Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018
Research article
 | 
26 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 26 Jun 2018

Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application

Alessandro Bigi, Michael Mueller, Stuart K. Grange, Grazia Ghermandi, and Christoph Hueglin

Related authors

Measurement report: Source attribution and estimation of black carbon levels in an urban hotspot of the central Po Valley – an integrated approach combining high-resolution dispersion modelling and micro-aethalometers
Giorgio Veratti, Alessandro Bigi, Michele Stortini, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10475–10512, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10475-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10475-2024, 2024
Short summary
Description and validation of Vehicular Emissions from Road Traffic (VERT) 1.0, an R-based framework for estimating road transport emissions from traffic flows
Giorgio Veratti, Alessandro Bigi, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6465–6487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6465-2024, 2024
Short summary
Transferability of machine-learning-based global calibration models for NO2 and NO low-cost sensors
Ayah Abu-Hani, Jia Chen, Vigneshkumar Balamurugan, Adrian Wenzel, and Alessandro Bigi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3917–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3917-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3917-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new software toolkit for optical apportionment of carbonaceous aerosol
Tommaso Isolabella, Vera Bernardoni, Alessandro Bigi, Marco Brunoldi, Federico Mazzei, Franco Parodi, Paolo Prati, Virginia Vernocchi, and Dario Massabò
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1363–1373, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1363-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1363-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerosol absorption using in situ filter-based photometers and ground-based sun photometry in the Po Valley urban atmosphere
Alessandro Bigi, Giorgio Veratti, Elisabeth Andrews, Martine Collaud Coen, Lorenzo Guerrieri, Vera Bernardoni, Dario Massabò, Luca Ferrero, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14841–14869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14841-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14841-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Multiphysical description of atmospheric pressure interface chemical ionisation in MION2 and Eisele type inlets
Henning Finkenzeller, Jyri Mikkilä, Cecilia Righi, Paxton Juuti, Mikko Sipilä, Matti Rissanen, Douglas Worsnop, Aleksei Shcherbinin, Nina Sarnela, and Juha Kangasluoma
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5989–6001, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5989-2024, 2024
Short summary
A portable nitrogen dioxide instrument using cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy
Steven A. Bailey, Reem A. Hannun, Andrew K. Swanson, and Thomas F. Hanisco
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5903–5910, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and deployment of a mid-cost CO2 sensor monitoring network to support atmospheric inverse modeling for quantifying urban CO2 emissions in Paris
Jinghui Lian, Olivier Laurent, Mali Chariot, Luc Lienhardt, Michel Ramonet, Hervé Utard, Thomas Lauvaux, François-Marie Bréon, Grégoire Broquet, Karina Cucchi, Laurent Millair, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5821–5839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5821-2024, 2024
Short summary
UAV-based in situ measurements of CO2 and CH4 fluxes over complex natural ecosystems
Abdullah Bolek, Martin Heimann, and Mathias Göckede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5619–5636, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5619-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation
Jonathan F. Dooley, Kenneth Minschwaner, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sahar H. El Abbadi, Evan D. Sherwin, Aaron G. Meyer, Emily Follansbee, and James E. Lee
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5091–5111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alphasense Ltd: Alphasense 4-Electrode Individual Sensor Board (ISB), Great Notley, UK, 085-2217 edn., 2014.
Alphasense Ltd: Environmental changes: temperature, pressure, humidity, Tech. Rep. AAN 110, Great Notley, UK, available at: http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/AAN_110.pdf, last access: 20 June 2018, 2017.
Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., and Wager, S.: Generalized Random Forests, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.01271v3.pdf (last access: 25 June 2018), 2017.
Baron, R. and Saffell, J.: Amperometric Gas Sensors as a Low Cost Emerging Technology Platform for Air Quality Monitoring Applications: A Review, ACS Sensors, 2, 1553–1566, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00620, 2017.
Download
Short summary
Low cost sensors for monitoring atmospheric pollution are growing in popularity worldwide. Nonetheless, the expectations from these devices were seldom met, thus urging for more research. This study focuses on sensor performance within the realistic framework of an initial calibration next to a reference instrument and the subsequent distant deployment. Within this framework, we assessed the uncertainty of these sensors and their suitability to map intra-urban gradients of NO/NO2.