Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1055-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1055-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
02 Mar 2022
Research article |
| 02 Mar 2022
| 02 Mar 2022
Comparison of scattering ratio profiles retrieved from ALADIN/Aeolus and CALIOP/CALIPSO observations and preliminary estimates of cloud fraction profiles
Artem G. Feofilov
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS,
École Polytechnique, Paris, France
Hélène Chepfer
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS,
École Polytechnique, Paris, France
Vincent Noël
Laboratoire d'Aérologie, CNRS/UPS, Observatoire
Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France
Rodrigo Guzman
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS,
École Polytechnique, Paris, France
Cyprien Gindre
LMD/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS,
École Polytechnique, Paris, France
Po-Lun Ma
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
Marjolaine Chiriaco
LATMOS/IPSL, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines,
Guyancourt, France
Related authors
Zacharie Titus, Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Artem Feofilov, and Marie-Laure Roussel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 15017–15036, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15017-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15017-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we use satellite observations to study the relationships between profiles of clouds and profiles of wind from June to October 2020 around India. We show that the wind can be modified by 3 m s-1 because of the presence of deep convective clouds that spread out between 14 and 17 km of altitude. We also found that cirrus clouds between 14 and 17 km are more frequent over the Arabian Sea because of fast westward winds.
Artem G. Feofilov, Arezki Haddouche, Hélène Chepfer, Sergey Khaykin, Florian Lapouge, Patricia Delville, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Martial Haeffelin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Cheikh Dione, and Christophe Pietras
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6375, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6375, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
Do a satellite and a ground-based laser see a cloud the same way? Yes, but only under specific conditions. Seen from above and from below, light is weakened differently, so thick clouds look different in the backscatter even with perfect instruments. Using simulations and real measurements, we show which clouds can be compared. As the instruments are rarely at the same spot, we pair observations by the similarity of their vertical shapes, not by distance. Our rules help check satellite data.
Océane Soares, Sergey Khaykin, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Artem Feofilov, Tetsu Sakai, Yoshita Jin, Isamu Morino, Ben Liley, and Richard Querel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5639, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Volcanic eruptions and extreme wildfires can send particles high into the atmosphere, where they can remain for months or even years. Using nearly two decades of satellite observations together with measurements from the ground, we compare major events and show that their impacts can last for very different lengths of time. Our results help explain what controls how long these particles remain in the atmosphere.
Sergey Khaykin, Michaël Sicard, Thierry Leblanc, Tetsu Sakai, Nickolay Balugin, Gwenaël Berthet, Stëphane Chevrier, Fernando Chouza, Artem Feofilov, Dominique Gantois, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Arezki Haddouche, Yoshitaka Jin, Isamu Morino, Nicolas Kadygrov, Thomas Lecas, Ben Liley, Richard Querel, Ghasssan Taha, and Vladimir Yushkov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 607–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-607-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-607-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In April 2024, the Ruang volcano in Indonesia sent large amounts of gas and particles high into the atmosphere, which then spread worldwide. Using the new European EarthCARE satellite and its advanced laser instrument ATLID (Atmospheric LIDar), together with ground and balloon observations, we tracked how these particles doubled levels in the tropics and spread into both hemispheres. The study shows ATLID’s power to reveal how eruptions can affect climate, clouds, and ozone for more than a year.
Zacharie Titus, Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Artem G. Feofilov, Marie-Laure Roussel, Benjamin Witschas, and Sophie Bastin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 443–475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-443-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-443-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aeolus spaceborne Doppler Wind Lidar observes perfectly co-located vertical profiles of clouds and vertical profiles of horizontal wind that can be used to study cloud-wind interactions. At regional scale, we show that over the Indian Ocean, high cloud fractions increase when the Tropical Easterly Jet is active. At a smaller scale, we observe for the first time from space differences in the wind profiles within the cloud and its surrounding clear sky, that can be imputed to convective motions.
Alexander Kutepov and Artem Feofilov
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5331–5347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Infrared CO2 cooling of the middle and upper atmosphere is increasing. We developed a new routine for very fast and accurate calculations of this cooling in general circulation models. The new algorithm accounts for non-local thermodynamic equilibrium and is about 1000 times faster than the standard matrix algorithms. It is based on advanced techniques for non-equilibrium emission calculations in stellar atmospheres, which so far have not been used in Earth’s and planetary atmospheres.
Artem G. Feofilov, Hélène Chepfer, Vincent Noël, and Frederic Szczap
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3363–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3363-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3363-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The response of clouds to human-induced climate warming remains the largest source of uncertainty in model predictions of climate. We consider cloud retrievals from spaceborne observations, the existing CALIOP lidar and future ATLID lidar; show how they compare for the same scenes; and discuss the advantage of adding a new lidar for detecting cloud changes in the long run. We show that ATLID's advanced technology should allow for better detecting thinner clouds during daytime than before.
Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Po-Lun Ma, Johannes Quaas, David M. Winker, Artem Feofilov, and Nick Schutgens
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1359–1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol has a large impact on climate. Using a lidar aerosol simulator ensures consistent comparisons between modeled and observed aerosol. We present a lidar aerosol simulator that applies a cloud masking and an aerosol detection threshold. We estimate the lidar signals that would be observed at 532 nm by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization overflying the atmosphere predicted by a climate model. Our comparison at the seasonal timescale shows a discrepancy in the Southern Ocean.
Assia Arouf, Hélène Chepfer, Thibault Vaillant de Guélis, Marjolaine Chiriaco, Matthew D. Shupe, Rodrigo Guzman, Artem Feofilov, Patrick Raberanto, Tristan S. L'Ecuyer, Seiji Kato, and Michael R. Gallagher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3893–3923, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3893-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3893-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We proposed new estimates of the surface longwave (LW) cloud radiative effect (CRE) derived from observations collected by a space-based lidar on board the CALIPSO satellite and radiative transfer computations. Our estimate appropriately captures the surface LW CRE annual variability over bright polar surfaces, and it provides a dataset more than 13 years long.
