Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1849-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1849-2022
Research article
 | 
28 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 28 Mar 2022

Optimized Umkehr profile algorithm for ozone trend analyses

Irina Petropavlovskikh, Koji Miyagawa, Audra McClure-Beegle, Bryan Johnson, Jeannette Wild, Susan Strahan, Krzysztof Wargan, Richard Querel, Lawrence Flynn, Eric Beach, Gerard Ancellet, and Sophie Godin-Beekmann

Related authors

Exploring ozone variability in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere using dynamical coordinates
Luis F. Millán, Peter Hoor, Michaela I. Hegglin, Gloria L. Manney, Harald Boenisch, Paul Jeffery, Daniel Kunkel, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Hao Ye, Thierry Leblanc, and Kaley Walker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-144,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-144, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Challenges of detecting free tropospheric ozone trends in a sparsely sampled environment
Kai-Lan Chang, Owen R. Cooper, Audrey Gaudel, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Peter Effertz, Gary Morris, and Brian C. McDonald
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2739,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2739, 2024
Short summary
Fingerprints of the COVID-19 economic downturn and recovery on ozone anomalies at high-elevation sites in North America and western Europe
Davide Putero, Paolo Cristofanelli, Kai-Lan Chang, Gaëlle Dufour, Gregory Beachley, Cédric Couret, Peter Effertz, Daniel A. Jaffe, Dagmar Kubistin, Jason Lynch, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Melissa Puchalski, Timothy Sharac, Barkley C. Sive, Martin Steinbacher, Carlos Torres, and Owen R. Cooper
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15693–15709, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023, 2023
Short summary
Intercomparison of long-term ground-based measurements of tropospheric and stratospheric ozone at Lauder, New Zealand (45S)
Robin Björklund, Corinne Vigouroux, Peter Effertz, Omaira Garcia, Alex Geddes, James Hannigan, Koji Miyagawa, Michael Kotkamp, Bavo Langerock, Gerald Nedoluha, Ivan Ortega, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Deniz Poyraz, Richard Querel, John Robinson, Hisako Shiona, Dan Smale, Penny Smale, Roeland Van Malderen, and Martine De Mazière
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2668,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2668, 2023
Short summary
Total ozone variability and trends over the South Pole during the wintertime
Vitali Fioletov, Xiaoyi Zhao, Ihab Abboud, Michael Brohart, Akira Ogyu, Reno Sit, Sum Chi Lee, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Koji Miyagawa, Bryan J. Johnson, Patrick Cullis, John Booth, Glen McConville, and C. Thomas McElroy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 12731–12751, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12731-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12731-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Greenhouse gas retrievals for the CO2M mission using the FOCAL method: first performance estimates
Stefan Noël, Michael Buchwitz, Michael Hilker, Maximilian Reuter, Michael Weimer, Heinrich Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, Hartmut Bösch, and Ruediger Lang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2317–2334, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2317-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantitative imaging of carbon dioxide plumes using a ground-based shortwave infrared spectral camera
Marvin Knapp, Ralph Kleinschek, Sanam N. Vardag, Felix Külheim, Helge Haveresch, Moritz Sindram, Tim Siegel, Bruno Burger, and André Butz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2257–2275, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2257-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2257-2024, 2024
Short summary
The transition to new ozone absorption cross sections for Dobson and Brewer total ozone measurements
Karl Voglmeier, Voltaire A. Velazco, Luca Egli, Julian Gröbner, Alberto Redondas, and Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2277–2294, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2277-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Advantages of assimilating multispectral satellite retrievals of atmospheric composition: a demonstration using MOPITT carbon monoxide products
Wenfu Tang, Benjamin Gaubert, Louisa Emmons, Daniel Ziskin, Debbie Mao, David Edwards, Avelino Arellano, Kevin Raeder, Jeffrey Anderson, and Helen Worden
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1941–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1941-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1941-2024, 2024
Short summary
An improved OMI ozone profile research product version 2.0 with collection 4 L1b data and algorithm updates
Juseon Bak, Xiong Liu, Kai Yang, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Ewan O'Sullivan, Kelly Chance, and Cheol-Hee Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1891–1911, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1891-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1891-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abalos, M., Polvani, L., Calvo, N., Kinnison, D., Ploeger, F., Randel, W.,and Solomon, S.: New insights on the impact of ozone-depleting substances on the Brewer-Dobson circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 2435–2451, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029301, 2019. 
Bai, K., Liu, C., Shi, R., and and Gao, W.: Comparison of Suomi-NPP OMPS total column ozone with Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers measurements, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 369–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0480-5, 2015. 
Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Staehelin, J., Davis, S. M., Froidevaux, L., and Peter, T.: Stratospheric ozone trends for 1985–2018: sensitivity to recent large variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12731–12748, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12731-2019, 2019. 
Ball, W. T., Chiodo, G., Abalos, M., Alsing, J., and Stenke, A.: Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020. 
Bass, A. M. and Paur, R. J.: The ultraviolet cross-sections of ozone: I. The measurements in Atmospheric ozone, edited by: Zerefos, C. S. and Ghazi, A., Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, 606–610, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5313-0_120, 1985. 
Download
Short summary
The Montreal Protocol and its amendments assure the recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer that protects the Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation. To monitor ozone recovery, multiple satellites and ground-based observational platforms collect ozone data. The changes in instruments can influence the continuation of the ozone data. We discuss a method to remove instrumental artifacts from ozone records to improve the internal consistency among multiple observational records.