marco Vountas, and Hartmut Bösch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2005–2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2005-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2005-2025, 2025
Short summary
Compact dual-wavelength depolarization lidar for aerosol characterization over the subtropical North Atlantic
Yenny González, María F. Sánchez-Barrero, Ioana Popovici, África Barreto, Stephane Victori, Ellsworth J. Welton, Rosa D. García, Pablo G. Sicilia, Fernando A. Almansa, Carlos Torres, and Philippe Goloub
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1885–1908, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1885-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1885-2025, 2025
Short summary
Towards gridded nighttime aerosol optical thickness retrievals using VIIRS day–night band observations over regions with artificial light sources
Jianglong Zhang, Jeffrey S. Reid, Blake T. Sorenson, Steven D. Miller, Miguel O. Román, Zhuosen Wang, Robert J. D. Spurr, Shawn Jaker, Thomas F. Eck, and Juli I. Rubin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1787–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1787-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1787-2025, 2025
Short summary
Multi-layer retrieval of aerosol optical depth in the troposphere using SEVIRI data: a case study of the European continent
Maryam Pashayi, Mehran Satari, and Mehdi Momeni Shahraki
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1415–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1415-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1415-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahn, C., Torres, O., and Bhartia, P. K.: Comparison of ozone monitoring instrument UV aerosol products with Aqua/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer observations in 2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D16S27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008832, 2008.
Ahn, C., Torres, O., and Jethva, H.: Assessment of OMI near-UV aerosol optical depth over land, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2457–2473, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020188, 2014.
Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R. J., Fisher, M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Mangold, A., Razinger, M., Simmons, A. J., and Suttie, M.: Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecast System: 2. Data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D13205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115, 2009.
Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S., Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.
Brynjarsdóttir, J. and O'Hagan, A.: Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy, Inverse problems, 30, 114007, https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007, 2014.
Download
Short summary
The paper focuses on the aerosol microphysical model selection and characterisation of uncertainty in the retrieved aerosol type and aerosol optical depth (AOD). The proposed method is based on Bayesian inference approach and can account for the model error and also include the model selection uncertainty in the total uncertainty budget. The method is applied to OMI measurements but is also applicable to other instruments. The retrieval was evaluated by comparison with ground-based measurements.
Share