Articles | Volume 13, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6915-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6915-2020
Research article
 | 
18 Dec 2020
Research article |  | 18 Dec 2020

Ozone deposition to a coastal sea: comparison of eddy covariance observations with reactive air–sea exchange models

David C. Loades, Mingxi Yang, Thomas G. Bell, Adam R. Vaughan, Ryan J. Pound, Stefan Metzger, James D. Lee, and Lucy J. Carpenter

Related authors

The ASK-16 Motorized Glider: An Airborne Eddy Covariance Platform to measure Turbulence, Energy and Matter Fluxes
Inge Wiekenkamp, Anna Katharina Lehmann, Alexander Bütow, Jörg Hartmann, Stefan Metzger, Thomas Ruhtz, Christian Wille, Mathias Zöllner, and Torsten Sachs
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1586,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1586, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary
Negligible temperature dependence of the ozone–iodide reaction and implications for oceanic emissions of iodine
Lucy V. Brown, Ryan J. Pound, Lyndsay S. Ives, Matthew R. Jones, Stephen J. Andrews, and Lucy J. Carpenter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3905–3923, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3905-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3905-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) climatologies, fluxes and trends – Part A: Differences between seawater DMS estimations
Sankirna D. Joge, Anoop Sharad Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, Christa Marandino, Martí Galí, Thomas Bell, and Rafel Simo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-173,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-173, 2024
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) climatologies, fluxes, and trends – Part B: Sea-air fluxes
Sankirna D. Joge, Anoop Sharad Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, Christa Marandino, Marti Gali, Thomas Bell, Mingxi Yang, and Rafel Simo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-175,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-175, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
Toward on-demand measurements of greenhouse gas emissions using an uncrewed aircraft AirCore system
Zihan Zhu, Javier González-Rocha, Yifan Ding, Isis Frausto-Vicencio, Sajjan Heerah, Akula Venkatram, Manvendra Dubey, Don Collins, and Francesca M. Hopkins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3883–3895, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3883-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3883-2024, 2024
Short summary
Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study
Sebastian Diez, Stuart Lacy, Hugh Coe, Josefina Urquiza, Max Priestman, Michael Flynn, Nicholas Marsden, Nicholas A. Martin, Stefan Gillott, Thomas Bannan, and Pete M. Edwards
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3809–3827, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024, 2024
Short summary
In-flight characterization of a compact airborne quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer
Linda Ort, Lenard Lukas Röder, Uwe Parchatka, Rainer Königstedt, Daniel Crowley, Frank Kunz, Ralf Wittkowski, Jos Lelieveld, and Horst Fischer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3553–3565, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3553-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3553-2024, 2024
Short summary
Full characterization and calibration of a transfer standard monitor for atmospheric radon measurements
Roger Curcoll, Claudia Grossi, Stefan Röttger, and Arturo Vargas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3047–3065, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3047-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3047-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observing low-altitude features in ozone concentrations in a shoreline environment via uncrewed aerial systems
Josie K. Radtke, Benjamin N. Kies, Whitney A. Mottishaw, Sydney M. Zeuli, Aidan T. H. Voon, Kelly L. Koerber, Grant W. Petty, Michael P. Vermeuel, Timothy H. Bertram, Ankur R. Desai, Joseph P. Hupy, R. Bradley Pierce, Timothy J. Wagner, and Patricia A. Cleary
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2833–2847, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2833-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2833-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aldaz, L.: Flux Measurements of Atmospheric Ozone Over Land Water, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 6943–6946, 1969. 
Amiro, B. D.: Footprint climatologies for evapotranspiration in a boreal catchment, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 90, 195–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00096-8, 1998. 
Aubinet, M.: Eddy Covariance CO2 Flux Measurements in Nocturnal Conditions: an Analysis of the Problem, Ecol. Appl., 18, 1368–1378, 2008. 
Bariteau, L., Helmig, D., Fairall, C. W., Hare, J. E., Hueber, J., and Lang, E. K.: Determination of oceanic ozone deposition by ship-borne eddy covariance flux measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 441–455, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-441-2010, 2010. 
Barr, A. G., Richardson, A. D., Hollinger, D. Y., Papale, D., Arain, M. A., Black, T. A., Bohrer, G., Dragoni, D., Fischer, M. L., Gu, L., Law, B. E., Margolis, H. A., Mccaughey, J. H., Munger, J. W., Oechel, W., and Schaeffer, K.: Use of change-point detection for friction-velocity threshold evaluation in eddy-covariance studies, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 171–172, 31–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.023, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
The loss of ozone to the sea surface was measured from the south coast of the UK and was found to be more rapid than previous observations over the open ocean. This is likely a consequence of different chemistry and biology in coastal environments. Strong winds appeared to speed up the loss of ozone. A better understanding of what influences ozone loss over the sea will lead to better model estimates of total ozone in the troposphere.