Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-871-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-871-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 Feb 2023
Research article |
| 20 Feb 2023
| 20 Feb 2023
Retrieval of microphysical parameters of monsoonal rain using X-band dual-polarization radar: their seasonal dependence and evaluation
Kumar Abhijeet
National Atmospheric Research Laboratory, Gadanki-517112, Andhra Pradesh, India
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology,
Thiruvananthapuram-695547, Kerala, India
National Atmospheric Research Laboratory, Gadanki-517112, Andhra Pradesh, India
Nidamanuri Rama Rao
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology,
Thiruvananthapuram-695547, Kerala, India
Kasimahanthi Amar Jyothi
National Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast, Noida-201309, India
Related authors
No articles found.
A. Galodha, R. Vashisht, R. R. Nidamanuri, and A. M. Ramiya
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 577–584, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-577-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-577-2022, 2022
Kadiri Saikranthi, Basivi Radhakrishna, Thota Narayana Rao, and Sreedharan Krishnakumari Satheesh
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10423–10432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10423-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10423-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies have shown that simulation of monsoons can be improved with an exact representation of SST–precipitation relationship. The vertical structure of precipitation with SST is distinctly different over the Arabian Sea than over the Bay of Bengal. The reflectivity profiles show variation with SST over the Arabian Sea and do not show considerable variation with SST over the Bay of Bengal. The variations in reflectivity profiles seem to originate at the cloud formation stage itself.
K. Sunilkumar, T. Narayana Rao, and S. Satheeshkumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1719–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1719-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1719-2016, 2016
S. Satheesh Kumar, T. Narayana Rao, and A. Taori
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3893–3901, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3893-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3893-2015, 2015
A. Sandeep, T. N. Rao, and S. V. B. Rao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7605–7617, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7605-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7605-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The afternoon-evening transition (AET) in the atmospheric boundary layer has been studied in an integrated approach using 3 years of tower, sodar and wind profiler measurements. Such a long-term data set has been used for the first time to understand the behavior of AET. It allowed us to study the seasonal variation. In contrast to the common belief that the transition evolves from bottom to top, the present study clearly showed that the start time of transition follows top-to-bottom evolution.
Related subject area
Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Assessing Arctic low-level clouds and precipitation from above – a radar perspective
What CloudSat cannot see: liquid water content profiles inferred from MODIS and CALIOP observations
Validation of the Cloud_CCI (Cloud Climate Change Initiative) cloud products in the Arctic
The Education and Research 3D Radiative Transfer Toolbox (EaR3T) – towards the mitigation of 3D bias in airborne and spaceborne passive imagery cloud retrievals
Consistency test of precipitating ice cloud retrieval properties obtained from the observations of different instruments operating at Dome C (Antarctica)
Sizing ice hydrometeor populations using the dual-wavelength radar ratio
Impact of the revisit frequency on cloud climatology for CALIPSO, EarthCARE, Aeolus, and ICESat-2 satellite lidar missions
The impact of sampling strategy on the cloud droplet number concentration estimated from satellite data
Horizontal geometry of trade wind cumuli – aircraft observations from a shortwave infrared imager versus a radar profiler
Evaluating the consistency and continuity of pixel-scale cloud property data records from Aqua and SNPP (Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership)
Quality assessment of Second-generation Global Imager (SGLI)-observed cloud properties using SKYNET surface observation data
Comparison of scattering ratio profiles retrieved from ALADIN/Aeolus and CALIOP/CALIPSO observations and preliminary estimates of cloud fraction profiles
Evaluation of convective cloud microphysics in numerical weather prediction models with dual-wavelength polarimetric radar observations: methods and examples
Synergistic radar and sub-millimeter radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors in mid-latitude frontal cloud systems
Evaluation of satellite retrievals of liquid clouds from the GOES-13 imager and MODIS over the midlatitude North Atlantic during the NAAMES campaign
Evaluation of Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) neural network cloud detection against current operational cloud masks
The effect of low-level thin arctic clouds on shortwave irradiance: evaluation of estimates from spaceborne passive imagery with aircraft observations
Validation of the Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI cloud data with Cloudnet, Aura OMI O2–O2, MODIS, and Suomi-NPP VIIRS
Dissecting effects of orbital drift of polar-orbiting satellites on accuracy and trends of climate data records of cloud fractional cover
Calibration of global MODIS cloud amount using CALIOP cloud profiles
Evaluation of the MODIS Collection 6 multilayer cloud detection algorithm through comparisons with CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and CALIPSO CALIOP products
An extended radar relative calibration adjustment (eRCA) technique for higher-frequency radars and range–height indicator (RHI) scans
Comparing lightning observations of the ground-based European lightning location system EUCLID and the space-based Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on the International Space Station (ISS)
Microwave and submillimeter wave scattering of oriented ice particles
Shallow cumuli cover and its uncertainties from ground-based lidar–radar data and sky images
Using passive and active observations at microwave and sub-millimetre wavelengths to constrain ice particle models
Comparison of the cloud top heights retrieved from MODIS and AHI satellite data with ground-based Ka-band radar
Cross-comparison of cloud liquid water path derived from observations by two space-borne and one ground-based instrument in northern Europe
The impact of neglecting ice phase on cloud optical depth retrievals from AERONET cloud mode observations
Diurnal and nocturnal cloud segmentation of all-sky imager (ASI) images using enhancement fully convolutional networks
Can liquid cloud microphysical processes be used for vertically pointing cloud radar calibration?
Calibration of a 35 GHz airborne cloud radar: lessons learned and intercomparisons with 94 GHz cloud radars
Airborne validation of radiative transfer modelling of ice clouds at millimetre and sub-millimetre wavelengths
Assessing the impact of different liquid water permittivity models on the fit between model and observations
Cloud liquid water path in the sub-Arctic region of Europe as derived from ground-based and space-borne remote observations
Correction of CCI cloud data over the Swiss Alps using ground-based radiation measurements
Cloud heterogeneity on cloud and aerosol above cloud properties retrieved from simulated total and polarized reflectances
Orographic and convective gravity waves above the Alps and Andes Mountains during GPS radio occultation events – a case study
Neural network cloud top pressure and height for MODIS
Preliminary verification for application of a support vector machine-based cloud detection method to GOSAT-2 CAI-2
Evaluation of Himawari-8 surface downwelling solar radiation by ground-based measurements
Characterization of AVHRR global cloud detection sensitivity based on CALIPSO-CALIOP cloud optical thickness information: demonstration of results based on the CM SAF CLARA-A2 climate data record
Analysis of lightning outliers in the EUCLID network
Characterisation of the artificial neural network CiPS for cirrus cloud remote sensing with MSG/SEVIRI
Analysis and evaluation of WRF microphysical schemes for deep moist convection over south-eastern South America (SESA) using microwave satellite observations and radiative transfer simulations
Remote sensing of multiple cloud layer heights using multi-angular measurements
Differences in liquid cloud droplet effective radius and number concentration estimates between MODIS collections 5.1 and 6 over global oceans
In-operation field-of-view retrieval (IFR) for satellite and ground-based DOAS-type instruments applying coincident high-resolution imager data
Marine boundary layer cloud property retrievals from high-resolution ASTER observations: case studies and comparison with Terra MODIS
Coupling sky images with radiative transfer models: a new method to estimate cloud optical depth
Imke Schirmacher, Pavlos Kollias, Katia Lamer, Mario Mech, Lukas Pfitzenmaier, Manfred Wendisch, and Susanne Crewell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4081–4100, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4081-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4081-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
CloudSat’s relatively coarse spatial resolution, low sensitivity, and blind zone limit its assessment of Arctic low-level clouds, which affect the surface energy balance. We compare cloud fractions from CloudSat and finely resolved airborne radar observations to determine CloudSat’s limitations. Cloudsat overestimates cloud fractions above its blind zone, especially during cold-air outbreaks over open water, and misses a cloud fraction of 32 % and half of the precipitation inside its blind zone.
