Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1849–1870, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1849-2022

Special issue: Quadrennial Ozone Symposium 2016 – Status and trends...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1849–1870, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1849-2022
Research article
28 Mar 2022
Research article | 28 Mar 2022

Optimized Umkehr profile algorithm for ozone trend analyses

Irina Petropavlovskikh et al.

Related authors

Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021)
Noah Bernays, Daniel A. Jaffe, Irina Petropavlovskikh, and Peter Effertz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3189–3192, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022, 2022
Short summary
DLM estimates of long-term Ozone trends from Dobson and Brewer Umkehr profiles
Eliane Maillard Barras, Alexander Haefele, René Stübi, Achille Jouberton, Herbert Schill, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Koji Miyagawa, Martin Stanek, and Lucien Froidevaux
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-344,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-344, 2022
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Analyzing ozone variations and uncertainties at high latitudes during sudden stratospheric warming events using MERRA-2
Shima Bahramvash Shams, Von P. Walden, James W. Hannigan, William J. Randel, Irina V. Petropavlovskikh, Amy H. Butler, and Alvaro de la Cámara
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5435–5458, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ozone and DNA active UV radiation changes for the near global mean and at high latitudes due to enhanced greenhouse gas concentrations
Kostas Eleftheratos, John Kapsomenakis, Ilias Fountoulakis, Christos S. Zerefos, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Alkiviadis F. Bais, Germar Bernhard, Dimitra Kouklaki, Kleareti Tourpali, Scott Stierle, J. Ben Liley, Colette Brogniez, Frédérique Auriol, Henri Diémoz, Stana Simic, and Irina Petropavlovskikh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-87,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-87, 2022
Short summary
Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60° S–60° N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model
Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Niramson Azouz, Viktoria Sofieva, Daan Hubert, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Peter Effertz, Gérard Ancellet, Douglas Degenstein, Daniel Zawada, Lucien Froidevaux, Stacey Frith, Jeannette Wild, Sean Davis, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, Thierry Leblanc, Richard Querel, Kleareti Tourpali, Robert Damadeo, Eliane Maillard-Barras, René Stübi, Corinne Vigouroux, Carlo Arosio, Gerald Nedoluha, Ian Boyd, and Roeland van Malderen
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-137,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-137, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
An optimal estimation-based retrieval of upper atmospheric oxygen airglow and temperature from SCIAMACHY limb observations
Kang Sun, Mahdi Yousefi, Christopher Chan Miller, Kelly Chance, Gonzalo González Abad, Iouli E. Gordon, Xiong Liu, Ewan O'Sullivan, Christopher E. Sioris, and Steven C. Wofsy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3721–3745, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3721-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) collection 4: establishing a 17-year-long series of detrended level-1b data
Quintus Kleipool, Nico Rozemeijer, Mirna van Hoek, Jonatan Leloux, Erwin Loots, Antje Ludewig, Emiel van der Plas, Daley Adrichem, Raoul Harel, Simon Spronk, Mark ter Linden, Glen Jaross, David Haffner, Pepijn Veefkind, and Pieternel F. Levelt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3527–3553, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3527-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3527-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impact of 3D cloud structures on the atmospheric trace gas products from UV–Vis sounders – Part 3: Bias estimate using synthetic and observational data
Arve Kylling, Claudia Emde, Huan Yu, Michel van Roozendael, Kerstin Stebel, Ben Veihelmann, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3481–3495, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3481-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3481-2022, 2022
Short summary
Retrieval of greenhouse gases from GOSAT and GOSAT-2 using the FOCAL algorithm
Stefan Noël, Maximilian Reuter, Michael Buchwitz, Jakob Borchardt, Michael Hilker, Oliver Schneising, Heinrich Bovensmann, John P. Burrows, Antonio Di Noia, Robert J. Parker, Hiroshi Suto, Yukio Yoshida, Matthias Buschmann, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Dietrich G. Feist, David W. T. Griffith, Frank Hase, Rigel Kivi, Cheng Liu, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Young-Suk Oh, Hirofumi Ohyama, Christof Petri, David F. Pollard, Markus Rettinger, Coleen Roehl, Constantina Rousogenous, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Kei Shiomi, Kimberly Strong, Ralf Sussmann, Yao Té, Voltaire A. Velazco, Mihalis Vrekoussis, and Thorsten Warneke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3401–3437, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3401-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3401-2022, 2022
Short summary
Synergy of Using Nadir and Limb Instruments for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring (SUNLIT)
Viktoria F. Sofieva, Risto Hänninen, Mikhail Sofiev, Monika Szeląg, Hei Shing Lee, Johanna Tamminen, and Christian Retscher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3193–3212, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3193-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3193-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abalos, M., Polvani, L., Calvo, N., Kinnison, D., Ploeger, F., Randel, W.,and Solomon, S.: New insights on the impact of ozone-depleting substances on the Brewer-Dobson circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 2435–2451, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029301, 2019. 
Bai, K., Liu, C., Shi, R., and and Gao, W.: Comparison of Suomi-NPP OMPS total column ozone with Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers measurements, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 369–380, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0480-5, 2015. 
Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Staehelin, J., Davis, S. M., Froidevaux, L., and Peter, T.: Stratospheric ozone trends for 1985–2018: sensitivity to recent large variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12731–12748, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12731-2019, 2019. 
Ball, W. T., Chiodo, G., Abalos, M., Alsing, J., and Stenke, A.: Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020. 
Bass, A. M. and Paur, R. J.: The ultraviolet cross-sections of ozone: I. The measurements in Atmospheric ozone, edited by: Zerefos, C. S. and Ghazi, A., Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, 606–610, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5313-0_120, 1985. 
Download
Short summary
The Montreal Protocol and its amendments assure the recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer that protects the Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation. To monitor ozone recovery, multiple satellites and ground-based observational platforms collect ozone data. The changes in instruments can influence the continuation of the ozone data. We discuss a method to remove instrumental artifacts from ozone records to improve the internal consistency among multiple observational records.