Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3319-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3319-2020
Research article
 | 
22 Jun 2020
Research article |  | 22 Jun 2020

Continuous methane concentration measurements at the Greenland ice sheet–atmosphere interface using a low-cost, low-power metal oxide sensor system

Christian Juncher Jørgensen, Jacob Mønster, Karsten Fuglsang, and Jesper Riis Christiansen

Related authors

Lability classification of soil organic matter in the northern permafrost region
Peter Kuhry, Jiří Bárta, Daan Blok, Bo Elberling, Samuel Faucherre, Gustaf Hugelius, Christian J. Jørgensen, Andreas Richter, Hana Šantrůčková, and Niels Weiss
Biogeosciences, 17, 361–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-361-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-361-2020, 2020

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Evaluation of optimized flux chamber design for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery
Johanna Pedersen, Sasha D. Hafner, Andreas Pacholski, Valthor I. Karlsson, Li Rong, Rodrigo Labouriau, and Jesper N. Kamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4493–4505, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors
Niklas Karbach, Lisa Höhler, Peter Hoor, Heiko Bozem, Nicole Bobrowski, and Thorsten Hoffmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4081–4086, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere
Livia Lown, Sarrah M. Dunham-Cheatham, Seth N. Lyman, and Mae S. Gustin
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-50,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-50, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Pico-Light H2O: intercomparison of in situ water vapour measurements during the AsA 2022 campaign
Mélanie Ghysels, Georges Durry, Nadir Amarouche, Dale Hurst, Emrys Hall, Kensy Xiong, Jean-Charles Dupont, Jean-Christophe Samake, Fabien Frérot, Raghed Bejjani, and Emmanuel D. Riviere
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3495–3513, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mobile air quality monitoring and comparison to fixed monitoring sites for instrument performance assessment
Andrew R. Whitehill, Melissa Lunden, Brian LaFranchi, Surender Kaushik, and Paul A. Solomon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2991–3009, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bastviken, D., Nygren, J., Schenk, J., Parellada Massana, R., and Duc, N. T.: Technical note: Facilitating the use of low-cost methane (CH4) sensors in flux chambers – calibration, data processing, and an open source make-it-yourself logger, Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-499, in review, 2020. 
Brannon, E. Q., Moseman-valtierra, S. M., Rella, C. W., Martin, R. M., Chen, X., and Tang, J.: Evaluation of laser-based spectrometers for greenhouse gas flux measurements in coastal marshes, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 14, 466–476, https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10105, 2016. 
Callaghan, T. V., Johansson, M., Key, J., Prowse, T., Ananicheva, M., and Klepikov, A.: Feedbacks and Interactions: From the Arctic Cryosphere to the Climate System, AMBIO, 40, 75–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0215-8, 2011. 
Christiansen, J. R. and Jørgensen, C. J.: First observation of direct methane emission to the atmosphere from the subglacial domain of the Greenland Ice Sheet, Scientific Reports, 8, 16623, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35054-7, 2018. 
Emmerton, C. A., St. Louis, V. L., Lehnherr, I., Humphreys, E. R., Rydz, E., and Kosolofski, H. R.: The net exchange of methane with high Arctic landscapes during the summer growing season, Biogeosciences, 11, 3095–3106, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3095-2014, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Recent discoveries have shown large emissions of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere from meltwater at the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS). Low-cost and low-power gas sensor technology offers great potential to supplement CH4 measurements using very expensive reference analyzers under harsh and remote conditions. In this paper we evaluate the in situ performance at the GrIS of a low-cost CH4 sensor to a state-of-the-art analyzer and find very excellent agreement between the two methods.