Richard M. Schulte, Matthew D. Lebsock, and John M. Haynes
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3531–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3531-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3531-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In order to constrain climate models and better understand how clouds might change in future climates, accurate satellite estimates of cloud liquid water content are important. The satellite currently best suited to this purpose, CloudSat, is not sensitive enough to detect some non-raining low clouds. In this study we show that information from two other satellite instruments, MODIS and CALIOP, can be combined to provide cloud water estimates for many of the clouds that are missed by CloudSat.
Kameswara S. Vinjamuri, Marco Vountas, Luca Lelli, Martin Stengel, Matthew D. Shupe, Kerstin Ebell, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2903–2918, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2903-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2903-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play an important role in Arctic amplification. Cloud data from ground-based sites are valuable but cannot represent the whole Arctic. Therefore the use of satellite products is a measure to cover the entire Arctic. However, the quality of such cloud measurements from space is not well known. The paper discusses the differences and commonalities between satellite and ground-based measurements. We conclude that the satellite dataset, with a few exceptions, can be used in the Arctic.
Hong Chen, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Steven T. Massie, Vikas Nataraja, Matthew S. Norgren, Jake J. Gristey, Graham Feingold, Robert E. Holz, and Hironobu Iwabuchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1971–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1971-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1971-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce the Education and Research 3D Radiative Transfer Toolbox (EaR3T) and propose a radiance self-consistency approach for quantifying and mitigating 3D bias in legacy airborne and spaceborne imagery retrievals due to spatially inhomogeneous clouds and surfaces.
Gianluca Di Natale, David D. Turner, Giovanni Bianchini, Massimo Del Guasta, Luca Palchetti, Alessandro Bracci, Luca Baldini, Tiziano Maestri, William Cossich, Michele Martinazzo, and Luca Facheris
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7235–7258, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7235-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7235-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we describe a new approach to test the consistency of the precipitating ice cloud optical and microphysical properties in Antarctica, Dome C, retrieved from hyperspectral measurements in the far-infrared, with the reflectivity detected by a co-located micro rain radar operating at 24 GHz. The retrieved ice crystal sizes were found in accordance with the direct measurements of an optical imager, also installed at Dome C, which can collect the falling ice particles.
Sergey Y. Matrosov, Alexei Korolev, Mengistu Wolde, and Cuong Nguyen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6373–6386, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A remote sensing method to retrieve sizes of particles in ice clouds and precipitation from radar measurements at two wavelengths is described. This method is based on relating the particle size information to the ratio of radar signals at these two wavelengths. It is demonstrated that this ratio is informative about different characteristic particle sizes. Knowing atmospheric ice particle sizes is important for many applications such as precipitation estimation and climate modeling.
Andrzej Z. Kotarba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4307–4322, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4307-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4307-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Space profiling lidars offer a unique insight into cloud properties in Earth’s atmosphere, and are considered the most reliable source of cloud information. However, lidar-based cloud climatologies are infrequently sampled: every 7 to 91 d, and only along the ground track. This study evaluated how accurate are the cloud data from existing (CALIPSO, ICESat-2, Aeolus) and planned (EarthCARE) space lidars, when compared to a cloud climatology obtained with observations taken every day.
Edward Gryspeerdt, Daniel T. McCoy, Ewan Crosbie, Richard H. Moore, Graeme J. Nott, David Painemal, Jennifer Small-Griswold, Armin Sorooshian, and Luke Ziemba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3875–3892, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3875-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3875-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Droplet number concentration is a key property of clouds, influencing a variety of cloud processes. It is also used for estimating the cloud response to aerosols. The satellite retrieval depends on a number of assumptions – different sampling strategies are used to select cases where these assumptions are most likely to hold. Here we investigate the impact of these strategies on the agreement with in situ data, the droplet number climatology and estimates of the indirect radiative forcing.
Henning Dorff, Heike Konow, and Felix Ament
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3641–3661, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study elaborates how aircraft-based horizontal geometries of trade wind cumuli differ whether a one-dimensional profiling radar or a two-dimensional imager is used. Cloud size distributions are examined in terms of sensitivity to sample size, resolution, and instrument field of view. While the radar cannot reproduce the double power law distribution due to coarse resolution and restriction to vertical transects, the imager also reveals the elliptic cloud structure enhancing with wind speed.
Qing Yue, Eric J. Fetzer, Likun Wang, Brian H. Kahn, Nadia Smith, John M. Blaisdell, Kerry G. Meyer, Mathias Schreier, Bjorn Lambrigtsen, and Irina Tkatcheva
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2099–2123, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2099-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2099-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The self-consistency and continuity of cloud retrievals from infrared sounders and imagers aboard Aqua and SNPP (Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership) are examined at the pixel scale. Cloud products are found to be consistent with each other. Differences between sounder products are mainly due to cloud clearing and the treatment of clouds in scenes with unsuccessful atmospheric retrievals. The impact of algorithm and instrument differences is clearly seen in the imager cloud retrievals.
Pradeep Khatri, Tadahiro Hayasaka, Hitoshi Irie, Husi Letu, Takashi Y. Nakajima, Hiroshi Ishimoto, and Tamio Takamura
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1967–1982, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1967-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud properties observed by the Second-generation Global Imager (SGLI) onboard the Global Change Observation Mission – Climate (GCOM-C) satellite are evaluated using surface observation data. The study finds that SGLI-observed cloud properties are qualitative enough, although water cloud properties are suggested to be more qualitative, and both water and ice cloud properties can reproduce surface irradiance quite satisfactorily. Thus, SGLI cloud products are very useful for different studies.
Artem G. Feofilov, Hélène Chepfer, Vincent Noël, Rodrigo Guzman, Cyprien Gindre, Po-Lun Ma, and Marjolaine Chiriaco
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1055–1074, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1055-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1055-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Space-borne lidars have been providing invaluable information of atmospheric optical properties since 2006, and new lidar missions are on the way to ensure continuous observations. In this work, we compare the clouds estimated from space-borne ALADIN and CALIOP lidar observations. The analysis of collocated data shows that the agreement between the retrieved clouds is good up to 3 km height. Above that, ALADIN detects 40 % less clouds than CALIOP, except for polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs).