Artem G. Feofilov, Arezki Haddouche, Hélène Chepfer, Sergey Khaykin, Florian Lapouge, Patricia Delville, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Martial Haeffelin, Jean-Charles Dupont, Cheikh Dione, and Christophe Pietras
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6375, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6375, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
Do a satellite and a ground-based laser see a cloud the same way? Yes, but only under specific conditions. Seen from above and from below, light is weakened differently, so thick clouds look different in the backscatter even with perfect instruments. Using simulations and real measurements, we show which clouds can be compared. As the instruments are rarely at the same spot, we pair observations by the similarity of their vertical shapes, not by distance. Our rules help check satellite data.
Zacharie Titus, Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Artem Feofilov, and Marie-Laure Roussel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 15017–15036, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15017-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15017-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we use satellite observations to study the relationships between profiles of clouds and profiles of wind from June to October 2020 around India. We show that the wind can be modified by 3 m s-1 because of the presence of deep convective clouds that spread out between 14 and 17 km of altitude. We also found that cirrus clouds between 14 and 17 km are more frequent over the Arabian Sea because of fast westward winds.
Océane Soares, Sergey Khaykin, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Artem Feofilov, Tetsu Sakai, Yoshita Jin, Isamu Morino, Ben Liley, and Richard Querel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5639, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5639, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Volcanic eruptions and extreme wildfires can send particles high into the atmosphere, where they can remain for months or even years. Using nearly two decades of satellite observations together with measurements from the ground, we compare major events and show that their impacts can last for very different lengths of time. Our results help explain what controls how long these particles remain in the atmosphere.
Vincent Noel, Hélène Chepfer, Christelle Barthe, and John Yorks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 5603–5615, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5603-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5603-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The shape of crystals in ice clouds drives their impact on the earth energy balance. These shapes are very variable and hard to categorize. In this paper, we use a recently developed method to classify clouds in categories of crystal shape. We apply this method to 33 months of measurements from a lidar in space. We discuss how the importance of shape categories changes with the time of the day. These results could be useful for people who try to simulate clouds in atmospheric models.
Jean Lac, Hélène Chepfer, Matthew D. Shupe, and Hannes Griesche
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4189–4213, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4189-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4189-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite observations show that Arctic spring experiences a rapid increase in liquid-containing clouds over sea ice. Our study shows that this transition is mostly driven by warmer temperatures in early spring than in late spring, favoring more liquid clouds formation, rather than a limited moisture source in early spring. It suggests that, in the future, this transition is likely to occur earlier in spring considering the rapid Arctic warming.
Jerome D. Fast, Balwinder Singh, Oscar Diaz-Ibarra, Jeff Johnson, Chandru Dhandapani, Brian Gaudet, Taufiq Hassan, Meng Huang, Jaelyn Litzinger, James Overfelt, Kyle Pressel, Michael Schmidt, Shuaiqi Tang, Adam C. Varble, Hui Wan, Mingxuan Wu, Kai Zhang, and Po-Lun Ma
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1538, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1538, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We ported a prognostic representation of aerosols to C++ and integrated it into an Earth system model that runs on powerful GPU supercomputers. The code conversion approach keeps the same detailed physics as the Fortran version, was carefully tested, and results show that new code produces aerosol simulations consistent with real‑world data over the central U.S. in spring 2016. Future work will optimize the code for GPUs so to reduce the overall computational time.
Johannes Mülmenstädt and Po-Lun Ma
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-748, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-748, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols emitted by human activities change the planetary energy budget by, among other mechanisms, changing how much liquid water is contained in clouds and thus their reflectance. Different lines of evidence (observations and models) disagree on the sign of the liquid water change even though they agree on the sign of the correlation between aerosols and liquid water in present-day internal variability. We show one way that observations can constrain models to resolve this disagreement.
Sergey Khaykin, Michaël Sicard, Thierry Leblanc, Tetsu Sakai, Nickolay Balugin, Gwenaël Berthet, Stëphane Chevrier, Fernando Chouza, Artem Feofilov, Dominique Gantois, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Arezki Haddouche, Yoshitaka Jin, Isamu Morino, Nicolas Kadygrov, Thomas Lecas, Ben Liley, Richard Querel, Ghasssan Taha, and Vladimir Yushkov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 607–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-607-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-607-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
In April 2024, the Ruang volcano in Indonesia sent large amounts of gas and particles high into the atmosphere, which then spread worldwide. Using the new European EarthCARE satellite and its advanced laser instrument ATLID (Atmospheric LIDar), together with ground and balloon observations, we tracked how these particles doubled levels in the tropics and spread into both hemispheres. The study shows ATLID’s power to reveal how eruptions can affect climate, clouds, and ozone for more than a year.
Zacharie Titus, Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Artem G. Feofilov, Marie-Laure Roussel, Benjamin Witschas, and Sophie Bastin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 443–475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-443-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-443-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aeolus spaceborne Doppler Wind Lidar observes perfectly co-located vertical profiles of clouds and vertical profiles of horizontal wind that can be used to study cloud-wind interactions. At regional scale, we show that over the Indian Ocean, high cloud fractions increase when the Tropical Easterly Jet is active. At a smaller scale, we observe for the first time from space differences in the wind profiles within the cloud and its surrounding clear sky, that can be imputed to convective motions.
Marie-Laure Roussel, Hélène Chepfer, Zacharie Titus, and Marine Bonazzola
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 117–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-117-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-117-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds are crucial for understanding and predicting climate, yet their processes remain uncertain in global models. We reproduced detailed observations from a lidar and a wind-lidar using an advanced instrument simulator to evaluate how well the model represents clouds. A dedicated module was developed for the wind-lidar. Both instruments reveal comparable cloud biases, confirming its value for improving model evaluation and enabling consistent multi-decade assessments with more recent sensors.
Matthew W. Christensen, Andrew Geiss, Adam C. Varble, and Po-Lun Ma
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 59–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-59-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-59-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We used satellite data and machine learning to better understand how tiny particles in the atmosphere affect clouds and their brightness. At higher spatial resolution, we discovered a new “M”-shaped pattern in the relationship between cloud water and droplet concentration unlike the inverted-V shape observed at coarsely gridded scales. Cloud water increases more with droplet concentration when rain is present. These findings support the development of next-generation atmospheric models.
Naser Mahfouz, Hassan Beydoun, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Noel Keen, Adam C. Varble, Luca Bertagna, Peter Bogenschutz, Andrew Bradley, Matthew W. Christensen, T. Conrad Clevenger, Aaron Donahue, Jerome Fast, James Foucar, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Oksana Guba, Walter Hannah, Benjamin Hillman, Robert Jacob, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Yun Qian, Balwinder Singh, Christopher Terai, Hailong Wang, Mingxuan Wu, Kai Zhang, Andrew Gettelman, Mark Taylor, L. Ruby Leung, Peter Caldwell, and Susannah Burrows
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15105–15120, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15105-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15105-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study assesses the aerosol effective radiative forcing in a global cloud-resolving atmosphere model at ultra-high resolution. We demonstrate that global aerosol forcing signal can be robustly reproduced across resolutions when aerosol activation processes are carefully parameterized. Further, we argue that simplified prescribed aerosol schemes will open the door for further process/mechanism studies under controlled conditions.
Maurin Zouzoua, Sophie Bastin, Fabienne Lohou, Marie Lothon, Marjolaine Chiriaco, Mathilde Jome, Cécile Mallet, Laurent Barthes, and Guylaine Canut
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3211–3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3211-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3211-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposes using a statistical model to freeze errors due to differences in environmental forcing when evaluating the surface turbulent heat fluxes from numerical simulations with observations. The statistical model is first built with observations and then applied to the simulated environment to generate possibly observed fluxes. This novel method provides insight into differently evaluating the numerical formulation of turbulent heat fluxes with a long period of observational data.
Andrew Geiss and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1809–1827, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1809-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Particles in the Earth's atmosphere strongly impact the planet's energy budget, and atmosphere simulations require accurate representation of their interaction with light. This work introduces two approaches to represent light scattering by small particles. The first is a scattering simulator based on Mie theory implemented in Python. The second is a neural network emulator that is more accurate than existing methods and is fast enough to be used in climate and weather simulations.
Katherine M. Smith, Alice M. Barthel, LeAnn M. Conlon, Luke P. Van Roekel, Anthony Bartoletti, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Chengzhu Zhang, Carolyn Branecky Begeman, James J. Benedict, Gautam Bisht, Yan Feng, Walter Hannah, Bryce E. Harrop, Nicole Jeffery, Wuyin Lin, Po-Lun Ma, Mathew E. Maltrud, Mark R. Petersen, Balwinder Singh, Qi Tang, Teklu Tesfa, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Shaocheng Xie, Xue Zheng, Karthik Balaguru, Oluwayemi Garuba, Peter Gleckler, Aixue Hu, Jiwoo Lee, Ben Moore-Maley, and Ana C. Ordoñez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1613–1633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Version 2.1 of the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) adds the Fox-Kemper et al. (2011) mixed-layer eddy parameterization, which restratifies the ocean surface layer through an overturning streamfunction. Results include surface layer bias reduction in temperature, salinity, and sea ice extent in the North Atlantic; a small strengthening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation; and improvements to many atmospheric climatological variables.
Brandon M. Duran, Casey J. Wall, Nicholas J. Lutsko, Takuro Michibata, Po-Lun Ma, Yi Qin, Margaret L. Duffy, Brian Medeiros, and Matvey Debolskiy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2123–2146, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2123-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2123-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use satellite simulator data generated by global climate models to investigate how aerosol particles impact the radiative properties of liquid clouds. Specifically, we quantify the radiative perturbations arising from aerosol-driven changes in the number density of cloud droplets, the vertically integrated cloud water mass, and the cloud amount. Our results show that, in models, aerosol effects on the number density of cloud droplets contribute the most to anthropogenic climate forcing.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Naser Mahfouz, Susanne E. Bauer, Susannah M. Burrows, Matthew W. Christensen, Sudhakar Dipu, Andrew Gettelman, L. Ruby Leung, Florian Tornow, Johannes Quaas, Adam C. Varble, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, and Youtong Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13633–13652, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stratocumulus clouds play a large role in Earth's climate by reflecting incoming solar energy back to space. Turbulence at stratocumulus cloud top mixes in dry, warm air, which can lead to cloud dissipation. This process is challenging for coarse-resolution global models to represent. We show that global models nevertheless agree well with our process understanding. Global models also think the process is less important for the climate than other lines of evidence have led us to conclude.
Alexander Kutepov and Artem Feofilov
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5331–5347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Infrared CO2 cooling of the middle and upper atmosphere is increasing. We developed a new routine for very fast and accurate calculations of this cooling in general circulation models. The new algorithm accounts for non-local thermodynamic equilibrium and is about 1000 times faster than the standard matrix algorithms. It is based on advanced techniques for non-equilibrium emission calculations in stellar atmospheres, which so far have not been used in Earth’s and planetary atmospheres.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Edward Gryspeerdt, Sudhakar Dipu, Johannes Quaas, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Florian Tornow, Susanne E. Bauer, Andrew Gettelman, Yi Ming, Youtong Zheng, Po-Lun Ma, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Matthew W. Christensen, Adam C. Varble, L. Ruby Leung, Xiaohong Liu, David Neubauer, Daniel G. Partridge, Philip Stier, and Toshihiko Takemura
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7331–7345, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Human activities release copious amounts of small particles called aerosols into the atmosphere. These particles change how much sunlight clouds reflect to space, an important human perturbation of the climate, whose magnitude is highly uncertain. We found that the latest climate models show a negative correlation but a positive causal relationship between aerosols and cloud water. This means we need to be very careful when we interpret observational studies that can only see correlation.
Mathilde Leroux and Vincent Noel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6433–6454, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6433-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the long-term changes in the polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) season from 1980 to 2021 above Antarctica. We analyzed CALIOP observations from 2006 to 2020 to build a statistical temperature-based model. We applied our model to gridded reanalysis temperatures, leading to an integrated view of PSC occurrence that is free from sampling issues, allowing us to document the past evolution of the PSC season.
Charlotte M. Beall, Po-Lun Ma, Matthew W. Christensen, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Adam Varble, Kentaroh Suzuki, and Takuro Michibata
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5287–5302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5287-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5287-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Single-layer warm liquid clouds cover nearly one-third of the Earth's surface, and uncertainties regarding the impact of aerosols on their radiative properties pose a significant challenge to climate prediction. Here, we demonstrate how satellite observations can be used to constrain Earth system model estimates of the radiative forcing from the interactions of aerosols with clouds due to warm rain processes.