Gregor Köcher, Tobias Zinner, Christoph Knote, Eleni Tetoni, Florian Ewald, and Martin Hagen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1033–1054, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1033-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1033-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a setup for systematic characterization of differences between numerical weather models and radar observations for convective weather situations. Radar observations providing dual-wavelength and polarimetric variables to infer information about hydrometeor shapes and sizes are compared against simulations using microphysics schemes of varying complexity. Differences are found in ice and liquid phase, pointing towards issues of some schemes in reproducing particle size distributions.
Simon Pfreundschuh, Stuart Fox, Patrick Eriksson, David Duncan, Stefan A. Buehler, Manfred Brath, Richard Cotton, and Florian Ewald
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-677-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-677-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We test a novel method to remotely measure ice particles in clouds. This is important because such measurements are required to improve climate and weather models. The method combines a radar with newly developed sensors measuring microwave radiation at very short wavelengths. We use observations made from aircraft flying above the cloud and compare them to real measurements from inside the cloud. This works well given that one can model the ice particles in the cloud sufficiently well.
David Painemal, Douglas Spangenberg, William L. Smith Jr., Patrick Minnis, Brian Cairns, Richard H. Moore, Ewan Crosbie, Claire Robinson, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Edward L. Winstead, and Luke Ziemba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6633–6646, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6633-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6633-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud properties derived from satellite sensors are critical for the global monitoring of climate. This study evaluates satellite-based cloud properties over the North Atlantic using airborne data collected during NAAMES. Satellite observations of droplet size and cloud optical depth tend to compare well with NAAMES data. The analysis indicates that the satellite pixel resolution and the specific viewing geometry need to be taken into account in research applications.
Charles H. White, Andrew K. Heidinger, and Steven A. Ackerman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3371–3394, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3371-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3371-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Automated detection of clouds in satellite imagery is an important practice that is useful for predicting and understanding both weather and climate. Cloud detection is often difficult at night and over cold surfaces. In this paper, we discuss how a complex statistical model (a neural network) can more accurately detect clouds compared to currently used approaches. Overall, our results suggest that our approach could result in more reliable assessments of global cloud cover.
Hong Chen, Sebastian Schmidt, Michael D. King, Galina Wind, Anthony Bucholtz, Elizabeth A. Reid, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, William L. Smith, Patrick C. Taylor, Seiji Kato, and Peter Pilewskie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2673–2697, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we accessed the shortwave irradiance derived from MODIS cloud optical properties by using aircraft measurements. We developed a data aggregation technique to parameterize spectral surface albedo by snow fraction in the Arctic. We found that undetected clouds have the most significant impact on the imagery-derived irradiance. This study suggests that passive imagery cloud detection could be improved through a multi-pixel approach that would make it more dependable in the Arctic.
Steven Compernolle, Athina Argyrouli, Ronny Lutz, Maarten Sneep, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Ann Mari Fjæraa, Daan Hubert, Arno Keppens, Diego Loyola, Ewan O'Connor, Fabian Romahn, Piet Stammes, Tijl Verhoelst, and Ping Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2451–2476, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2451-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2451-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The high-resolution satellite Sentinel-5p TROPOMI observes several atmospheric gases. To account for cloud interference with the observations, S5P cloud data products (CLOUD OCRA/ROCINN_CAL, OCRA/ROCINN_CRB, and FRESCO) provide vital input: cloud fraction, cloud height, and cloud optical thickness. Here, S5P cloud parameters are validated by comparing with other satellite sensors (VIIRS, MODIS, and OMI) and with ground-based CloudNet data. The agreement depends on product type and cloud height.
Jędrzej S. Bojanowski and Jan P. Musiał
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6771–6788, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6771-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6771-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Satellites such as NOAA's Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer can uniquely observe changes in cloud cover but are affected by orbital drift that results in shifted image acquisition times, which in turn lead to spurious trends in cloud cover detected during climatological analyses. Providing a detailed quantification of these trends, we show that climate data records must be analysed with caution, as for some periods and regions they do not comply with the requirements for climate data.
Andrzej Z. Kotarba
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4995–5012, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4995-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4995-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates the operational approach for producing global (Level 3) cloud amount based on MODIS cloud masks (Level 2). Using CALIPSO we calculate the actual cloud fractions for each cloud mask category, which are 21.5 %, 27.7 %, 66.6 %, and 94.7 % instead of assumed 0 %, 0 %, 100 %, and 100 %. Consequently we find the operational procedure unreliable, especially on a regional/local scale. A method of how to correct and calibrate MODIS global data using CALIPSO detections is suggested.
Benjamin Marchant, Steven Platnick, Kerry Meyer, and Galina Wind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3263–3275, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3263-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Multilayer cloud scenes (such as an ice cloud overlapping a liquid cloud) are common in the Earth's atmosphere and are quite difficult to detect from space. The detection of multilayer clouds is important to better understand how they interact with the light and their impact on the climate. So, for the instrument MODIS an algorithm has been developed to detect those clouds, and this paper presents an evaluation of this algorithm by comparing it with
other instruments.
Alexis Hunzinger, Joseph C. Hardin, Nitin Bharadwaj, Adam Varble, and Alyssa Matthews
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3147–3166, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3147-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3147-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The calibration of weather radars is one of the most dominant sources of errors hindering their use. This work takes a technique for tracking the changes in radar calibration using the radar clutter from the ground and extends it to higher-frequency research radars. It demonstrates that after modifications the technique is successful but that special care needs to be taken in its application at high frequencies. The technique is verified using data from multiple DOE ARM field campaigns.
Dieter R. Poelman and Wolfgang Schulz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2965–2977, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2965-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2965-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The objective of this work is to quantify the similarities and contrasts between the lightning observations from the Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) on the International Space Station (ISS) and the ground-based European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID) network. This work is timely, given that the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG), which has a lightning imager (LI) on board, is going to be launched in 2 years.
Manfred Brath, Robin Ekelund, Patrick Eriksson, Oliver Lemke, and Stefan A. Buehler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2309–2333, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2309-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2309-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Microwave dual-polarization observations consistently show that larger atmospheric ice particles tend to have a preferred orientation. We provide a publicly available database of microwave and submillimeter wave scattering properties of oriented ice particles based on discrete dipole approximation scattering calculations. Detailed radiative transfer simulations, recreating observed polarization patterns, are additionally presented in this study.
Erin A. Riley, Jessica M. Kleiss, Laura D. Riihimaki, Charles N. Long, Larry K. Berg, and Evgueni Kassianov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2099–2117, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Discrepancies in hourly shallow cumuli cover estimates can be substantial. Instrument detection differences contribute to long-term bias in shallow cumuli cover estimates, whereas narrow field-of-view configurations impact measurement uncertainty as averaging time decreases. A new tool is introduced to visually assess both impacts on sub-hourly cloud cover estimates. Accurate shallow cumuli cover estimation is needed for model–observation comparisons and studying cloud-surface interactions.
Robin Ekelund, Patrick Eriksson, and Simon Pfreundschuh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 501–520, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-501-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-501-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric ice particles (e.g. snow and ice crystals) are an important part of weather, climate, and the hydrological cycle. This study investigates whether combined satellite measurements by radar and radiometers at microwave wavelengths can be used to find the most likely shape of such ice particles. The method was limited when using only currently operating sensors (CloudSat radar and the GPM Microwave Imager) but shows promise if the upcoming Ice Cloud Imager is also considered.
Juan Huo, Daren Lu, Shu Duan, Yongheng Bi, and Bo Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud top height (CTH) is one of the important cloud parameters providing information about the vertical structure of cloud water content. To better understand the accuracy of CTH derived from passive satellite data, 2 years of ground-based Ka-band radar measurements are compared with CTH inferred from Terra/Aqua MODIS and Himawari AHI. It is found that MODIS and AHI underestimate CTH relative to radar by −1.10 km. Both MODIS and AHI CTH retrieval accuracy depend strongly on cloud depth.
Vladimir S. Kostsov, Anke Kniffka, Martin Stengel, and Dmitry V. Ionov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5927–5946, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5927-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5927-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud liquid water path (LWP) is one of the target atmospheric parameters retrieved remotely from ground-based and space-borne platforms. The LWP data delivered by the satellite instruments SEVIRI and AVHRR together with the data provided by the ground-based radiometer RPG-HATPRO near St. Petersburg, Russia, have been compared. Our study revealed considerable differences between LWP data from SEVIRI and AVHRR in winter over ice-covered relatively small water bodies in this region.
Jonathan K. P. Shonk, Jui-Yuan Christine Chiu, Alexander Marshak, David M. Giles, Chiung-Huei Huang, Gerald G. Mace, Sally Benson, Ilya Slutsker, and Brent N. Holben
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5087–5099, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5087-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5087-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Retrievals of cloud optical depth made using AERONET radiometers in “cloud mode” rely on the assumption that all cloud is liquid. The presence of ice cloud therefore introduces errors in the retrieved optical depth, which can be over 25 in optically thick ice clouds. However, such clouds are not frequent and the long-term mean optical depth error is about 3 for a sample of real clouds. A correction equation could improve the retrieval further, although this would require extra instrumentation.
Chaojun Shi, Yatong Zhou, Bo Qiu, Jingfei He, Mu Ding, and Shiya Wei
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4713–4724, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4713-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4713-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud segmentation plays a very important role in astronomical observatory site selection. At present, few researchers segment cloud in nocturnal all-sky imager (ASI) images. We propose a new automatic cloud segmentation algorithm to segment cloud pixels from diurnal and nocturnal ASI images called an enhancement fully convolutional network (EFCN). Experiments showed that the proposed EFCN was much more accurate in cloud segmentation for diurnal and nocturnal ASI images.
Maximilian Maahn, Fabian Hoffmann, Matthew D. Shupe, Gijs de Boer, Sergey Y. Matrosov, and Edward P. Luke
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3151–3171, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3151-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3151-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud radars are unique instruments for observing cloud processes, but uncertainties in radar calibration have frequently limited data quality. Here, we present three novel methods for calibrating vertically pointing cloud radars. These calibration methods are based on microphysical processes of liquid clouds, such as the transition of cloud droplets to drizzle drops. We successfully apply the methods to cloud radar data from the North Slope of Alaska (NSA) and Oliktok Point (OLI) ARM sites.
Florian Ewald, Silke Groß, Martin Hagen, Lutz Hirsch, Julien Delanoë, and Matthias Bauer-Pfundstein
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1815–1839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1815-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1815-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study gives a summary of lessons learned during the absolute calibration of the airborne, high-power Ka-band cloud radar HAMP MIRA on board the German research aircraft HALO. The first part covers the internal calibration of the instrument where individual instrument components are characterized in the laboratory. In the second part, the internal calibration is validated with external reference sources like the ocean surface backscatter and different air- and spaceborne cloud radars.
Stuart Fox, Jana Mendrok, Patrick Eriksson, Robin Ekelund, Sebastian J. O'Shea, Keith N. Bower, Anthony J. Baran, R. Chawn Harlow, and Juliet C. Pickering
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1599–1617, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1599-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1599-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Airborne observations of ice clouds are used to validate radiative transfer simulations using a state-of-the-art database of cloud ice optical properties. Simulations at these wavelengths are required to make use of future satellite instruments such as the Ice Cloud Imager. We show that they can generally reproduce observed cloud signals, but for a given total ice mass there is considerable sensitivity to the cloud microphysics, including the particle shape and distribution of ice mass.
Katrin Lonitz and Alan J. Geer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 405–429, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-405-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-405-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Permittivity models for microwave frequencies of liquid water below 0°C are poorly constrained due to limited laboratory experiments and observations, especially for high microwave frequencies. This uncertainty translates directly into errors in retrieved liquid water paths of up to 80 %. This study investigates the effect of different liquid water permittivity models including models based on the most recent observations.
Vladimir S. Kostsov, Anke Kniffka, and Dmitry V. Ionov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5439–5460, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5439-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5439-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds are a very important component of the climate system and of the hydrological cycle in the Arctic and sub-Arctic. A joint analysis of the cloud parameters obtained remotely from satellite and ground-based observations near St Petersburg, Russia, has been made. Our study has revealed considerable differences between the cloud properties over land and over water areas in the region under investigation.
Fanny Jeanneret, Giovanni Martucci, Simon Pinnock, and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4153–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4153-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4153-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Above mountainous regions, satellites may have difficulty in discriminating snow from clouds: this study proposes a new method that combines different ground-based measurements to assess the sky cloudiness with high temporal resolution. The method's output is used as input to a model capable of identifying false satellite cloud detections. Results show that 62 ± 13 % of these false detections can be identified by the model when applied to the AVHRR-PM and MODIS Aqua data sets of the Cloud_cci.
Céline Cornet, Laurent C.-Labonnote, Fabien Waquet, Frédéric Szczap, Lucia Deaconu, Frédéric Parol, Claudine Vanbauce, François Thieuleux, and Jérôme Riédi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3627–3643, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3627-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3627-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of total and polarized cloud reflectance angular signatures such as the ones measured by the multi-angular and polarized radiometer POLDER3/PARASOL are used to evaluate cloud heterogeneity effects on cloud parameter retrievals. Effects on optical thickness, albedo of the cloudy scenes, effective radius and variance of the cloud droplet size distribution, cloud top pressure and aerosol above cloud are analyzed.
Rodrigo Hierro, Andrea K. Steiner, Alejandro de la Torre, Peter Alexander, Pablo Llamedo, and Pablo Cremades
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3523–3539, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3523-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3523-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper analyzed the collocated GPS radio occultation profiles near the convective systems identified from ISCCP over two orographic regions of the Alps and Andes. Gravity wave (GW) analysis over both selected regions was also carried out. The gravity wave signature from the two case studies were investigated using mesoscale WRF simulations, ERA-Interim reanalysis data, and measured RO temperature profiles. The absence of fronts or jets during both case studies reveals similar relevant GWs.