Taufiq Hassan, Kai Zhang, Jianfeng Li, Balwinder Singh, Shixuan Zhang, Hailong Wang, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3507–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Anthropogenic aerosol emissions are an essential part of global aerosol models. Significant errors can exist from the loss of emission heterogeneity. We introduced an emission treatment that significantly improved aerosol emission heterogeneity in high-resolution model simulations, with improvements in simulated aerosol surface concentrations. The emission treatment will provide a more accurate representation of aerosol emissions and their effects on climate.
Yu Yao, Po-Lun Ma, Yi Qin, Matthew W. Christensen, Hui Wan, Kai Zhang, Balwinder Singh, Meng Huang, and Mikhail Ovchinnikov
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-523, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-523, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Giant aerosols have substantial effects on warm rain formation. However, it remains challenging to quantify the impact of giant particles at global scale. In this work, we applied earth system model to investigate its impacts by implementing new giant aerosol treatments to consider its physical process. We found this approach substantially affect liquid cloud and improved model's precipitation response to aerosols. Our findings demonstrate the significant impact of giant aerosols on climate.
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1869–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a request for sub-daily data to accurately capture the process-level connections between land states, surface fluxes, and the boundary layer response. This high-frequency model output will allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, enable demonstration of inter-model spread in land–atmosphere coupling processes, and aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
Jianfeng Li, Kai Zhang, Taufiq Hassan, Shixuan Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, Qiyang Yan, and Huilin Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1327–1347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By comparing E3SM simulations with and without regional refinement, we find that model horizontal grid spacing considerably affects the simulated aerosol mass budget, aerosol–cloud interactions, and the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols. The study identifies the critical physical processes strongly influenced by model resolution. It also highlights the benefit of applying regional refinement in future modeling studies at higher or even convection-permitting resolutions.
Yuying Zhang, Shaocheng Xie, Yi Qin, Wuyin Lin, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Xue Zheng, Po-Lun Ma, Yun Qian, Qi Tang, Christopher R. Terai, and Meng Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 169–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-169-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-169-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We performed systematic evaluation of clouds simulated in the Energy
Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv2) to document model performance and understand what updates in E3SMv2 have caused changes in clouds from E3SMv1 to E3SMv2. We find that stratocumulus clouds along the subtropical west coast of continents are dramatically improved, primarily due to the retuning done in CLUBB. This study offers additional insights into clouds simulated in E3SMv2 and will benefit future E3SM developments.
Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv2) to document model performance and understand what updates in E3SMv2 have caused changes in clouds from E3SMv1 to E3SMv2. We find that stratocumulus clouds along the subtropical west coast of continents are dramatically improved, primarily due to the retuning done in CLUBB. This study offers additional insights into clouds simulated in E3SMv2 and will benefit future E3SM developments.
Shuaiqi Tang, Adam C. Varble, Jerome D. Fast, Kai Zhang, Peng Wu, Xiquan Dong, Fan Mei, Mikhail Pekour, Joseph C. Hardin, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6355–6376, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6355-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6355-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To assess the ability of Earth system model (ESM) predictions, we developed a tool called ESMAC Diags to understand how aerosols, clouds, and aerosol–cloud interactions are represented in ESMs. This paper describes its version 2 functionality. We compared the model predictions with measurements taken by planes, ships, satellites, and ground instruments over four regions across the world. Results show that this new tool can help identify model problems and guide future development of ESMs.
Adam C. Varble, Po-Lun Ma, Matthew W. Christensen, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Shuaiqi Tang, and Jerome Fast
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13523–13553, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13523-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13523-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate how clouds change in response to changing atmospheric particle (aerosol) concentrations in a climate model and find that the model-predicted cloud brightness increases too much as aerosols increase because the cloud drop number increases too much. Excessive drizzle in the model mutes this difference. Many differences between observational and model estimates are explained by varying assumptions of how much liquid has been lost in clouds, which impacts the estimated cloud drop number.
Artem G. Feofilov, Hélène Chepfer, Vincent Noël, and Frederic Szczap
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3363–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3363-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3363-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The response of clouds to human-induced climate warming remains the largest source of uncertainty in model predictions of climate. We consider cloud retrievals from spaceborne observations, the existing CALIOP lidar and future ATLID lidar; show how they compare for the same scenes; and discuss the advantage of adding a new lidar for detecting cloud changes in the long run. We show that ATLID's advanced technology should allow for better detecting thinner clouds during daytime than before.
Aishwarya Raman, Thomas Hill, Paul J. DeMott, Balwinder Singh, Kai Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Mingxuan Wu, Hailong Wang, Simon P. Alexander, and Susannah M. Burrows
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5735–5762, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ice-nucleating particles (INPs) play an important role in cloud processes and associated precipitation. Yet, INPs are not accurately represented in climate models. This study attempts to uncover these gaps by comparing model-simulated INP concentrations against field campaign measurements in the SO for an entire year, 2017–2018. Differences in INP concentrations and variability between the model and observations have major implications for modeling cloud properties in high latitudes.
Andrew Geiss, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, and Joseph C. Hardin
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2355–2370, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2355-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2355-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric aerosols play a critical role in Earth's climate, but it is too computationally expensive to directly model their interaction with radiation in climate simulations. This work develops a new neural-network-based parameterization of aerosol optical properties for use in the Energy Exascale Earth System Model that is much more accurate than the current one; it also introduces a unique model optimization method that involves randomly generating neural network architectures.
Matthew W. Christensen, Po-Lun Ma, Peng Wu, Adam C. Varble, Johannes Mülmenstädt, and Jerome D. Fast
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2789–2812, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An increase in aerosol concentration (tiny airborne particles) is shown to suppress rainfall and increase the abundance of droplets in clouds passing over Graciosa Island in the Azores. Cloud drops remain affected by aerosol for several days across thousands of kilometers in satellite data. Simulations from an Earth system model show good agreement, but differences in the amount of cloud water and its extent remain despite modifications to model parameters that control the warm-rain process.
Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Po-Lun Ma, Johannes Quaas, David M. Winker, Artem Feofilov, and Nick Schutgens
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1359–1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol has a large impact on climate. Using a lidar aerosol simulator ensures consistent comparisons between modeled and observed aerosol. We present a lidar aerosol simulator that applies a cloud masking and an aerosol detection threshold. We estimate the lidar signals that would be observed at 532 nm by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization overflying the atmosphere predicted by a climate model. Our comparison at the seasonal timescale shows a discrepancy in the Southern Ocean.
Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Megan D. Fowler, Vincent E. Larson, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6371–6384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The land surface in one grid cell may be diverse in character. This study uses an explicit way to account for that subgrid diversity in a state-of-the-art Earth system model (ESM) and explores its implications for the overlying atmosphere. We find that the shallow clouds are increased significantly with the land surface diversity. Our work highlights the importance of accurately representing the land surface and its interaction with the atmosphere in next-generation ESMs.
Matthias Tesche and Vincent Noel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4225–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Mid-level and high clouds can be considered natural laboratories for studying cloud glaciation in the atmosphere. While they can be conveniently observed from ground with lidar, such measurements require a clear line of sight between the instrument and the target cloud. Here, observations of clouds with two spaceborne lidars are used to assess where ground-based lidar measurements of mid- and upper-level clouds are least affected by the light-attenuating effect of low-level clouds.
Kai Zhang, Wentao Zhang, Hui Wan, Philip J. Rasch, Steven J. Ghan, Richard C. Easter, Xiangjun Shi, Yong Wang, Hailong Wang, Po-Lun Ma, Shixuan Zhang, Jian Sun, Susannah M. Burrows, Manish Shrivastava, Balwinder Singh, Yun Qian, Xiaohong Liu, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Qi Tang, Xue Zheng, Shaocheng Xie, Wuyin Lin, Yan Feng, Minghuai Wang, Jin-Ho Yoon, and L. Ruby Leung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9129–9160, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9129-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we analyze the effective aerosol forcing simulated by E3SM version 1 using both century-long free-running and short nudged simulations. The aerosol forcing in E3SMv1 is relatively large compared to other models, mainly due to the large indirect aerosol effect. Aerosol-induced changes in liquid and ice cloud properties in E3SMv1 have a strong correlation. The aerosol forcing estimates in E3SMv1 are sensitive to the parameterization changes in both liquid and ice cloud processes.
Assia Arouf, Hélène Chepfer, Thibault Vaillant de Guélis, Marjolaine Chiriaco, Matthew D. Shupe, Rodrigo Guzman, Artem Feofilov, Patrick Raberanto, Tristan S. L'Ecuyer, Seiji Kato, and Michael R. Gallagher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3893–3923, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3893-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3893-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We proposed new estimates of the surface longwave (LW) cloud radiative effect (CRE) derived from observations collected by a space-based lidar on board the CALIPSO satellite and radiative transfer computations. Our estimate appropriately captures the surface LW CRE annual variability over bright polar surfaces, and it provides a dataset more than 13 years long.
Shuaiqi Tang, Jerome D. Fast, Kai Zhang, Joseph C. Hardin, Adam C. Varble, John E. Shilling, Fan Mei, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4055–4076, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4055-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4055-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an Earth system model (ESM) diagnostics package to compare various types of aerosol properties simulated in ESMs with aircraft, ship, and surface measurements from six field campaigns across spatial scales. The diagnostics package is coded and organized to be flexible and modular for future extension to other field campaign datasets and adapted to higher-resolution model simulations. Future releases will include comprehensive cloud and aerosol–cloud interaction diagnostics.
Susannah M. Burrows, Richard C. Easter, Xiaohong Liu, Po-Lun Ma, Hailong Wang, Scott M. Elliott, Balwinder Singh, Kai Zhang, and Philip J. Rasch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5223–5251, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea spray particles are composed of a mixture of salts and organic substances from oceanic microorganisms. In prior work, our team developed an approach connecting sea spray chemistry to ocean biology, called OCEANFILMS. Here we describe its implementation within an Earth system model, E3SM. We show that simulated sea spray chemistry is consistent with observed seasonal cycles and that sunlight reflected by simulated Southern Ocean clouds increases, consistent with analysis of satellite data.
Po-Lun Ma, Bryce E. Harrop, Vincent E. Larson, Richard B. Neale, Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Yuying Zhang, Yun Qian, Jin-Ho Yoon, Christopher R. Jones, Meng Huang, Sheng-Lun Tai, Balwinder Singh, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Xue Zheng, Wuyin Lin, Johannes Quaas, Hélène Chepfer, Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Samson Hagos, Zhibo Zhang, Hua Song, Xiaohong Liu, Michael S. Pritchard, Hui Wan, Jingyu Wang, Qi Tang, Peter M. Caldwell, Jiwen Fan, Larry K. Berg, Jerome D. Fast, Mark A. Taylor, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Shaocheng Xie, Philip J. Rasch, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2881–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
An alternative set of parameters for E3SM Atmospheric Model version 1 has been developed based on a tuning strategy that focuses on clouds. When clouds in every regime are improved, other aspects of the model are also improved, even though they are not the direct targets for calibration. The recalibrated model shows a lower sensitivity to anthropogenic aerosols and surface warming, suggesting potential improvements to the simulated climate in the past and future.
Michael R. Gallagher, Matthew D. Shupe, Hélène Chepfer, and Tristan L'Ecuyer
The Cryosphere, 16, 435–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-435-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-435-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
By using direct observations of snowfall and mass changes, the variability of daily snowfall mass input to the Greenland ice sheet is quantified for the first time. With new methods we conclude that cyclones west of Greenland in summer contribute the most snowfall, with 1.66 Gt per occurrence. These cyclones are contextualized in the broader Greenland climate, and snowfall is validated against mass changes to verify the results. Snowfall and mass change observations are shown to agree well.
Matthew W. Christensen, Andrew Gettelman, Jan Cermak, Guy Dagan, Michael Diamond, Alyson Douglas, Graham Feingold, Franziska Glassmeier, Tom Goren, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Edward Gryspeerdt, Ralph Kahn, Zhanqing Li, Po-Lun Ma, Florent Malavelle, Isabel L. McCoy, Daniel T. McCoy, Greg McFarquhar, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Sandip Pal, Anna Possner, Adam Povey, Johannes Quaas, Daniel Rosenfeld, Anja Schmidt, Roland Schrödner, Armin Sorooshian, Philip Stier, Velle Toll, Duncan Watson-Parris, Robert Wood, Mingxi Yang, and Tianle Yuan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 641–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Trace gases and aerosols (tiny airborne particles) are released from a variety of point sources around the globe. Examples include volcanoes, industrial chimneys, forest fires, and ship stacks. These sources provide opportunistic experiments with which to quantify the role of aerosols in modifying cloud properties. We review the current state of understanding on the influence of aerosol on climate built from the wide range of natural and anthropogenic laboratories investigated in recent decades.
Zhonghua Zheng, Matthew West, Lei Zhao, Po-Lun Ma, Xiaohong Liu, and Nicole Riemer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17727–17741, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17727-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17727-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol mixing state is an important emergent property that affects aerosol radiative forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions, but it has not been easy to constrain this property globally. We present a framework for evaluating the error in aerosol mixing state induced by aerosol representation assumptions, which is one of the important contributors to structural uncertainty in aerosol models. Our study provides insights into potential improvements to model process representation for aerosols.
Cited articles
Adriani, A., Massoli, P., Di Donfrancesco, G., Cairo, F., Moriconi, M. L., and Snels, M.: Climatology of polar stratospheric clouds basedon lidar
observations from 1993 to 2001 over McMurdo Station,Antarctica, J. Geophys.
Res., 109, D24211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004800, 2004.
Andersson, E., Dabas, A., Endemann, M., Ingmann, P., Källén, E., Offiler, D., and Stoffelen, A.: ADM-Aeolus Science Report, SP-1311, ESA Communication Production Office, The Netherlands,
121 pp., ISBN 978-92-9221-404-3, ISSN 0379-6566, 2008.
Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Le Rille, O., Lajas, D., and Straume, A. G.:
Particle backscatter and extinction profiling with the space-borne
high-spectral-resolution Doppler lidar ALADIN: methodology and simulations.
Appl. Optics, 46, 6606–6622, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.006606, 2007.
Baars, H., Geiß, A., Wandinger, U., Herzog, A., Engelmann, R., Bühl,
J., Radenz, M., Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Martin, A., Leinweber, R.,
Lehmann, V., Weissmann, M., Cress, A., Filioglou, M., Komppula, M., and
Reitebuch, O.: First Results from the German Cal/Val Activities for Aeolus,
EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01008, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023701008, 2020.
Boutle, I. A., Abel, S. J., Hill, P. G., and Morcrette, C. J.: Spatial
variability of liquid cloud and rain: observations and microphysical
effects, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 583–594, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2140, 2014.
Bucholtz, A.: Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial
atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 34, 2765–2773, 1995.
Chahine, M. T., Pagano, T. S., Aumann, H. H., Atlas, R., Barnet, C., Blaisdell, J., CHen, L., Divakarla, M., Fetzer, E. J., GOLdberg, M., Gautier, C., Granger, S., Hannon, S., Irion, F. W., Kakar, R., Kalnay, E., Lambrigtsen, B. H., Lee, S., Le Marshall, J., Mcmillan, W. W., Mcmillin, L., Olsen, E. T., Revercomb, H., Rosenkranz, P., Smith, W. L., Staelin, D., Strow, L. L., Susskind, J., Tobin, D., Wolf, W., and Zhou, L.: AIRS: Improving weather forecasting and providing new data on green-house gases, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 911–926, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-7-911, 2006.
Chalon G., Cayla F. R., and Diebel D.: IASI: An advance sounder for operational meteorology, Proc. 52nd Congress of IAF, Toulouse France, CNES, 1–5 October 2001, https://dl.iafastro.directory/event/IAC-2001/paper/IAF-01-B.3.10/ (last access: 9 February 2022), 2001.
Chanin, M. L., Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., and Porteneuve, J.: A Doppler
lidar for measuring winds in the middle atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
16, 1273–1276, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i011p01273, 1989.
Chepfer, H., Bony, S., Winker, D., Chiriaco, M., Dufresne, J.-L., and Sèze, G.: Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model, Geophys. Res. Let., 35, L15704,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034207, 2008.
Chepfer, H., Bony, S., Winker, D., Cesana,G., Dufresne, J.-L., Minnis, P.,
Stubenrauch, C. J., and Zeng, S.: The GCM Oriented Calipso Cloud Product
(CALIPSO-GOCCP), J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012251,
2010.
Chepfer H., Cesana, G., Winker, D., Getzewich, B., and Vaughan, M.:
Comparison of Two Different Cloud Climatologies Derived from CALIOP-Attenuated Backscattered Measurements (Level 1): The CALIPSO-ST and the CALIPSO-GOCCP, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
30, 725–744, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00057.1, 2013.
Chepfer, H., Noël, V., Winker, D., and Chiriaco, M.: Where and when will
we observe cloud changes due to climate warming?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
8387–8395, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061792, 2014.
Chepfer H., Noël, V., Chiriaco, M., Wielicki, B., Winker, D., Loeb, N.,
and Wood, R.: The potential of multi-decades space-born lidar to constrain
cloud feedbacks, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 5433–5454, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027742, 2018.
Chepfer, H., Brogniez, H., and Noël, V.: Diurnal variations of cloud and
relative humidity profiles across the tropics, Sci. Rep., 9, 16045,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52437-6, 2019.
Chiriaco, M., Vautard, R., Chepfer, H., Haeffelin, M., Dudhia, J.,
Wanherdrick, Y., Morille, Y., and Protat, A.: The Ability of MM5 to Simulate Ice Clouds: Systematic Comparison between Simulated and Measured Fluxes and Lidar/Radar Profiles at the SIRTA Atmospheric Observatory, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 897–918, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3102.1, 2006.
Ciddor, P. E.: Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and
near infrared, Appl. Optics, 35, 1566–1573, 1996.