Nina Håkansson, Claudia Adok, Anke Thoss, Ronald Scheirer, and Sara Hörnquist
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3177–3196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3177-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper a new algorithm for cloud top height retrieval from imager instruments like MODIS is presented. It uses artificial neural networks and reduces the mean absolute error by 32 % compared to two other operational cloud height algorithms. This means that improved cloud height retrieval for nowcasting, as input to models and in cloud climatologies is possible.
Yu Oishi, Haruma Ishida, Takashi Y. Nakajima, Ryosuke Nakamura, and Tsuneo Matsunaga
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2863–2878, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2863-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2863-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Preparations are continuing for the launch of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite 2 (GOSAT-2) in the fiscal year 2018. To improve the accuracy of the estimates of greenhouse gases concentrations, we need to refine the existing cloud discrimination algorithm. In this paper we showed a new cloud discrimination algorithm of pre-launch version for GOSAT-2, and compared the existing algorithm with the new algorithm.
Alessandro Damiani, Hitoshi Irie, Takashi Horio, Tamio Takamura, Pradeep Khatri, Hideaki Takenaka, Takashi Nagao, Takashi Y. Nakajima, and Raul R. Cordero
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2501–2521, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2501-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2501-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Tohoku Earthquake of March 2011 stressed the need for energy source diversity, and the governmental policy in Japan has been stimulating a broader use of
renewable energy. Solar power is potentially able to mitigate climate change triggered by greenhouse gas emissions, but its instability caused by cloudiness
is a critical issue for suppliers. To develop an appropriate control system, surface solar radiation data must be made available as accurately as possible.
Karl-Göran Karlsson and Nina Håkansson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 633–649, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-633-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-633-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Data from the high-sensitivity CALIOP cloud lidar onboard the CALIPSO satellite have been used to evaluate cloud amounts estimated from satellite imagery and, specifically, from the climate data record CLARA-A2. The main purpose has been to study the limit of how thin clouds that can be detected efficiently (i.e., detected at the 50 % level) in CLARA-A2 data and how this limit varies globally. The study revealed very large geographical differences in the cloud detection efficiency.
Dieter R. Poelman, Wolfgang Schulz, Rudolf Kaltenboeck, and Laurent Delobbe
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4561–4572, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4561-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4561-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Lightning data as observed by the European Cooperation for Lightning Detection network EUCLID are used in combination with radar data to retrieve the temporal and spatial behavior of lightning outliers, i.e. discharges located in a wrong place, over a 5-year period from 2011 to 2016 in Belgium and Austria.
Johan Strandgren, Jennifer Fricker, and Luca Bugliaro
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4317–4339, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4317-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4317-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We characterise the the performance of a set of artificial neural networks used for the remote sensing of cirrus clouds from the geostationary Meteosat Second Generation satellites. The retrievals show little interference with the underlying land surface type as well as with possible liquid water clouds or aerosol layers below the cirrus cloud. We also characterise the retrievals as a funtion of optical thickness and top height and gain better understanding of the retrival uncertainties of CiPS
Victoria Sol Galligani, Die Wang, Milagros Alvarez Imaz, Paola Salio, and Catherine Prigent
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3627–3649, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3627-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3627-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Three meteorological events with deep convection and severe weather, characteristic of the SESA region, are considered. High-resolution models, a powerful tool to study convection, can be operated with different microphysics schemes (predict the development of hydrometeors, their interactions, growth, precipitation). We present a systematic evaluation of the microphysical schemes available in the WRF model by a direct comparison between satellite-based simulated and observed microwave radiances.
Kenneth Sinclair, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Brian Cairns, John Yorks, Andrzej Wasilewski, and Matthew McGill
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2361–2375, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2361-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2361-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present a multi-angular contrast approach to retrieve cloud top height (CTH) using photogrammetry. We demonstrate the method’s ability to retrieve heights of multiple cloud layers within single footprints, using the multiple views available for each footprint. This paper provides an in-depth description and performance analysis of the CTH retrieval technique and the retrieved cloud heights are evaluated using collocated data from the Cloud Physics Lidar.
John Rausch, Kerry Meyer, Ralf Bennartz, and Steven Platnick
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2105–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2105-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2105-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents the observed differences in the aggregated (Level-3) cloud droplet effective radius and droplet number concentration estimates inferred from the Aqua–MODIS cloud product collections 5.1 and 6 for warm oceanic cloud scenes over the year 2008. We note significant differences in effective radius and droplet concentration between the two products and discuss the algorithmic and calibration changes which may contribute to observed results.
Holger Sihler, Peter Lübcke, Rüdiger Lang, Steffen Beirle, Martin de Graaf, Christoph Hörmann, Johannes Lampel, Marloes Penning de Vries, Julia Remmers, Ed Trollope, Yang Wang, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 881–903, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-881-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-881-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the independent and simple IFR method to retrieve the FOV of an instrument, i.e. the two-dimensional sensitivity distribution. IFR relies on correlated measurements featuring a higher spatial resolution and was applied to two satellite instruments, GOME-2 and OMI, and a DOAS instrument integrated in an SO2 camera. Our results confirm the commonly applied FOV distributions. IFR is applicable for verification exercises as well as degradation monitoring in the field.
Frank Werner, Galina Wind, Zhibo Zhang, Steven Platnick, Larry Di Girolamo, Guangyu Zhao, Nandana Amarasinghe, and Kerry Meyer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5869–5894, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5869-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5869-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
A research–level retrieval algorithm for cloud optical and microphysical properties is developed for the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) aboard the Terra satellite. This yields reliable estimates of important cloud variables at a horizontal resolution of 30 m. Comparisons of the ASTER retrieval results with the operational cloud products from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) show a high agreement for 48 example cloud fields.
Felipe A. Mejia, Ben Kurtz, Keenan Murray, Laura M. Hinkelman, Manajit Sengupta, Yu Xie, and Jan Kleissl
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4151–4165, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4151-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4151-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
A method for retrieving cloud optical depth using a sky imager is presented. The method is applied to images taken at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site and validated against measurements from a microwave radiometer (MWR), output from the Min method for overcast skies, and τc retrieved by Beer's law from direct normal irradiance (DNI) measurements.
Cited articles
Adirosi, E., Baldini, L., and Tokay, A.: Rainfall and DSD Parameters Comparison between Micro Rain Radar, Two-Dimensional Video and Parsivel2 Disdrometers, and S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 37, 621–640, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0085.1, 2020.
Alcoba, M., Andrieu, H., and Gosset, M.: An Inverse Method for Drop Size
Distribution Retrieval from Polarimetric Radar at Attenuating Frequency,
Remote Sens., 14, 1116, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051116, 2022.
Anagnostou, M. N., Anagnostou, E. N., Vivekanandan, J., and Ogden, F. L.:
Comparison of Two Raindrop Size Distribution Retrieval Algorithms for X-Band
Dual Polarization Observations, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 589–600,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM904.1, 2008a.
Anagnostou, M. N., Anagnostou, E. N., Vulpiani, G., Montopoli, M., Marzano,
F. S., and Vivekanandan, J.: Evaluation of X-Band Polarimetric-Radar
Estimates of Drop-Size Distributions from Coincident S-Band Polarimetric
Estimates and Measured Raindrop Spectra, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
46, 3067–3075, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2000757, 2008b.
Anagnostou, M. N., Kalogiros, J., Anagnostou, E. N., and Papadopoulos, A.:
Experimental results on rainfall estimation in complex terrain with a mobile
X-band polarimetric weather radar, Atmos. Res., 94, 579–595,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.07.009, 2009.
Anagnostou, M. N., Kalogiros, J., Anagnostou, E. N., Tarolli, M.,
Papadopoulos, A., and Borga, M.: Performance evaluation of high-resolution
rainfall estimation by X-band dual-polarization radar for flash flood
applications in mountainous basins, J. Hydrol., 394, 4–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.026, 2010.
Anagnostou, M. N., Kalogiros, J., Marzano, F. S., Anagnostou, E. N.,
Montopoli, M., and Piccioti, E.: Performance Evaluation of a New
Dual-Polarization Microphysical Algorithm Based on Long-Term X-Band Radar
and Disdrometer Observations, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 560–576,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-057.1, 2013.
Andsager, K., Beard, K. V., and Laird, N. F.: Laboratory Measurements of
Axis Ratios for Large Raindrops, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2673–2683,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2673:LMOARF>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Bao, X., Wu, L., Zhang, S., Li, Q., Lin, L., Zhao, B., Wu, D., Xia, W., and
Xu, B.: Distinct Raindrop Size Distributions of Convective Inner- and
Outer-Rainband Rain in Typhoon Maria (2018), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
125, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032482, 2020.
Beard, K. V. and Chuang, C.: A New Model for the Equilibrium Shape of
Raindrops, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1509–1524, 1987.
Brandes, E. A., Zhang, G., and Vivekanandan, J.: Experiments in Rainfall
Estimation with a Polarimetric Radar in a Subtropical Environment, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 41, 674–685, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0674:EIREWA>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Brandes, E. A., Zhang, G., and Vivekanandan, J.: An Evaluation of a Drop
Distribution–Based Polarimetric Radar Rainfall Estimator, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 42, 652–660, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0652:AEOADD>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Brandes, E. A., Zhang, G., and Vivekanandan, J.: Comparison of Polarimetric
Radar Drop Size Distribution Retrieval Algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 21, 584–598, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0584:COPRDS>2.0.CO;2, 2004a.
Brandes, E. A., Zhang, G., and Vivekanandan, J.: Drop Size Distribution
Retrieval with Polarimetric Radar: Model and Application, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 43, 461–475, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0461:DSDRWP>2.0.CO;2, 2004b.
Brandes, E. A., Zhang, G., and Sun, J.: On the Influence of Assumed Drop
Size Distribution Form on Radar-Retrieved Thunderstorm Microphysics, J.
Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 45, 259–268, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2335.1, 2006.
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar:
Principles and applications, Cambridge University Press, 636 pp., ISBN: 9780511541094, 2001.
Bringi, V. N., Huang, G.-J., Chandrasekar, V., and Gorgucci, E.: A Methodology for Estimating the Parameters of a Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Model from Polarimetric Radar Data: Application to a Squall-Line Event from the TRMM/Brazil Campaign, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 633–645, 2002.
Cao, Q. and Zhang, G.: Errors in Estimating Raindrop Size Distribution
Parameters Employing Disdrometer and Simulated Raindrop Spectra, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 48, 406–425, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC2026.1, 2009.
Cao, Q., Zhang, G., Brandes, E., Schuur, T., Ryzhkov, A., and Ikeda, K.:
Analysis of Video Disdrometer and Polarimetric Radar Data to Characterize
Rain Microphysics in Oklahoma, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47, 2238–2255,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1732.1, 2008.
Cao, Q., Zhang, G., Brandes, E. A., and Schuur, T. J.: Polarimetric Radar
Rain Estimation through Retrieval of Drop Size Distribution Using a Bayesian
Approach, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 49, 973–990,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2227.1, 2010.
Cao, Q., Zhang, G., and Xue, M.: A Variational Approach for Retrieving
Raindrop Size Distribution from Polarimetric Radar Measurements in the
Presence of Attenuation, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 52, 169–185,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0101.1, 2013.
Chandrasekar, V. and Bringi, V. N.: Simulation of Radar Reflectivity and
Surface Measurements of rainfall, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 4, 464–478, 1987.
Chen, G., Zhao, K., Zhang, G., Huang, H., Liu, S., Wen, L., Yang, Z., Yang,
Z., Xu, L., and Zhu, W.: Improving Polarimetric C-Band Radar Rainfall
Estimation with Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer Observations in Eastern
China, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 1375–1391, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0215.1, 2017.
Chu, Y.-H. and Su, C.-L.: An Investigation of the Slope–Shape Relation for
Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47,
2531–2544, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1755.1, 2008.
Doviak, R. J. and Zrnić, D. S.: Doppler radar and weather observations,
2nd edn., Academic Press, San Diego, 562 pp., ISBN: 9780122214226, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-22358-0, 1993.
Gao, W., Sui, C.-H., Chen Wang, T.-C., and Chang, W.-Y.: An evaluation and
improvement of microphysical parameterization from a two-moment cloud
microphysics scheme and the Southwest Monsoon Experiment
(SoWMEX)/Terrain-influenced Monsoon Rainfall Experiment (TiMREX)
observations, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D19101,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015718, 2011.
Gorgucci, E., Scarchilli, G., Chandrasekar, V., and Bringi, V. N.:
Measurement of Mean Raindrop Shape from Polarimetric Radar Observations, J.
Atmos. Sci., 57, 3406–3413,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<3406:MOMRSF>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Gorgucci, E., Scarchilli, G., Chandrasekar, V., and Bringi, V. N.: Rainfall
Estimation from Polarimetric Radar Measurements: Composite Algorithms Immune
to Variability in Raindrop Shape–Size Relation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 18, 1773–1786, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1773:REFPRM>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Gorgucci, E., Chandrasekar, V., Bringi, V. N., and Scarchilli, G.:
Estimation of Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters from Polarimetric Radar
Measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2373–2384,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2373:EORSDP>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Gosset, M., Zahiri, E.-P., and Moumouni, S.: Rain drop size distribution
variability and impact on X-band polarimetric radar retrieval: Results from
the AMMA campaign in Benin, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 243–256,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.556, 2010.
Haddad, Z. S., Short, D. A., Durden, S. L., Im, E., Hensley, S., Grable, M.
B., and Black, R. A.: A new parametrization of the rain dropsize
distribution, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 35, 532–539,
https://doi.org/10.1109/36.581961, 1997.
Illingworth, A. J. and Blackman, T. M.: The Need to Represent Raindrop Size
Spectra as Normalized Gamma Distributions for the Interpretation of
Polarization Radar Observations, J. Appl. Meteorol., 41, 286–297,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0286:TNTRRS>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Kim, H.-L., Jung, S.-H., and Jang, K.-I.: Estimating Rain Microphysical
Characteristics Using S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar in South Korea, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 37, 1067–1084, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0068.1, 2020.
Koffi, A. K., Gosset, M., Zahiri, E.-P., Ochou, A. D., Kacou, M., Cazenave,
F., and Assamoi, P.: Evaluation of X-band polarimetric radar estimation of
rainfall and rain drop size distribution parameters in West Africa,
Atmos. Res., 143, 438–461, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.03.009, 2014.
Kozu, T. and Nakamura, K.: Rainfall Parameter Estimation from Dual-Radar
Measurement Combining Reflectivity Profile and Path-integrated Attenuation,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 8, 259–270, 1991.
Kozu, T., Reddy, K. K., Mori, S., Thurai, M., Ong, J. T., Rao, D. N., and
Shimomai, T.: Seasonal and Diurnal Variations of Raindrop Size Distribution
in Asian Monsoon Region, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser II, 84A, 195–209,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.84A.195, 2006.
Kumar, L. S., Lee, Y. H., and Ong, J. T.: Two-Parameter Gamma Drop Size
Distribution Models for Singapore, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 49,
3371–3380, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2124464, 2011.
Lavanya, S., Kirankumar, N. V. P., Aneesh, S., Subrahmanyam, K. V., and
Sijikumar, S.: Seasonal variation of raindrop size distribution over a
coastal station Thumba: A quantitative analysis, Atmos. Res., 229, 86–99,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.06.004, 2019.
Lee, G. W. and Zawadzki, I.: Variability of Drop Size Distributions:
Time-Scale Dependence of the Variability and Its Effects on Rain Estimation,
J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 44, 241–255, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2183.1, 2005.
Liu, H. and Chandrasekar, V.: Classification of Hydrometeors Based on
Polarimetric Radar Measurements: Development of Fuzzy Logic and Neuro-Fuzzy
Systems, and In-Situ Verification, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 17,
140–164, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0140:COHBOP>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Maki, M., Park, S.-G., and Bringi, V. N.: Effect of Natural Variations in
Rain Drop Size Distributions on Rain Rate Estimators of 3 cm Wavelength
Polarimetric Radar, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 83, 871–893,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.83.871, 2005.
Marzano, F. S., Scaranari, D., and Vulpiani, G.: Supervised Fuzzy-Logic
Classification of Hydrometeors Using C-Band Weather Radars, IEEE Trans.
Geosci. Remote Sens., 45, 3784–3799, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.903399, 2007.
Matrosov, S. Y., Clark, K. A., Martner, B. E., and Tokay, A.: X-Band
Polarimetric Radar Measurements of Rainfall, J. Appl. Meteorol., 41,
941–952, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0941:XBPRMO>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Matrosov, S. Y., Kingsmill, D. E., Martner, B. E., and Ralph, F. M.: The
Utility of X-Band Polarimetric Radar for Quantitative Estimates of Rainfall
Parameters, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 248–262, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM424.1, 2005.
Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., and Macke, A.: Scattering of light by
polydisperse, randomly oriented, finite circular cylinders, Appl. Optics, 35,
4927, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.004927, 1996.
Moisseev, D. and Chandrasekar, V.: Examination of the mu – lambda Relation
Suggested for Drop Size Distribution Parameters, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Technol., 24, 847–855, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2010.1, 2007.
Penide, G., Protat, A., Kumar, V. V., and May, P. T.: Comparison of Two
Convective/Stratiform Precipitation Classification Techniques: Radar
Reflectivity Texture versus Drop Size Distribution–Based Approach, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 30, 2788–2797, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00019.1, 2013.
Pruppacher, H. R. and Beard, K. V.: A wind tunnel investigation of the
internal circulation and shape of water drops falling at terminal velocity
in air, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 247–256,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640807, 1970.
Pruppacher, H. R. and Pitter, R. L.: A Semi-Emprical Determination of the
Shape of Cloud and Rain Drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 86–94, 1971.
Radhakrishna, B. and Rao, T. N.: Statistical Characteristics of Multipeak
Raindrop Size Distributions at the Surface and Aloft in Different Rain
Regimes, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 3501–3518, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2967.1, 2009.
Radhakrishna, B. and Rao, T. N.: Diurnal Variation of Rainfall in the
Presence of Large- and Small-Scale Precipitating Systems during Different
Monsoon Seasons over a Complex Terrain (Gadanki) Region, J. Appl. Meteorol.
Climatol., 60, 857–872, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0269.1, 2021.
Radhakrishna, B., Rao, T. N., Rao, D. N., Rao, N. P., Nakamura, K., and
Sharma, A. K.: Spatial and seasonal variability of raindrop size
distributions in southeast India, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04203,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011226, 2009.
Rao, T. N., Rao, D. N., Mohan, K., and Raghavan, S.: Classification of
tropical precipitating systems and associated Z–R relationships, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 17699–17711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900836, 2001.
Rao, T. N., Kirankumar, N. V. P., Radhakrishna, B., and Narayana Rao, D.: On
the variability of the shape-slope parameter relations of the gamma raindrop
size distribution model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L22809,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028440, 2006.
Rao, T. N., Kirankumar, N. V. P., Radhakrishna, B., Rao, D. N., and
Nakamura, K.: Classification of Tropical Precipitating Systems Using Wind
Profiler Spectral Moments. Part II: Statistical Characteristics of Rainfall
Systems and Sensitivity Analysis, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 25,
898–908, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA1032.1, 2008.
Rao, T. N., Radhakrishna, B., Nakamura, K., and Prabhakara Rao, N.:
Differences in raindrop size distribution from southwest monsoon to
northeast monsoon at Gadanki, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1630–1637,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.432, 2009.
Rao, T. N., Amarjyothi, K., and Rao, S. V. B.: Attenuation relations for
monsoonal rain at the X band from disdrometric measurements: Dependency on
temperature, raindrop size distribution and drop shape models, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 144, 64–76, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3291, 2018.
Rao, T. N., Anandan, V. K., Abhijeet, K., Pradeep Kumar, C., and Radhakrishna, B.: Dual-polarization Radar for Observing Precipitation at X band (DROP-X) – System description and validation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., in preparation, 2023.
Rauber, R. M. and Nesbitt, S. W.: Radar Meteorology – A First Course, John
Wiley & Sons Ltd, 443 pp., ISBN: 978-1-118-43262-4, 2018.
Raupach, T. H. and Berne, A.: Retrieval of the raindrop size distribution from polarimetric radar data using double-moment normalisation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2573–2594, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2573-2017, 2017.
Rosenfeld, D. and Ulbrich, C. W.: Cloud Microphysical Properties, Processes,
and Rainfall Estimation Opportunities, Meteorol. Monogr., 30, 237–237,
https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401(2003)030<0237:CMPPAR>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Ryzhkov, A., Zhang, P., Bukovčić, P., Zhang, J., and Cocks, S.:
Polarimetric Radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation, Remote Sens., 14,
1695, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071695, 2022.
Ryzhkov, A. V. and Zrnic, D. S.: Radar Polarimetry for Weather Observations,
Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05093-1, 2019.
Saikranthi, K., Narayana Rao, T., Radhakrishna, B., and Rao, S. V. B.:
Morphology of the vertical structure of precipitation over India and
adjoining oceans based on long-term measurements of TRMM PR, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 8433–8449, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021774, 2014.
Seela, B. K., Janapati, J., Lin, P.-L., Wang, P. K., and Lee, M.-T.:
Raindrop Size Distribution Characteristics of Summer and Winter Season
Rainfall Over North Taiwan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 11602–11624, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028307, 2018.
Seliga, T. A. and Bringi, V. N.: Potential Use of Radar Differential
Reflectivity Measurement at Orthogonal Polarization for Measuring
precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 15, 69–76, 1976.
Serio, M. A., Carollo, F. G., and Ferro, V.: Raindrop size distribution and
terminal velocity for rainfall erosivity studies. A review, J. Hydrol., 576,
210–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.040, 2019.
Sheppard, B. E. and Joe, P. I.: Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution
Measurements by a Joss-Waldvogel Disdrometer, a PMS 2DG Spectrometer, and a
POSS Doppler Radar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 11, 874–887, 1994.
Smith, P. L.: Raindrop Size Distributions: Exponential or Gamma-Does the
Difference Matter?, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 1031–1034,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1031:RSDEOG>2.0.CO;2, 2003.
Sulochana, Y., Rao, T. N., Sunilkumar, K., Chandrika, P., Raman, M. R., and
Rao, S. V. B.: On the seasonal variability of raindrop size distribution and
associated variations in reflectivity – Rainrate relations at Tirupati, a
tropical station, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 147, 98–105,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.07.011, 2016.
Tang, Q., Xiao, H., Guo, C., and Feng, L.: Characteristics of the raindrop
size distributions and their retrieved polarimetric radar parameters in
northern and southern China, Atmos. Res., 135–136, 59–75,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.003, 2014.
Testud, J., Oury, S., Black, R. A., Amayenc, P., and Dou, X.: The Concept of
“Normalized” Distribution to Describe Raindrop Spectra: A Tool for Cloud
Physics and Cloud Remote Sensing, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1118–1140,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1118:TCONDT>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Thurai, M. and Bringi, V. N.: Application of the generalized gamma model to
represent the full rain drop size distribution spectra, J. Appl. Meteorol.
Climatol., 57, 1197–1210, https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-17-0235.1, 2018.
Tokay, A., Kruger, A., Krajewski, W. F., Kucera, P. A., and Filho, A. J. P.:
Measurements of drop size distribution in the southwestern Amazon basin, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, 8052, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000355, 2002.
Tokay, A., D'Adderio, L. P., Marks, D. A., Pippitt, J. L., Wolff, D. B., and
Petersen, W. A.: Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA's
S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometers, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 59, 517–533, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0339.1, 2020a.
Tokay, A., D'Adderio, L. P., Wolff, D. B., and Petersen, W. A.: Development
and Evaluation of the Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters for the NASA
Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Ground Validation Program, J.
Atmos, Ocean. Technol., 37, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0071.1, 2020b.
Trömel, S., Kumjian, M. R., Ryzhkov, A. V., Simmer, C., and Diederich,
M.: Backscatter Differential Phase – Estimation and Variability, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 52, 2529–2548, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0124.1, 2013.
Uijlenhoet, R.: Raindrop size distributions and radar reflectivity–rain rate relationships for radar hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 615–628, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-615-2001, 2001.
Ulbrich, C. W.: Natural Variation in the Analytical form of Raindrop Size
distribution, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1764–1775, 1983.
Vivekanandan, J., Zrnic, D. S., Ellis, S. M., Oye, R., Ryzhkov, A. V., and
Straka, J.: Cloud Microphysics Retrieval Using S-Band Dual-Polarization
Radar Measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 381–388, 1999.
Vivekanandan, J., Zhang, G., Ellis, S. M., Rajopadhyaya, D., and Avery, S.
K.: Radar reflectivity calibration using differential propagation phase
measurement, Radio Sci., 38, 8049, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RS002676, 2003.
Vulpiani, G., Marzano, F. S., Chandrasekar, V., Berne, A., and Uijlenhoet,
R.: Polarimetric Weather Radar Retrieval of Raindrop Size Distribution by
Means of a Regularized Artificial Neural Network, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote
Sens., 44, 3262–3275, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.878438, 2006.
Wen, G., Xiao, H., Yang, H., Bi, Y., and Xu, W.: Characteristics of summer and winter precipitation over northern China, Atmos. Res., 197, 390–406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.07.023, 2017.
Wen, L., Zhao, K., Chen, G., Wang, M., Zhou, B., Huang, H., Hu, D., Lee,
W.-C., and Hu, H.: Drop Size Distribution Characteristics of Seven Typhoons
in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6529–6548, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027950, 2018.
Willis, P. T.: Functional Fits to Some Observed Drop Size Distributions and
Parameterization of Rain, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1648–1661, 1984.
Yoshikawa, E., Chandrasekar, V., Ushio, T., and Matsuda, T.: A Bayesian
Approach for Integrated Raindrop Size Distribution (DSD) Retrieval on an
X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Network, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 33,
377–389, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0060.1, 2016.
Zhang, G.: Weather radar polarimetry, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group,
Boca Raton London New York, 304 pp., ISBN: 978-1-4398-6958-1, 2017.
Zhang, G., Vivekanandan, J., and Brandes, E.: A Method for Estimating Rain
Rate and Drop Size Distribution from Polarimetric Radar Measurements, IEEE
Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 39, 830–841, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.917906, 2001.
Zhang, G., Sun, J., and Brandes, E. A.: Improving Parameterization of Rain
Microphysics with Disdrometer and Radar Observations, J. Atmos. Sci.,
63, 1273–1290, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3680.1, 2006.
Zheng, H., Wu, Z., Zhang, L., Xie, Y., and Lei, H.: Improving Radar Rainfall
Estimations with Scaled Raindrop Size Spectra in Mei-Yu Frontal Rainstorms,
Sensors, 20, 5257, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185257, 2020.
Zrnic, D. S., Ryzhkov, A., Straka, J., Liu, Y., and Vivekanandan, J.:
Testing a Procedure for Automatic Classification of Hydrometeor Types, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 18, 892–913,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0892:TAPFAC>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Short summary
The present study focuses on retrieving and validating raindrop size distribution (DSD) relations for monsoonal rainfall, which are required for retrieving DSDs with polarimetric radar measurements. The seasonal variation in DSD is quite large and significant, and as a result the coefficients also vary considerably between the seasons and from those existing elsewhere. Among the existing DSD methods, the N-gamma method performs better than the other methods.
The present study focuses on retrieving and validating raindrop size distribution (DSD)...