Collis, R. T. H. and Russell, P. B.: Lidar measurement of particles and gases
by elastic backscattering and differential absorption, in: Laser Monitoring of the Atmosphere, Topics in Applied Physics,edited by: Hinkley, E. D.,
Springer-Verlag, 14, 71–150, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07743-X_18, ISBN 978-3-540-07743-5, 1976.
Donovan, D. P., Marseille, G.-J., de Kloe, J., and Stoffelen, A.: AEOLUS L2
activities at KNMI, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01002,
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023701002, 2020.
ESA: ALADIN overview and timeline of the RBS settings, ESA News,
https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/instruments/aladin/overview-of-the-main-wind-rbs-changes (last access: 9 February 2022), 2021.
Feofilov, A. G. and Stubenrauch, C. J.: LMD Cloud Retrieval using IR sounders. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for CIRS-LMD software package (v2), ResearchGate, 19 pp., https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15812.63361, 2017.
Feofilov, A. G. and Stubenrauch, C. J.: Diurnal variation of high-level clouds from the synergy of AIRS and IASI space-borne infrared sounders, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13957–13972, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13957-2019, 2019.
Feofilov, A. G., Chepfer, H., Noël, V., Guzman, R., Gindre, C., Ma,
P.-L., and Chiriaco, M.: Collocated ALADIN/Aeolus and CALIOP/CALIPSO
observations for the period of 28/06/2019-31/12/2019, version 2,
ResearchGate [data set], https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16562.94409, 2021.
Flamant, P., Cuesta, J., Denneulin, M.-L., Dabas, A., and Hubert, D.:
ADM-Aeolus retrieval algorithms for aerosol and cloud products, Tellus A,
60, 273–288, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00287.x, 2008.
Flamant, P. H., Lever, V., Martinet, P., Flament, T., Cuesta, J., Dabas, A.,
Olivier, M., and Huber, D.: ADM-Aeolus L2A Algorithm Theoretical Baseline
Document, Particle spin-off products, ESA, AE-TN-IPSL-GS-001, V5.5, 83 pp., https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/Aeolus-L2A-ATBD.pdf (last access: 9 February 2022), 2017.
Garnier, A., Pelon, J., Vaughan, M. A., Winker, D. M., Trepte, C. R., and Dubuisson, P.: Lidar multiple scattering factors inferred from CALIPSO lidar and IIR retrievals of semi-transparent cirrus cloud optical depths over oceans, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2759–2774, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2759-2015, 2015.
Guzman, R., Chepfer, H., Noël, V., Vaillant de Guelis, T., Kay, J. E.,
Raberanto, P., Cesana, G., Vaughan, M. A., and Winker, D. M.: Direct
atmosphere opacity observations from CALIPSO provide new constraints on
cloud-radiation interactions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1066–1085,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025946, 2017.
Héliere, A., Gelsthorpe, R., Le Hors, L., and Toulemont, Y.: ATLID, the
Atmospheric Lidar on board the EarthCARE Satellite, in: International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2012, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, 9–12 October 2012, 105642D, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2309095, 2012.
Hilton, F., Armante, R., August, T., et al.: Hyperspectral Earth observation from IASI: Five years of accomplishments, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 347–370, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00027.1, 2012.
Jumelet, J., Bekki, S., David, C., Keckhut, P., and Baumgarten, G.: Size
distribution time series of a polar stratospheric cloud observed above
Arctic Lidar Observatory for Middle Atmosphere Research (ALOMAR)
(69∘ N) and analyzed from multiwavelength lidar measurements
during winter 2005, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D02202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010119, 2019.
Kanitz, T., Ciapponi, A., Mondello, A., D’Ottavi, A., Baselga Mateo, A. B., Straume, A.-G., Voland, C., Bon, D., Checa, E., Alvarez, E., Bellucci, I., Pereira Do Carmo, J., Brewster, J., Marshall, J., Schillinger, M., Hannington, M., Rennie, M., Reitebuch, O., Lecrenier, O., Bravetti, P., Sacchieri,V., De Sanctis, V., Lefebvre, A., Parrinello, T., and Wernham, D.: ESA's Lidar Missions Aeolus and EarthCARE, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01006, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023701006, 2020.
Krawczyk, R., Ghibaudo, J.-B., Labandibar, J.-Y., Willetts, D. V., Vaughan,
M., Pearson, G. N., Harris, M. R., Flamant, P. H., Salamitou, P., Dabas, A.
M., Charasse, R., Midavaine, T., Royer, M., and Heimel, H.: ALADIN: an
atmosphere laser Doppler wind lidar instrument for wind velocity
measurements from space, in: Lidar Techniques for Remote
Sensing II, SPIE 2581, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.228509, 1995.
Lolli, S., Delaval, A., Loth, C., Garnier, A., and Flamant, P. H.: 0.355-micrometer direct detection wind lidar under testing during a field campaign in consideration of ESA's ADM-Aeolus mission, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3349–3358, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3349-2013, 2013.
McGill, M. J., Yorks, J. E., Scott, V. S., Kupchock, A. W., and Selmer, P.
A.: The Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS): A technology demonstration on
the International Space Station, Proc. Spie., 9612, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2190841,
2015.
Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Borbas, E. E., Baum, B. A., Cureton, G., and
Bearson, N.: Reprocessing of HIRS Satellite Measurements from 1980 to 2015:
Development towards a consistent decadal cloud record, J. Appl. Meteorol.
Clim., 55, 2397–2410, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0129.1, 2016.
Nam C., Bony, S., Dufresne, J. L., and Chepfer, H.: The 'too few, too bright'
tropical low-cloud problem in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21801,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053421, 2012.
Noel, V., Hertzog, A., Chepfer, H., and Winker, D.: Polar stratospheric
clouds over Antarctica from the CALIPSO space-borne lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D02205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008616, 2008.
Noel, V., Chepfer, H., Chiriaco, M., and Yorks, J.: The diurnal cycle of cloud profiles over land and ocean between 51∘ S and 51∘ N, seen by the CATS spaceborne lidar from the International Space Station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9457–9473, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9457-2018, 2018.
Rasch, P., Xie, S., Ma, P.-L., et al.: An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 2377–2411, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001629, 2019.
Reitebuch, O., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Marksteiner, U., Rahm, S., Weiler, F., Witschas, B., Meringer, M., Schmidt, K., Huber, D., Nikolaus, I., Geiss, A., Vaughan, M., Dabas, A., Flament, T., Stieglitz, H., Isaksen, L., Rennie, M., de Kloe, J., Marseille, G.-J., Stoffelen, A., Wernham, D., Kanitz, T., Straume, A.-G., Fehr, T., von Bismarck, J., Floberghagen, R., and Parrinello, T.: Initial Assessment of the Performance of the First Wind Lidar in Space on Aeolus, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01010, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023701010, 2020.
Reverdy, M., Chepfer, H., Donovan, D., Noël, V., Cesana, G., Hoareau, C.,
Chiriaco, M., and Bastin, S.: An EarthCARE/ATLID simulator to evaluate cloud
description in climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
11090–11113, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023919, 2015.
Rienecker, M.: File Specification for GEOS-5 DAS Gridded Output, Document
No. GMAO-1001v6.4, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, available at:
https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/GMAO_products/documents/GEOS-5.2.0_File_Specification.pdf (last access: 9 February 2022), 2008.
Smith, W. L.: The TIROS-N operational vertical sounder, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 60, 1177–1187, 1979.
Snels, M., Colao, F., Cairo, F., Shuli, I., Scoccione, A., De Muro, M., Pitts, M., Poole, L., and Di Liberto, L.: Quasi-coincident observations of polar stratospheric clouds by ground-based lidar and CALIOP at Concordia (Dome C, Antarctica) from 2014 to 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2165–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2165-2021, 2021.
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Boain, R. J., Mace, G. G., Sassen, K., Wang, Z., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Rossow, W. B., Durden, S. L., Miller, S. D., Austin, R. T., Benedetti, A., Mitrescu, C., and the CloudSat Science Team: The CloudSat mission and the A-Train: A new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1771–1790, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-12-1771, 2002.
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Tanelli, S., Im, E., Durden, S., Rokey, M.,
Reinke, D., Partain, P., Mace, G. G., Austin, R., L'Ecuyer, T., Haynes, J.,
Lebsock, M., Suzuki, K., Waliser, D., Wu, D., Kay, J., Gettelman, A., Wang,
Z., and Marchand, R.: CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after
the first year of operation, J. Geophys. Res. Atm., 114, D00A18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009982, 2009.
Stoffelen, A., Pailleux, J., Källén, E., Vaughan, J. M., Isaksen,
L., Flamant, P., Wergen, W., Andersson, E., Schyberg, H., Culoma, A.,
Meynart, R., Endemann, M., and Ingmann, P.: The Atmospheric Dynamics Mission
For Global Wind Field Measurement, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 73–87,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-1-73, 2005.
Straume, A. G., Rennie, M., Isaksen, L., de Kloe, J., Marseille, G.-J., Stoffelen, A., Flament, T., Stieglitz, H., Dabas, A., Huber, D., Reitebuch, O., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Marksteiner, U., Weiler, F., Witschas, B., Meringer, M., Schmidt, K., Nikolaus, I., Geiss, A., Flamant, P., Kanitz, T., Wernham, D., von Bismarck, J., Bley, S., Fehr, T., Floberghagen, R., and Parinello, T.: ESA's Space-Based Doppler Wind Lidar Mission Aeolus – First Wind and Aerosol Product Assessment Results, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 01007, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20202370100, 2020.
Stubenrauch, C. J., Rossow, W. B., Kinne, S., Ackerman, S., Cesana, G., Chepfer, H., Di Girolamo, L., Getzewich, B., Guignard, A., Heidinger, A., Maddux, B. C., Menzel, W. P., Minnis, P., Pearl, C., Platnick, S., Poulsen, C., Riedi, J., Sun-Mack, S., Walther, A., Winker, D., Zeng, S., and Zhao, G.: Assessment of global cloud datasets from satellites: Project and database initiated by the GEWEX radiation panel, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1031–1049, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00117.1, 2013.
Stubenrauch, C. J., Feofilov, A. G., Protopapadaki, S. E., and Armante, R.: Cloud climatologies from the infrared sounders AIRS and IASI: strengths and applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13625–13644, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13625-2017, 2017.
Swales, D. J., Pincus, R., and Bodas-Salcedo, A.: The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project Observational Simulator Package: Version 2, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 77–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-77-2018, 2018.
Vaillant de Guélis T., H. Chepfer, Noël, V., Guzman, R., Bonazzola,
M., and Winker, D. M.: Space lidar observations constrain longwave cloud
feedback, Sci. Rep., 8, 16570, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34943-1, 2018.
Weiler, F., Kanitz, T., Wernham, D., Rennie, M., Huber, D., Schillinger, M.,
Saint-Pe, O., Bell, R., Parrinello, T., and Reitebuch, O.: Characterization
of dark current signal measurements of the ACCDs used on-board the Aeolus
satellite, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5153–5177,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5153-2021, 2021.
Winker, D. M.: Accounting for multiple scattering in retrievals from space
lidar, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 5059, 128–139, 2003.
Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., and Hostetler, C. A.: Status and Performance of
the CALIOP Lidar, Proc. SPIE, 5575, 8–15, 2004.
Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., and McGill, M. J.: Initial performance
assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030135, 2007.
Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A. H., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z.,
Hunt, W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP
Data Processing Algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2310–2323,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1, 2009.
Winker, D., Chepfer, H., Noël, V., and Cai, X.: Observational
constraints on cloud feedbacks: The role of active satellite sensors, Surv. Geophys., 38, 1483–1508, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9452-0, 2017.
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M.,
Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity
in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett, 47, e2019GL085782,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782, 2020.
Short summary
Space-borne lidars have been providing invaluable information of atmospheric optical properties since 2006, and new lidar missions are on the way to ensure continuous observations. In this work, we compare the clouds estimated from space-borne ALADIN and CALIOP lidar observations. The analysis of collocated data shows that the agreement between the retrieved clouds is good up to 3 km height. Above that, ALADIN detects 40 % less clouds than CALIOP, except for polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs).
Space-borne lidars have been providing invaluable information of atmospheric optical properties...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint